<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hot Air &#187; hagel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/tags/hagel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:01:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Heads up: Pentagon report suggests North Korea might already have nuclear missiles</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/11/heads-up-pentagon-report-suggests-north-korea-might-already-have-nuclear-missiles/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/11/heads-up-pentagon-report-suggests-north-korea-might-already-have-nuclear-missiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Dempsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lamborn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=254447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With moderate confidence.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/11/heads-up-pentagon-report-suggests-north-korea-might-already-have-nuclear-missiles/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/ch.jpg" /></a></p><p>With moderate confidence.</p>
<hr /><p>Via Eli Lake, who had a separate timely piece this morning quoting experts who think the world should be taking this latest NorK tantrum more seriously than it is. Fast-forward to this afternoon&#8217;s House Armed Services Committee hearing with Hagel and Joint Chiefs Chair Martin Dempsey. Lake: According to the [Defense Intelligence Agency] report, “DIA [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/11/heads-up-pentagon-report-suggests-north-korea-might-already-have-nuclear-missiles/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/11/heads-up-pentagon-report-suggests-north-korea-might-already-have-nuclear-missiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>147</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biden to AIPAC: No, really, Obama&#8217;s not bluffing on Iranian nukes</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/04/biden-to-aipac-no-really-obamas-not-bluffing-on-iranian-nukes/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/04/biden-to-aipac-no-really-obamas-not-bluffing-on-iranian-nukes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 23:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Israel Public Affairs Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=247671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We are not looking for war."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/04/biden-to-aipac-no-really-obamas-not-bluffing-on-iranian-nukes/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/jb1.jpg" /></a></p><p>"We are not looking for war."</p>
<hr /><p>Via CNS News, while Shotgun Joe was busy yammering here about all options still being on the table, Iran was busy announcing that they&#8217;re building 3,000 new uranium centrifuges. Uranium enrichment is, of course, the keystone of their nuclear program &#8212; but maybe not their only option. Read this interview with UN nuclear inspector Olli [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/04/biden-to-aipac-no-really-obamas-not-bluffing-on-iranian-nukes/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/04/biden-to-aipac-no-really-obamas-not-bluffing-on-iranian-nukes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Random man confirmed by Senate to lead world&#8217;s greatest military</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch5.jpg" /></a></p><p>Awesome.</p>
<hr /><p>He&#8217;s not random, though. A truly random man wouldn&#8217;t have earned the sturdy liberal support that Hagel&#8217;s Israel-focused Jew-baiting and left-of-Obama foreign policy brought him. In the end, despite weeks of dirt being dug up, not a single Democrat voted against him at any stage of the process. (That&#8217;s not including Reid&#8217;s no vote last [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>153</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No surprise: Hagel wins cloture vote easily</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confirmation next.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Confirmation next.</p>
<hr /><p>I told you the yays would be closer to 70 than to 60. Final tally: 71-27. You didn&#8217;t seriously think these losers would go to the mat to block a nominee just because he&#8217;s manifestly unqualified, did you? Eighteen Republicans voted yes, according to Fox&#8217;s Chad Pergram. The roll of glory: R&#8217;s voting to end [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louis Farrakhan: You know, when he talks about the Jewish lobby, Chuck Hagel sounds a little like me</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farrakhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Endorsements.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Endorsements.</p>
<hr /><p>The cloture vote&#8217;s tomorrow. Confirmation seems a fait accompli. Is there no man in all the land who, through his sheer odiousness, can stop this train with an anti-endorsement &#8212; a sort of demonus ex machina? Perhaps there is, my friends. Perhaps there is. “Now wait,” Farrakhan told the crowd. “He said this to Aaron [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 60th vote: Republican Richard Shelby to vote for cloture on Hagel; Update: Deb Fischer too?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shelby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“He’s probably as good as we’re going to get.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>“He’s probably as good as we’re going to get.”</p>
<hr /><p>And so, after days of accusations about what Hagel did or didn&#8217;t say at Rutgers Israeli control of the State Department, and despite the nominee&#8217;s refusal to let reporters pick through his archives, this guy&#8217;s actually gaining votes in the Senate rather than losing them. I understand the argument that the president deserves deference in [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chuck Schumer: Hagel almost had tears in his eyes when I explained that &#8220;Jewish lobby&#8221; is offensive</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jewish lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Okay.</p>
