<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hot Air &#187; Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/tags/defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:41:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon: Let&#8217;s get real here &#8212; a lot of this cyber espionage is coming from the Chinese military</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/07/pentagon-lets-get-real-here-a-lot-of-this-cyber-espionage-is-coming-from-the-chinese-military/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/07/pentagon-lets-get-real-here-a-lot-of-this-cyber-espionage-is-coming-from-the-chinese-military/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberwar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There, we said it.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/07/pentagon-lets-get-real-here-a-lot-of-this-cyber-espionage-is-coming-from-the-chinese-military/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Screen-shot-2013-01-31-at-12.35.11-PM-e1359653767714.png" /></a></p><p>There, we said it.</p>
<hr /><p>We were all very clearly already thinking it, but the U.S. Department of Defense has taken the administration&#8217;s stance to official-status with their annual report to Congress on Chinese military developments. Real talk, via the NYT: The Obama administration on Monday explicitly accused China’s military of mounting attacks on American government computer systems and defense [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/07/pentagon-lets-get-real-here-a-lot-of-this-cyber-espionage-is-coming-from-the-chinese-military/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/07/pentagon-lets-get-real-here-a-lot-of-this-cyber-espionage-is-coming-from-the-chinese-military/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: The FBI is investigating the Boston bombing as an &#8220;act of terrorism&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/16/obama-the-fbi-is-investigating-the-boston-bombing-as-an-act-of-terrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/16/obama-the-fbi-is-investigating-the-boston-bombing-as-an-act-of-terrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=255299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heinous and cowardly.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/16/obama-the-fbi-is-investigating-the-boston-bombing-as-an-act-of-terrorism/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Screen-shot-2013-04-16-at-12.55.42-PM-e1366131425161.png" /></a></p><p>Heinous and cowardly.</p>
<hr /><p>President Obama was cautious about using the loaded word in his first address in the few hours after the bombing last night, but this morning reported that the FBI is now investigating the attack as the &#8220;act of terrorism&#8221; that it was. From the WFB: I&#8217;ve just been briefed by my national security team, including [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/16/obama-the-fbi-is-investigating-the-boston-bombing-as-an-act-of-terrorism/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/16/obama-the-fbi-is-investigating-the-boston-bombing-as-an-act-of-terrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>326</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/quotes-of-the-day-1305/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/quotes-of-the-day-1305/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequesters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=247412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pain.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/quotes-of-the-day-1305/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/o-s1.jpg" /></a></p><p>Pain.</p>
<hr /><p>The White House says its hands are tied by the $85 billion sequester, but budget experts counter that it will have some flexibility to choose what to cut and what to save. The wiggle-room is inviting accusations from Congress that President Obama is mismanaging the cuts. Critics also say the flexibility could allow the administration [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/quotes-of-the-day-1305/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/quotes-of-the-day-1305/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>547</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sequester&#8217;s in, so get ready for a &#8220;slow grind&#8221; &#8230;of campaigning</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/the-sequesters-in-so-get-ready-for-a-slow-grind-of-campaigning/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/the-sequesters-in-so-get-ready-for-a-slow-grind-of-campaigning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arne Duncan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cabinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax hikes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=247422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And so it goes.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/the-sequesters-in-so-get-ready-for-a-slow-grind-of-campaigning/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/o-point.jpg" /></a></p><p>And so it goes.</p>
<hr /><p>President Obama signed the order for sequestration to go into effect on Friday evening, after his This-Is-Happening press conference in which he chided, &#8220;We will get through this. This is not going to be an apocalypse, I think, as some people have said. It&#8217;s just dumb. And it&#8217;s going to hurt.&#8221; &#8230;Uhm, let&#8217;s holdup for [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/the-sequesters-in-so-get-ready-for-a-slow-grind-of-campaigning/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/02/the-sequesters-in-so-get-ready-for-a-slow-grind-of-campaigning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inhofe, Toomey: Hey, why don&#8217;t we give Obama some flexibility on sequestration?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He'd like that, right?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-27-at-11.27.31-AM-e1361982529485.png" /></a></p><p>He'd like that, right?</p>
<hr /><p>Among the complaints about sequestration coming from the White House in recent weeks has been that the sequestration is much too indiscriminate, and that its rules pretty much legally require them to implement the cuts via budgetary hack job. Well, be careful what you ask for, Mr. President, &#8217;cause you just might get it. From [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/27/inhofe-toomey-hey-why-dont-we-give-obama-some-flexibility-on-sequestration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Random man confirmed by Senate to lead world&#8217;s greatest military</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch5.jpg" /></a></p><p>Awesome.</p>
<hr /><p>He&#8217;s not random, though. A truly random man wouldn&#8217;t have earned the sturdy liberal support that Hagel&#8217;s Israel-focused Jew-baiting and left-of-Obama foreign policy brought him. In the end, despite weeks of dirt being dug up, not a single Democrat voted against him at any stage of the process. (That&#8217;s not including Reid&#8217;s no vote last [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/random-man-confirmed-by-senate-to-lead-worlds-greatest-military/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>153</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No surprise: Hagel wins cloture vote easily</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confirmation next.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Confirmation next.</p>
