<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hot Air &#187; State Department</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/tags/state-department/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oversight looking to interview thirteen more State Dept officials plus ARB report authors on Benghazi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=262170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, it's still on.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Screen-shot-2013-05-01-at-12.17.24-PM-e1367425126599.png" /></a></p><p>Oh, it's still on.</p>
<hr /><p>There&#8217;s been some concern[-trolling] that Republicans might be pushing their luck with the extent to which they are focusing on Scandalmania and especially the ongoing Benghazi debacle, but a CNN poll earlier this week confirmed that a healthy majority of 59 percent of Americans approve of the way Republicans have been handling the investigation, with [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Department employee: The administration has made me the scapegoat for Benghazi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maxwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scapegoat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The overall goal is to restore my honor.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/hc.jpg" /></a></p><p>“The overall goal is to restore my honor.”</p>
<hr /><p>For the second time today (or third?), the word &#8220;Kafkaesque&#8221; seems appropriate. Subpoena this man. “I had no involvement to any degree with decisions on security and the funding of security at our diplomatic mission in Benghazi,” [Raymond Maxwell] said&#8230; The State Department declined to comment on the reasons that Maxwell and the other officials [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration sources explain Benghazi: &#8220;It&#8217;s actually closer to us being idiots&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharyl Attkisson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fallback defense.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/o-h.jpg" /></a></p><p>The fallback defense.</p>
<hr /><p>Sharyl Attkisson hinted last night on Twitter that she would have something &#8220;interesting&#8221; on Benghazi today.  The CBS reporter didn&#8217;t disappoint.  Although it&#8217;s not exactly a blockbuster revelation, the change in tone in White House trial balloons in its defense of the Benghazi debacle is stunning: Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>144</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woodward: Don&#8217;t dismiss Benghazi as a scandal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I have to go back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts to the conversations, and he personally went through them and said, 'Oh, let's not tell this, let's not show this.'"]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/woodward-benghazi.jpg" /></a></p><p>"I have to go back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts to the conversations, and he personally went through them and said, 'Oh, let's not tell this, let's not show this.'"</p>
<hr /><p>We heard from one half of the Watergate-exposing journalistic duo this week on the AP scandal, and now the other half weighs in on the supposedly waning Benghazi debate.  The White House released 100 pages of e-mails that went around the administration on 9/14 &#8212; but oddly not on 9/12 or 9/13 &#8212; less than [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The amazing, shrinking Benghazi talking points</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 12:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["FBI says AQ (not AQIM) was involved and they are pursuing that theory.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Jay-Carney-e1368560404291.png" /></a></p><p>"FBI says AQ (not AQIM) was involved and they are pursuing that theory.”</p>
<hr /><p>The White House finally released the e-mail string that led to the creation of the talking points for the Benghazi terrorist attack that somehow completely missed the fact that it was a terrorist attack.  Did that succeed in having the Obama administration&#8217;s argument that it reflected the best intelligence at the time?  Not if you read [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>162</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Document dump: White House releases 100 pages of Benghazi e-mails</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discovery.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/o-grim.jpg" /></a></p><p>Discovery.</p>
<hr /><p>Jake Tapper has all of them in PDF form. Click the link and let&#8217;s start crowdsourcing. This one&#8217;s the standout so far: &#8220;FBI says AQ (not AQIM) was involved and they are pursuing that theory.&#8221; AQIM is &#8220;Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb,&#8221; a.k.a. the group&#8217;s north African offshoot. The FBI evidently had reason to [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>197</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of course: Keystone pipeline decision probably won&#8217;t be ready until early 2014 or so</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/of-course-keystone-pipeline-decision-probably-wont-be-ready-until-early-2014-or-so/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/of-course-keystone-pipeline-decision-probably-wont-be-ready-until-early-2014-or-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How convenient.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/of-course-keystone-pipeline-decision-probably-wont-be-ready-until-early-2014-or-so/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/ObamaSad2.jpg" /></a></p><p>How convenient.</p>
<hr /><p>The Obama administration has repeatedly assured the public that they were just a hop, skip, and a jump away from making a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline, seeing as how its gone through years of environmental impact reviews from various sources and gotten a green light every time (which should hardly come as a [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/of-course-keystone-pipeline-decision-probably-wont-be-ready-until-early-2014-or-so/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/of-course-keystone-pipeline-decision-probably-wont-be-ready-until-early-2014-or-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the White House selectively leak e-mail to distort Benghazi timeline story? Update: Axelrod: Release all the Libya e-mails</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Axelrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Tapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Karl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How ... meta.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Jay-Carney-e1368560404291.png" /></a></p><p>How ... meta.</p>
