<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hot Air &#187; Democratic Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/tags/democratic-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:01:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; compromise idea: Let&#8217;s raise taxes on the rich without raising their tax rates</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/23/new-fiscal-cliff-compromise-idea-lets-raise-taxes-on-the-rich-without-raising-their-tax-rates/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/23/new-fiscal-cliff-compromise-idea-lets-raise-taxes-on-the-rich-without-raising-their-tax-rates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marginal rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=231561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nuance.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/23/new-fiscal-cliff-compromise-idea-lets-raise-taxes-on-the-rich-without-raising-their-tax-rates/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ob.jpg" /></a></p><p>Nuance.</p>
<hr /><p>I don&#8217;t understand why either side would want to do this. Actually, wait, that&#8217;s not true: I kind of understand why Democrats would want to do it. If it happens, it&#8217;ll be a heavy bludgeon to use against Republicans in the next election cycle. One possible change would tax the entire salary earned by those [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/23/new-fiscal-cliff-compromise-idea-lets-raise-taxes-on-the-rich-without-raising-their-tax-rates/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/23/new-fiscal-cliff-compromise-idea-lets-raise-taxes-on-the-rich-without-raising-their-tax-rates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What can we really learn from the 2012 polls?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/12/what-can-we-really-learn-from-the-2012-polls/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/12/what-can-we-really-learn-from-the-2012-polls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rcp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More questions than answers]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/12/what-can-we-really-learn-from-the-2012-polls/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/rcpavg12.jpg" /></a></p><p>More questions than answers</p>
<hr /><p>The main things we know about the 2012 campaign polling is that Republican (and GOP-leaning) polling generally missed, and conservative pundits generally misjudged the polls (even if some of their criticisms of specific polls were accurate). However, much of the conventional wisdom curdling around the polling and analysis thereof is not only misguided, but risks [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/12/what-can-we-really-learn-from-the-2012-polls/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/12/what-can-we-really-learn-from-the-2012-polls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First 2016 Iowa poll: Hillary 58, Biden 17, Cuomo 6</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/08/first-2016-iowa-poll-hillary-58-biden-17-cuomo-6/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/08/first-2016-iowa-poll-hillary-58-biden-17-cuomo-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 03:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=229205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we go.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/08/first-2016-iowa-poll-hillary-58-biden-17-cuomo-6/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/hc1.jpg" /></a></p><p>Here we go.</p>
<hr /><p>C&#8217;mon, I had to post it. According to Nate Silver, Hillary now has a 86.6392 percent chance at the nomination. (Kidding, kidding.) The PPP poll, which was shared exclusively with POLITICO, shows Clinton taking 58 percent of the Iowa vote in a hypothetical presidential run. Vice President Joe Biden trails far behind at 17 percent, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/08/first-2016-iowa-poll-hillary-58-biden-17-cuomo-6/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/08/first-2016-iowa-poll-hillary-58-biden-17-cuomo-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>198</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open thread: The VP debate</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/11/open-thread-the-vp-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/11/open-thread-the-vp-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raddatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=223390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Showtime.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/11/open-thread-the-vp-debate/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/pr4.jpg" /></a></p><p>Showtime.</p>
<hr /><p>9 p.m. ET across the dial. It&#8217;s true that VP debates usually don&#8217;t matter, and Gallup has the data to prove it. It&#8217;s also true that the shellacking Romney gave to the Empty Chair in Denver has created an unusual and unpredictable late swing in momentum. What we&#8217;re looking at tonight, then, isn&#8217;t so much [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/11/open-thread-the-vp-debate/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/10/11/open-thread-the-vp-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3325</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dem platform backs taxpayers subsidies for abortion through birth</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/dem-platform-backs-taxpayers-subsidies-for-abortion-through-birth/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/dem-platform-backs-taxpayers-subsidies-for-abortion-through-birth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=216321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The farce is with us.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/dem-platform-backs-taxpayers-subsidies-for-abortion-through-birth/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/cachefly/images/2009-12/unemployment-starwars.jpg" /></a></p><p>The farce is with us.</p>
<hr /><p>Democrats released their approved platform last night, a curious Labor Day exercise considering the results.  With unemployment the chief concern of voters in this election, how often does the word &#8220;unemployment&#8221; appear in the DNC document?  BuzzFeed&#8217;s Andrew Kaczynski counted, and found only three mentions;abortion got four.  What other terms outplay the biggest issue in [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/dem-platform-backs-taxpayers-subsidies-for-abortion-through-birth/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/04/dem-platform-backs-taxpayers-subsidies-for-abortion-through-birth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lieberman: This is not your father&#8217;s Democratic Party</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/18/lieberman-this-is-not-your-fathers-democratic-party/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/18/lieberman-this-is-not-your-fathers-democratic-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=207198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lost opportunities.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/18/lieberman-this-is-not-your-fathers-democratic-party/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/lieberman-secsvc-fns.jpg" /></a></p><p>Lost opportunities.</p>
<hr /><p>And hasn&#8217;t been for some time, apparently.  Senator Joe Lieberman had enough standing in his party to win the nomination for VP in 2000.  By 2006, Lieberman had to run as an independent to keep his Senate seat, and while he still caucuses with the Democrats, the independent label fits better.  Lieberman tells Howard Kurtz [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/18/lieberman-this-is-not-your-fathers-democratic-party/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/18/lieberman-this-is-not-your-fathers-democratic-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will sex-harassment scandal in NC &#8220;doom&#8221; Democrats in 2012?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/14/will-sex-harassment-scandal-in-nc-doom-democrats-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/14/will-sex-harassment-scandal-in-nc-doom-democrats-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=190316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not as much as their logo.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/14/will-sex-harassment-scandal-in-nc-doom-democrats-in-2012/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/dncc-logo.jpg" /></a></p><p>Not as much as their logo.</p>
<hr /><p>The Democratic Party chose Charlotte, North Carolina to host its convention thanks to its new status as swing state, following Barack Obama&#8217;s narrow win there in 2008.  By putting Obama on stage in Charlotte, they hope to recapture the magic in the Southern state and deny Republicans and Mitt Romney the chance to swing 15 [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/14/will-sex-harassment-scandal-in-nc-doom-democrats-in-2012/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/14/will-sex-harassment-scandal-in-nc-doom-democrats-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty tricks in Iowa involving former Obama 2008 staffer?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/21/dirty-tricks-in-iowa-involving-former-obama-2008-staffer/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/21/dirty-tricks-in-iowa-involving-former-obama-2008-staffer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Harkin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=175821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Links and strategies.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/21/dirty-tricks-in-iowa-involving-former-obama-2008-staffer/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/edwards.jpg" /></a></p><p>Links and strategies.</p>
<hr /><p>It&#8217;s difficult to know whether to tell this story in straight or reverse chronology, but either way, it raises eyebrows about the tactics that Iowa Democrats will deploy in 2012.  Let&#8217;s take this in reverse.  The story starts with an arrest yesterday in Des Moines of Zach Edwards, who works at Link Strategies as its [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/21/dirty-tricks-in-iowa-involving-former-obama-2008-staffer/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/21/dirty-tricks-in-iowa-involving-former-obama-2008-staffer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>