Hey… why not?
Why try to hide it?
Billionaires seeking protection from other billionaires
“…it is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump — helped along by Aras and Emin.”
Mistakes were made…
The merry little media war continues.
Days of future past
A terrorist by any other name…
“Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably.”
Stop asking questions
“It was about allegedly extensive electronic surveillance communications.”
“They use the rights given to them under the First Amendment to advocate…”
Best of luck. Enjoy the salmon.
Sire, the snowflakes are revolting!
“…nothing to see hear. Move along, move along.”
Oh, this should be fantastic
“This White House does not seem to respect the idea of accountability.”
“…it’s grossly overstated and it’s wrong and there’s nothing to it.”
It’s not like we’re monitoring people’s private lives
“Do you know what a scapegoat is?”
“Editors have talked to the reporter in question about the lapse.”
Respect for the Oval Office is so 2016
And we should keep it.
In two years … maybe.
“I’m looking at it very closely.”
In persona suffragium.
Mea non culpa
“This is about them.”
A nice relationship with the press can come in handy with this much on the line
“We’re doing a lot of reporting around this, so…”
The New York Times pulls the trigger early as Clinton fails to establish a clear lead
Seems to be a bit more aggressive than Redskins, but…
“We support where the legislation is now.”
‘You need to keep better records of your crappy service’