<hr /><p>In order to understand just how badly the White House may have fumbled this ball, let&#8217;s go back to last week.  Stephen Hayes at the Weekly Standard reported from Congressional sources on a White House-State Department e-mail string that made clear that the administration wanted the talking points on Benghazi massaged to protect sources and [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pickering: Why would we interview the person in charge when we could blame the flunkies, or something</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/pickering-why-would-we-interview-the-person-in-charge-when-we-could-blame-the-flunkies-or-something/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/pickering-why-would-we-interview-the-person-in-charge-when-we-could-blame-the-flunkies-or-something/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountability Review Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Pickering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patterns.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/pickering-why-would-we-interview-the-person-in-charge-when-we-could-blame-the-flunkies-or-something/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/pickering.jpg" /></a></p><p>Patterns.</p>
<hr /><p>Want to know why State Department whistleblower Eric Nordstrom called the Accountability Review Board a whitewash designed to protect the highest ranks at Foggy Bottom?  Take a listen to the man who ran the ARB.  CBS News&#8217; Bob Schieffer asked Thomas Pickering why the supposedly independent panel didn&#8217;t bother to depose the Secretary of State [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/pickering-why-would-we-interview-the-person-in-charge-when-we-could-blame-the-flunkies-or-something/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/13/pickering-why-would-we-interview-the-person-in-charge-when-we-could-blame-the-flunkies-or-something/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC: Petraeus called final Benghazi talking points &#8220;useless&#8221; the day before Rice&#8217;s full Ginsburg; Update: Transcript added</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/12/abc-petraeus-called-final-benghazi-talking-points-useless-the-day-before-rices-full-ginsburg/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/12/abc-petraeus-called-final-benghazi-talking-points-useless-the-day-before-rices-full-ginsburg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Morell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Rogers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I would just as soon not use them, but it's their call."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/12/abc-petraeus-called-final-benghazi-talking-points-useless-the-day-before-rices-full-ginsburg/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/abc-benghazi.jpg" /></a></p><p>"I would just as soon not use them, but it's their call."</p>
<hr /><p>One of the mysteries in the Benghazi scandal has been the role of David Petraeus, who was then the Director of the CIA but was forced to resign in a personal scandal shortly thereafter.  While the White House and State Department tried to cobble together talking points to explain away the terrorist attack that took [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/12/abc-petraeus-called-final-benghazi-talking-points-useless-the-day-before-rices-full-ginsburg/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/12/abc-petraeus-called-final-benghazi-talking-points-useless-the-day-before-rices-full-ginsburg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>356</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carney on Benghazi edits: Need I remind you that a certain Mr. Mitt Romney tried to make political hay of the attack?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/carney-responds-to-benghazi-criticism-need-i-remind-you-that-a-certain-mr-mitt-romney-tried-to-make-political-hay-of-the-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/carney-responds-to-benghazi-criticism-need-i-remind-you-that-a-certain-mr-mitt-romney-tried-to-make-political-hay-of-the-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 22:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stylistic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Distractions.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/carney-responds-to-benghazi-criticism-need-i-remind-you-that-a-certain-mr-mitt-romney-tried-to-make-political-hay-of-the-attack/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/jc2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Distractions.</p>
<hr /><p>Via NRO, here&#8217;s what the White House has been reduced to in order to downplay a scoop that even some liberal mags are now grudgingly admitting isn&#8217;t nothing. This wasn&#8217;t the lowlight of the briefing either. The lowlight was Carney mumbling about the White House having made &#8220;stylistic&#8221; changes to the CIA&#8217;s talking points when [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/carney-responds-to-benghazi-criticism-need-i-remind-you-that-a-certain-mr-mitt-romney-tried-to-make-political-hay-of-the-attack/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/carney-responds-to-benghazi-criticism-need-i-remind-you-that-a-certain-mr-mitt-romney-tried-to-make-political-hay-of-the-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>155</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reason: Three reasons Benghazi matters</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/reason-three-reasons-benghazi-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/reason-three-reasons-benghazi-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 20:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retreat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tripoli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US intervention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ramirez: Who moved my cheese?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/reason-three-reasons-benghazi-matters/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ramirez-benghazi-trap-tn2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Ramirez: Who moved my cheese?</p>
