<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hot Air &#187; pat toomey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/tags/pat-toomey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:21:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Manchin: We are &#8220;absolutely&#8221; going to try for another gun-control vote</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/28/manchin-we-are-absolutely-going-to-try-for-another-gun-control-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/28/manchin-we-are-absolutely-going-to-try-for-another-gun-control-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=257784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We're going to work this bill with all of our hearts."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/28/manchin-we-are-absolutely-going-to-try-for-another-gun-control-vote/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Screen-shot-2013-04-28-at-4.18.28-PM-e1367180872248.png" /></a></p><p>"We're going to work this bill with all of our hearts."</p>
<hr /><p>The Senate&#8217;s proposed gun-control bill crashed and burned earlier this month, and Majority Leader Harry Reid signaled that he was going to put the issue on the political shelf where it would presumably start to gather dust &#8212; but that might not be the case after all. Senator Manchin and Toomey revealed last week that [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/28/manchin-we-are-absolutely-going-to-try-for-another-gun-control-vote/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/28/manchin-we-are-absolutely-going-to-try-for-another-gun-control-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>174</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Manchin, Toomey close to deal on &#8220;expanded&#8221; background checks; Update: Deal reached</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/10/manchin-toomey-close-to-deal-on-expanded-background-checks/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/10/manchin-toomey-close-to-deal-on-expanded-background-checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 12:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Manchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=254109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No filibuster?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/10/manchin-toomey-close-to-deal-on-expanded-background-checks/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/cbs-manchin-toomey.jpg" /></a></p><p>No filibuster?</p>
<hr /><p>&#8220;Expanded&#8221; in this case is &#8230; a term of art, as you&#8217;ll see shortly.  As Harry Reid tries to find the votes to have a vote on his gun-control package in the Senate this week or next, two key players say they are close to an agreement on the central piece of the bill. Joe [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/10/manchin-toomey-close-to-deal-on-expanded-background-checks/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/10/manchin-toomey-close-to-deal-on-expanded-background-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>247</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inhofe, Toomey: Hey, why don&#8217;t we give Obama some flexibility on sequestration?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He'd like that, right?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-27-at-11.27.31-AM-e1361982529485.png" /></a></p><p>He'd like that, right?</p>
<hr /><p>Among the complaints about sequestration coming from the White House in recent weeks has been that the sequestration is much too indiscriminate, and that its rules pretty much legally require them to implement the cuts via budgetary hack job. Well, be careful what you ask for, Mr. President, &#8217;cause you just might get it. From [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toomey: GOP should be willing to risk shutdown to get cuts in debt ceiling deal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/03/toomey-gop-should-be-willing-to-risk-shutdown-to-get-cuts-in-debt-ceiling-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/03/toomey-gop-should-be-willing-to-risk-shutdown-to-get-cuts-in-debt-ceiling-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Katharine Ham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat toomey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Pat Toomey is one of the great accomplishments of the Tea Party Movement, and after supporting him in &#8217;04 ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Pat Toomey is one of the great accomplishments of the Tea Party Movement, and after supporting him in &#8217;04 back when Bush was backing Specter, it does my heart good to see him in our dysfunctional deliberate body. For that same reason, some are very angry at him for his vote on the fiscal [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/03/toomey-gop-should-be-willing-to-risk-shutdown-to-get-cuts-in-debt-ceiling-deal/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/03/toomey-gop-should-be-willing-to-risk-shutdown-to-get-cuts-in-debt-ceiling-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For some Super Committee members, an added incentive to avoid &#8220;doomsday&#8221; defense cuts</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/15/for-some-super-committee-members-an-added-incentive-to-avoid-doomsday-defense-cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/15/for-some-super-committee-members-an-added-incentive-to-avoid-doomsday-defense-cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tina Korbe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patty Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=153267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cuts would hit close to home.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/15/for-some-super-committee-members-an-added-incentive-to-avoid-doomsday-defense-cuts/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Patty-Murray.jpg" /></a></p><p>Cuts would hit close to home.</p>
<hr /><p>Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta has called it the &#8220;doomsday&#8221; scenario: The Super Committee deadlocks and defense funding faces substantial cuts. That&#8217;s why, the day after the president signed the debt ceiling into law, I wrote that the Super Committee would need deficit and defense hawks. A few weeks and 12 picks later, the first [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/15/for-some-super-committee-members-an-added-incentive-to-avoid-doomsday-defense-cuts/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/08/15/for-some-super-committee-members-an-added-incentive-to-avoid-doomsday-defense-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pat Toomey introduces budget that would balance the books in 10 years &#8212; but wouldn&#8217;t touch entitlements</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/10/pat-toomey-introduces-budget-that-would-balance-the-books-in-10-years-but-wouldnt-touch-entitlements/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/10/pat-toomey-introduces-budget-that-would-balance-the-books-in-10-years-but-wouldnt-touch-entitlements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 23:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat toomey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=139419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lost opportunity?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/10/pat-toomey-introduces-budget-that-would-balance-the-books-in-10-years-but-wouldnt-touch-entitlements/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/pt.jpg" /></a></p><p>Lost opportunity?</p>
<hr /><p>There&#8217;s already a nifty nine-page synopsis circulating. It looks fab on paper: No tax hikes, a modest surplus by 2021, and far less political risk for the GOP than Ryan&#8217;s budget insofar as Toomey&#8217;s plan would leave Medicare and Social Security unreformed. In fact, per page seven of the synopsis, his budget&#8217;s softer on Medicare [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/10/pat-toomey-introduces-budget-that-would-balance-the-books-in-10-years-but-wouldnt-touch-entitlements/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/10/pat-toomey-introduces-budget-that-would-balance-the-books-in-10-years-but-wouldnt-touch-entitlements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>