<hr /><p>How can he be sure? Hagel always looks like he&#8217;s been crying. To believe that a professional politician needed it explained to him that the term &#8220;Jewish lobby&#8221; is problematic, you&#8217;d have to believe he&#8217;s an abject imbecile. So &#8230; yeah, this is actually plausible: “He struck me as sincere, and you know, you have [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hagel&#8217;s host for 2007 Rutgers speech linked to Iranian front group</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/hagels-host-for-2007-rutgers-speech-linked-to-iranian-front-group/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/hagels-host-for-2007-rutgers-speech-linked-to-iranian-front-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amirahmadi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billy Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rutgers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friends.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/hagels-host-for-2007-rutgers-speech-linked-to-iranian-front-group/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Friends.</p>
<hr /><p>Hard for me to believe that this will pull the Senate back from the brink of confirming him if Hagel&#8217;s own mumblings about the &#8220;Jewish lobby&#8221; and prior opposition to Iran sanctions haven&#8217;t done so already. There&#8217;s no claim that he took money for his speech from the Rutgers group that sponsored him; the DC [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/hagels-host-for-2007-rutgers-speech-linked-to-iranian-front-group/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/18/hagels-host-for-2007-rutgers-speech-linked-to-iranian-front-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthews: Ted Cruz sounds a bit like Joe McCarthy, doesn&#8217;t he?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/matthews-ted-cruz-is-a-bit-like-joe-mccarthy-isnt-he/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/matthews-ted-cruz-is-a-bit-like-joe-mccarthy-isnt-he/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccaskill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Well, the jackals are in the street tonight."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/matthews-ted-cruz-is-a-bit-like-joe-mccarthy-isnt-he/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/cm1.jpg" /></a></p><p>"Well, the jackals are in the street tonight."</p>
<hr /><p>Via Newsbusters, to give you a sense of how seriously you should take this, until now his most famous accusation of McCarthyism was aimed at Rush Limbaugh for using the word &#8220;regime&#8221; to describe the Obama administration. Naturally, Matthews himself and many of his MSNBC cohorts had used the same word to describe the Bush [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/matthews-ted-cruz-is-a-bit-like-joe-mccarthy-isnt-he/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/matthews-ted-cruz-is-a-bit-like-joe-mccarthy-isnt-he/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: Hagel filibustered &#8212; barely; Update: Rand Paul getting hammered by Ron fans for voting no</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 22:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[58/40.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch4.jpg" /></a></p><p>58/40.</p>
<hr /><p>He was one vote short. Republicans Cochran, Collins, and Johanns had all already committed to voting yes so the only mystery was whether Reid could find two more GOPers to cross the aisle. He found one: As expected, Murkowski ended up erring on the side of bipartisanship. Orrin Hatch voted present, which may or may [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>233</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid: We don&#8217;t have the votes to break a GOP filibuster on Hagel; Update: Senate to vote on Hagel today</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Yet.</p>
<hr /><p>Don&#8217;t get too excited. As I&#8217;m writing this, CNN is interrupting its round-the-clock coverage of Marco Rubio drinking water to report a sellout compromise in the offing: Sources in both parties tell me compromise in the works to delay vote on Hagel, but make it a 51 vote threshold not 60. Deal not done yet [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On second thought, Susan Collins to vote no on Hagel &#8212; but yes on cloture</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 23:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Meh.</p>
<hr /><p>Remember when Major Garrett said yesterday that he had it on good authority Collins was a yes on Hagel? That would have put Democrats at 57 votes, assuming their caucus holds together, which means the chance of a filibuster was hanging by a thread. Then I saw this tweet and got excited: WASHINGTON (AP) &#8212; [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50/50 odds that Hagel withdraws?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withdraw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=243588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hope.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Hope.</p>
<hr /><p>I&#8217;m skeptical, but if a guy who&#8217;s been reporting on foreign affairs for 30 years (with a Pulitzer to his name) is willing to go out on a limb like this, he must have good reason. I don&#8217;t think that a Hagel exit would hurt President Obama much. SecDef nominees have blown up on the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Dempsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lapierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch1.jpg" /></a></p><p>Nope.</p>
<hr /><p>If you watched the Hagel hearing, you know why damage control is desperately needed this morning. You also know why Chuck Hagel&#8217;s the last guy you want doing it. Panetta and Martin Dempsey will pinch-hit instead on NBC and CNN. I&#8217;m curious to see if Dempsey sticks strictly to defense policy questions or if he [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smart power.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Smart power.</p>