<hr /><p>With the lid coming off of what very clearly looks like an attempt to cover up the nature of the attack on our consulate in Benghazi, Obama administration apologists have stepped up their efforts to flood the debate with paraphrases of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton&#8217;s attempt to shut down discussion of the White [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/reason-three-reasons-benghazi-matters/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/reason-three-reasons-benghazi-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK &#8212; and US &#8212; pulling some staff from Tripoli as security deteriorates</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/uk-and-us-pulling-staff-from-tripoli/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/uk-and-us-pulling-staff-from-tripoli/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retreat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tripoli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US intervention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US issues a curious warning on Libya travel.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/uk-and-us-pulling-staff-from-tripoli/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/libya-militias.jpg" /></a></p><p>US issues a curious warning on Libya travel.</p>
<hr /><p>How well has that Western intervention worked out in Libya? Starting well over a year ago, Western nations all pulled out of Benghazi &#8212; the city the intervention was supposed to protect &#8212; after it became clear to all but the US that radical Islamist &#8220;militias&#8221; had seized control of the city and region.  The [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/uk-and-us-pulling-staff-from-tripoli/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/uk-and-us-pulling-staff-from-tripoli/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC: Benghazi talking points went through 12 revisions, scrubbed of terror reference; Update: Video added</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/abc-benghazi-talking-points-went-through-12-revisions-scrubbed-of-terror-reference/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/abc-benghazi-talking-points-went-through-12-revisions-scrubbed-of-terror-reference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 12:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Karl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did Jay Carney lie, or was he deceived?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/abc-benghazi-talking-points-went-through-12-revisions-scrubbed-of-terror-reference/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/klavan-crowder.jpg" /></a></p><p>Did Jay Carney lie, or was he deceived?</p>
<hr /><p>Following on the heels of blockbuster testimony from three whistleblowers regarding the Benghazi terrorist attack, ABC&#8217;s Jonathan Karl did some digging into the evolution of the talking points used afterward to paint the attack as a spontaneous demonstration gone wild.  The White House claims that the talking points reflected the CIA&#8217;s assessment of the situation, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/abc-benghazi-talking-points-went-through-12-revisions-scrubbed-of-terror-reference/">View the video &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/10/abc-benghazi-talking-points-went-through-12-revisions-scrubbed-of-terror-reference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>303</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/quotes-of-the-day-1370/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/quotes-of-the-day-1370/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 02:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consulate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fallout.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/quotes-of-the-day-1370/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/hc.jpg" /></a></p><p>Fallout.</p>
<hr /><p>On the heels of a dramatic hearing where three whistle-blowers testified, Fox News has learned that former Vice President Dick Cheney on Thursday, on the Hill for a meeting with House Republicans, also told lawmakers: &#8220;I think Hillary (Clinton) should be subpoenaed if necessary.&#8221; The comments and developments signal that Republicans will continue to press [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/quotes-of-the-day-1370/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/quotes-of-the-day-1370/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>427</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coburn: State omitted something very significant to Senate Intel Committee</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/coburn-state-omitted-something-very-significant-to-senate-intel-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/coburn-state-omitted-something-very-significant-to-senate-intel-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 15:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beth jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitewash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Glaring."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/coburn-state-omitted-something-very-significant-to-senate-intel-committee/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Tom-Coburn.jpg" /></a></p><p>"Glaring."</p>
<hr /><p>How significant? Well, we don&#8217;t know that precisely, because Sen. Tom Coburn can&#8217;t tell the Morning Joe crew what got omitted.  Suffice it to say, Coburn explains, that the omission from State on what happened in Benghazi was significant and will cause big problems for the Obama administration &#8230; if it ever gets declassified: Sen. Tom [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/coburn-state-omitted-something-very-significant-to-senate-intel-committee/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/coburn-state-omitted-something-very-significant-to-senate-intel-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Armed Service chair denied access to Benghazi files</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/house-armed-service-chair-denied-access-to-benghazi-files/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/house-armed-service-chair-denied-access-to-benghazi-files/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard McKeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitewash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oversight.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/house-armed-service-chair-denied-access-to-benghazi-files/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/mckeon.jpg" /></a></p><p>Oversight.</p>
<hr /><p>One question left mainly unaddressed by yesterday&#8217;s hearing on Benghazi &#8212; and by others, as well &#8212; is the lack of preparation by the Obama administration and the US military for the potential for attack in Benghazi.  After all, terrorist attacks had been increasing steadily since the fall of the Qaddafi regime in 2011.  Other [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/house-armed-service-chair-denied-access-to-benghazi-files/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/house-armed-service-chair-denied-access-to-benghazi-files/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benghazi &#8211; what&#8217;s new?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/benghazi-whats-new/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/benghazi-whats-new/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitewash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just about everything.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/benghazi-whats-new/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/hicks2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Just about everything.</p>
<hr /><p>Not much, if you listen to apologists for the White House and State Department, even after the testimony of two previously-excluded whistleblowers yesterday at a House Oversight Committee hearing on the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans.  Glenn Kessler, the Washington Post fact-checker, says that while some of what was said has already come out [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/benghazi-whats-new/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/09/benghazi-whats-new/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>284</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/quotes-of-the-day-1369/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/quotes-of-the-day-1369/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 02:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whitewash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whitewash.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/quotes-of-the-day-1369/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/o-h1.jpg" /></a></p><p>Whitewash.</p>
<hr /><p>Partisan politics loomed over a House hearing Wednesday on the deadly September 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, as Republicans and Democrats clashed over the meaning of testimony from three witnesses who had little new to add to the story&#8230; The three State Department officials, one of whom had testified before, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/quotes-of-the-day-1369/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/quotes-of-the-day-1369/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>468</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whistleblower: Hillary cut State&#8217;s counter-terrorism bureau out of Benghazi loop</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/whistleblower-hillary-cut-states-counter-terrorism-bureau-out-of-benghazi-loop/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/whistleblower-hillary-cut-states-counter-terrorism-bureau-out-of-benghazi-loop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 12:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountability Review Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregory Hicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Oversight Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=258940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What difference at that point did it make?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/whistleblower-hillary-cut-states-counter-terrorism-bureau-out-of-benghazi-loop/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/hillary-difference.jpg" /></a></p><p>What difference at that point did it make?</p>
<hr /><p>In the previous post, I noted that Darrell Issa&#8217;s witnesses in the House Oversight hearings on Benghazi would make life difficult for both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.  Fox News reported late yesterday that one witness in particular will testify that Hillary purposefully cut out of the loop the State Department&#8217;s bureau for counter-terrorism as [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/whistleblower-hillary-cut-states-counter-terrorism-bureau-out-of-benghazi-loop/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/whistleblower-hillary-cut-states-counter-terrorism-bureau-out-of-benghazi-loop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>201</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diplomat to testify that Benghazi &#8220;was a terrorist attack from the beginning&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/diplomat-to-testify-that-benghazi-was-a-terrorist-attack-from-the-beginning/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/diplomat-to-testify-that-benghazi-was-a-terrorist-attack-from-the-beginning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 12:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountability Review Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregory Hicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Oversight Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=258937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["My jaw hit the floor as I watched this..."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/diplomat-to-testify-that-benghazi-was-a-terrorist-attack-from-the-beginning/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/hicks.jpg" /></a></p><p>"My jaw hit the floor as I watched this..."</p>