<hr /><p>Hagel’s goal Thursday was to consolidate [his Democratic support] by getting at least one Republican on the committee to come out for him. Democrats hold 14 of 26 seats on Senate Armed Services, and none of them have hinted that they oppose Hagel. It made sense for Hagel to be demure—more sense than it made, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>583</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthews on McCain&#8217;s grilling of Hagel: I think he might have been having a Vietnam flashback</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/chris-matthews-on-mccains-grilling-of-hagel-i-think-he-might-have-been-having-a-vietnam-flashback/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/chris-matthews-on-mccains-grilling-of-hagel-i-think-he-might-have-been-having-a-vietnam-flashback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 01:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flashback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[questioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's come to this.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/chris-matthews-on-mccains-grilling-of-hagel-i-think-he-might-have-been-having-a-vietnam-flashback/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/cm.jpg" /></a></p><p>It's come to this.</p>
<hr /><p>You&#8217;re better off reading the transcript at Newsbusters than watching the clip, which, for some reason, excludes two of Matthews&#8217;s references to &#8220;flashbacks.&#8221; Halfway through it, I thought he was using &#8220;flashback&#8221; and &#8220;nightmare&#8221; as some sort of extremely ill-advised metaphor for what McCain was feeling yesterday while interrogating Hagel. Tasteless, yes, but just a [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/chris-matthews-on-mccains-grilling-of-hagel-i-think-he-might-have-been-having-a-vietnam-flashback/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/chris-matthews-on-mccains-grilling-of-hagel-i-think-he-might-have-been-having-a-vietnam-flashback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unspinnable: White House &#8220;disappointed&#8221; in Hagel&#8217;s performance at hearing</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/unspinnable-white-house-disappointed-in-hagels-performance-at-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/unspinnable-white-house-disappointed-in-hagels-performance-at-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disappointed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trouble?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/unspinnable-white-house-disappointed-in-hagels-performance-at-hearing/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch.jpg" /></a></p><p>Trouble?</p>
<hr /><p>There is a way to spin it, actually. You could throw a tantrum over how mean Republicans were to poor Chuck, like Chris Matthews did. But evidently, and uncharacteristically, the White House isn&#8217;t going that route. Why not? They&#8217;ll never admit that Hagel was a terrible choice by yanking the nomination; there&#8217;s also no evidence [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/unspinnable-white-house-disappointed-in-hagels-performance-at-hearing/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/unspinnable-white-house-disappointed-in-hagels-performance-at-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Lindsey Graham versus Hagel over his &#8220;Israeli lobby&#8221; comments</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/video-lindsey-graham-humiliates-chuck-hagel-over-his-israeli-lobby-comments/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/video-lindsey-graham-humiliates-chuck-hagel-over-his-israeli-lobby-comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 20:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billy Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Name one person, in your opinion, who's intimidated by the 'Israeli lobby' in the United States Senate."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/video-lindsey-graham-humiliates-chuck-hagel-over-his-israeli-lobby-comments/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gh.jpg" /></a></p><p>"Name one person, in your opinion, who's intimidated by the 'Israeli lobby' in the United States Senate."</p>
<hr /><p>You&#8217;ve already seen a bunch of video of Hagel today. Get ready to see a bunch more. As I&#8217;m writing this, I&#8217;m hearing on Twitter that Ted Cruz is destroying him over America supposedly being the &#8220;world&#8217;s bully.&#8221; This isn&#8217;t a confirmation hearing, it&#8217;s target practice. The beauty of this clip isn&#8217;t just the spectacle [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/video-lindsey-graham-humiliates-chuck-hagel-over-his-israeli-lobby-comments/">View the video &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/video-lindsey-graham-humiliates-chuck-hagel-over-his-israeli-lobby-comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/13/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-56/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/13/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-56/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colin powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=238618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/13/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-56/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/powell-endorse.jpg" /></a></p><p>Yep.</p>
<hr /><p>Smart Hagel spin from the White House this morning as the pope of &#8220;reasonableness,&#8221; a.k.a. fellow Democrat-supporting Republican Colin Powell, emerges to bless the nomination as being officially reasonable. Meanwhile, former Hagel ally turned adversary John McCain will hit &#8220;Face the Nation&#8221; to explain the end of the bromance and how it really, totally isn&#8217;t [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/13/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-56/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/13/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-56/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hagel, day two: Turns out opposing abortion in cases of rape isn&#8217;t so extreme after all</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/08/hagel-day-two-turns-out-opposing-abortion-in-cases-of-rape-isnt-so-extreme-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/08/hagel-day-two-turns-out-opposing-abortion-in-cases-of-rape-isnt-so-extreme-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military bases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Principles.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/08/hagel-day-two-turns-out-opposing-abortion-in-cases-of-rape-isnt-so-extreme-after-all/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch.jpg" /></a></p><p>Principles.</p>