<hr /><p>&#8220;There is new information raising questions,&#8221; Bob Schieffer told a Face the Nation audience yesterdat, &#8220;of whether there was a cover-up by the State Department to deflect criticism that it had ignored requests for more security for its people in Libya.&#8221;  Schieffer and CBS should get kudos for airing the reports of this evidence, but strictly speaking, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/diplomat-to-testify-that-benghazi-was-a-terrorist-attack-from-the-beginning/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/06/diplomat-to-testify-that-benghazi-was-a-terrorist-attack-from-the-beginning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>115</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: State Department&#8217;s Benghazi review panel now under investigation; Update: 3 al Qaeda operatives took part in the attack, sources say</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/report-state-departments-benghazi-review-panel-now-under-investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/report-state-departments-benghazi-review-panel-now-under-investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 21:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=258547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...Oops?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/report-state-departments-benghazi-review-panel-now-under-investigation/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-4.33.10-PM-e1355780039595.png" /></a></p><p>...Oops?</p>
<hr /><p>Last December, the Accountability Review Board report on the happenings surrounding the terror attack in Benghazi concluded that &#8220;systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels&#8221; (but still below then-Secretary Hillary Clinton) and &#8220;inadequate&#8221; security measures were to blame for the lack of preparedness, the muddled response, and the deaths of four Americans [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/report-state-departments-benghazi-review-panel-now-under-investigation/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/report-state-departments-benghazi-review-panel-now-under-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human trafficking at Saudi diplomatic compound in Virginia?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/human-trafficking-at-saudi-diplomatic-compound-in-virginia/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/human-trafficking-at-saudi-diplomatic-compound-in-virginia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 12:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diplomat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diplomatic immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=258421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tier 3 strikes again.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/human-trafficking-at-saudi-diplomatic-compound-in-virginia/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/nbc-saudi.jpg" /></a></p><p>Tier 3 strikes again.</p>
<hr /><p>The DHS has opened an &#8220;ongoing&#8221; investigation of human trafficking at a McLean, Virginia location that has a notable owner &#8212; the King of Saudi Arabia. Police responded to a call on Tuesday to the diplomatic residence and &#8220;rescued&#8221; two women, NBC reported yesterday afternoon &#8212; and touched off a major diplomatic headache (via Katie [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/human-trafficking-at-saudi-diplomatic-compound-in-virginia/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/02/human-trafficking-at-saudi-diplomatic-compound-in-virginia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issa: The next Benghazi hearing is going to &#8220;expose new facts&#8221; the Obama admin has &#8220;tried to suppress&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/01/issa-the-next-benghazi-hearing-is-going-to-expose-new-facts-the-obama-admin-has-tried-to-suppress/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/01/issa-the-next-benghazi-hearing-is-going-to-expose-new-facts-the-obama-admin-has-tried-to-suppress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=258259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama proclaimed (or should I say, feigned?) ignorance during his presser on Tuesday when he was asked about the ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama proclaimed (or should I say, feigned?) ignorance during his presser on Tuesday when he was asked about the reported allegations against his administration for intimidating potential whistleblowers with information on the leadup to and fallout from last September&#8217;s terror attack in Benghazi, but Congressional Republicans aren&#8217;t going to allow him to get away [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/01/issa-the-next-benghazi-hearing-is-going-to-expose-new-facts-the-obama-admin-has-tried-to-suppress/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/01/issa-the-next-benghazi-hearing-is-going-to-expose-new-facts-the-obama-admin-has-tried-to-suppress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Huh, &#8220;I&#8217;m not familiar&#8221; with Benghazi whistleblowers being threatened</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/30/obama-huh-im-not-familiar-with-benghazi-whistleblowers-being-threatened/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/30/obama-huh-im-not-familiar-with-benghazi-whistleblowers-being-threatened/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=258095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm just <i>sure</i> I don't know <i>what</i> you mean...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/30/obama-huh-im-not-familiar-with-benghazi-whistleblowers-being-threatened/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Screen-shot-2013-04-30-at-2.48.10-PM-e1367347778210.png" /></a></p><p>I'm just <i>sure</i> I don't know <i>what</i> you mean...</p>
<hr /><p>President Obama really strained credulity in his presser Tuesday morning when he claimed total ignorance of the Fox News report in which former deputy assistant attorney general Victoria Toensing, representing a State Department official who wants to testify about Benghazi, alleged that the Obama administration is deliberately obfuscating the process and has even threatened the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/30/obama-huh-im-not-familiar-with-benghazi-whistleblowers-being-threatened/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/30/obama-huh-im-not-familiar-with-benghazi-whistleblowers-being-threatened/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>