<hr /><p>I knew he served with distinction in Vietnam. I&#8217;d forgotten that he also served with distinction in the war on women. When he announced his candidacy for Senate, Hagel said that he opposed abortion except to protect the life of the mother and in cases of rape and incest. Hagel decided he didn&#8217;t believe that [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/08/hagel-day-two-turns-out-opposing-abortion-in-cases-of-rape-isnt-so-extreme-after-all/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/08/hagel-day-two-turns-out-opposing-abortion-in-cases-of-rape-isnt-so-extreme-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chuck Hagel: America&#8217;s new drone czar?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/chuck-hagel-americas-new-drone-czar/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/chuck-hagel-americas-new-drone-czar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 01:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assassinations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What could go wrong?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/chuck-hagel-americas-new-drone-czar/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/hb.jpg" /></a></p><p>What could go wrong?</p>
<hr /><p>Here&#8217;s what I was getting at in the last post about O potentially using Hagel more as a fig leaf for his own hawkish policies than letting Hagel help him to unleash the dove within. To the extent the left still cares about the Bush-ier elements of Obama&#8217;s counterterror approach, their chief concern is drone [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/chuck-hagel-americas-new-drone-czar/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/chuck-hagel-americas-new-drone-czar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hagel: I&#8217;ve shown &#8220;unequivocal, total support for Israel&#8221;; Update: AIPAC standing down?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/hagel-ive-shown-unequivocal-total-support-for-israel/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/hagel-ive-shown-unequivocal-total-support-for-israel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 23:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hezbollah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nuance.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/hagel-ive-shown-unequivocal-total-support-for-israel/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch.jpg" /></a></p><p>Nuance.</p>
<hr /><p>Yeah, listen. If we&#8217;re going to confirm this guy, let&#8217;s please confirm him without sugarcoating his record. Chuck Hagel said Monday an accurate assessment of his record will demonstrate &#8220;unequivocal, total support for Israel&#8221; and endorsement of tough international economic sanctions against Iran&#8230; [T]he fact is that there is &#8220;not one shred of evidence that [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/hagel-ive-shown-unequivocal-total-support-for-israel/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/07/hagel-ive-shown-unequivocal-total-support-for-israel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple reports: Obama to nominate Hagel for defense secretary next week for some reason</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/04/multiple-reports-obama-to-nominate-hagel-for-defense-secretary-next-week-for-some-reason/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/04/multiple-reports-obama-to-nominate-hagel-for-defense-secretary-next-week-for-some-reason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=237417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pick.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/04/multiple-reports-obama-to-nominate-hagel-for-defense-secretary-next-week-for-some-reason/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/ch.jpg" /></a></p><p>The pick.</p>
<hr /><p>The White House insists no decision has been made but The Cable, NBC, Fox News, and the Daily Beast all have sources whispering that an announcement is likely to come early next week. Trial balloon to see how Senate Democrats react? For what it&#8217;s worth, the reason a lot of outside sources are being given [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/04/multiple-reports-obama-to-nominate-hagel-for-defense-secretary-next-week-for-some-reason/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/04/multiple-reports-obama-to-nominate-hagel-for-defense-secretary-next-week-for-some-reason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this Hagel nomination still happening or not?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/20/is-this-hagel-nomination-still-happening-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/20/is-this-hagel-nomination-still-happening-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trouble.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/20/is-this-hagel-nomination-still-happening-or-not/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/ch.jpg" /></a></p><p>Trouble.</p>
<hr /><p>The Free Beacon, which has been leading the charge online against his appointment, heard from a source on the Hill yesterday that Hagel might no longer be a frontrunner. Now this, from the AP: [O]pposition was growing among Senate Republicans who held their weekly, closed-door meeting on Wednesday. Lawmakers harbor real doubts about whether Hagel [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/20/is-this-hagel-nomination-still-happening-or-not/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/20/is-this-hagel-nomination-still-happening-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>