<hr /><p>I told you the yays would be closer to 70 than to 60. Final tally: 71-27. You didn&#8217;t seriously think these losers would go to the mat to block a nominee just because he&#8217;s manifestly unqualified, did you? Eighteen Republicans voted yes, according to Fox&#8217;s Chad Pergram. The roll of glory: R&#8217;s voting to end [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/26/no-surprise-hagel-wins-cloture-vote-easily/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/quotes-of-the-day-1300/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/quotes-of-the-day-1300/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crunch time.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/quotes-of-the-day-1300/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/jb3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Crunch time.</p>
<hr /><p>The White House plan so far is pretty much according to the Fireman First principle, the idea first promulgated by Washington Monthly founder Charles Peters: that a bureaucracy when faced with cuts will tout its most popular program. Hence a mayor faced with a budget shortfall says he’ll have to &#8220;cut firemen first&#8221; as opposed [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/quotes-of-the-day-1300/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/quotes-of-the-day-1300/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>394</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Louis Farrakhan: You know, when he talks about the Jewish lobby, Chuck Hagel sounds a little like me</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farrakhan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Endorsements.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Endorsements.</p>
<hr /><p>The cloture vote&#8217;s tomorrow. Confirmation seems a fait accompli. Is there no man in all the land who, through his sheer odiousness, can stop this train with an anti-endorsement &#8212; a sort of demonus ex machina? Perhaps there is, my friends. Perhaps there is. “Now wait,” Farrakhan told the crowd. “He said this to Aaron [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/25/louis-farrakhan-you-know-when-he-talks-about-the-jewish-lobby-chuck-hagel-sounds-a-little-like-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/24/quotes-of-the-day-1299/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/24/quotes-of-the-day-1299/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Panic.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/24/quotes-of-the-day-1299/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/o-grim.jpg" /></a></p><p>Panic.</p>
<hr /><p>The automatic budget cuts set to take hold this week were roundly condemned Sunday as governors, lawmakers and administration officials hoped for a deal to stave off the $85 billion reduction in government services. Suggestions intended to instill a spirit of compromise included bringing all sides to the bargaining table, where they could act like [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/24/quotes-of-the-day-1299/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/24/quotes-of-the-day-1299/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>406</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/23/quotes-of-the-day-1298/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/23/quotes-of-the-day-1298/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=246196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posturing.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/23/quotes-of-the-day-1298/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/bo.jpg" /></a></p><p>Posturing.</p>
<hr /><p>Hawaii governor Neil Abercrombie warned Congress Saturday that sequestration, the $1.2 trillion deficit reduction set to take effect March 1, would pose a threat to institutional health of Pearl Harbor, the Oahu-based headquarters of the U.S. Pacific Fleet that Abercrombie called &#8220;the most extensive on the planet in terms of its responsibilities and consequences on [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/23/quotes-of-the-day-1298/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/23/quotes-of-the-day-1298/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>392</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 60th vote: Republican Richard Shelby to vote for cloture on Hagel; Update: Deb Fischer too?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shelby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“He’s probably as good as we’re going to get.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>“He’s probably as good as we’re going to get.”</p>
<hr /><p>And so, after days of accusations about what Hagel did or didn&#8217;t say at Rutgers Israeli control of the State Department, and despite the nominee&#8217;s refusal to let reporters pick through his archives, this guy&#8217;s actually gaining votes in the Senate rather than losing them. I understand the argument that the president deserves deference in [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/21/the-60th-vote-republican-richard-shelby-to-support-hagel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chuck Schumer: Hagel almost had tears in his eyes when I explained that &#8220;Jewish lobby&#8221; is offensive</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jewish lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Okay.</p>
<hr /><p>How can he be sure? Hagel always looks like he&#8217;s been crying. To believe that a professional politician needed it explained to him that the term &#8220;Jewish lobby&#8221; is problematic, you&#8217;d have to believe he&#8217;s an abject imbecile. So &#8230; yeah, this is actually plausible: “He struck me as sincere, and you know, you have [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/20/chuck-schumer-hagel-almost-had-tears-in-his-eyes-when-i-explained-that-jewish-lobby-is-offensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: Hagel filibustered &#8212; barely; Update: Rand Paul getting hammered by Ron fans for voting no</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 22:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[58/40.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch4.jpg" /></a></p><p>58/40.</p>
<hr /><p>He was one vote short. Republicans Cochran, Collins, and Johanns had all already committed to voting yes so the only mystery was whether Reid could find two more GOPers to cross the aisle. He found one: As expected, Murkowski ended up erring on the side of bipartisanship. Orrin Hatch voted present, which may or may [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/breaking-hagel-filibustered-barely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>233</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid: We don&#8217;t have the votes to break a GOP filibuster on Hagel; Update: Senate to vote on Hagel today</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Yet.</p>
<hr /><p>Don&#8217;t get too excited. As I&#8217;m writing this, CNN is interrupting its round-the-clock coverage of Marco Rubio drinking water to report a sellout compromise in the offing: Sources in both parties tell me compromise in the works to delay vote on Hagel, but make it a 51 vote threshold not 60. Deal not done yet [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/harry-reid-we-dont-have-the-votes-to-break-a-gop-filibuster-on-hagel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>133</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Senate Dems to announce sequester-replacement plan today</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/video-senate-dems-to-announce-sequester-replacement-plan-today/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/video-senate-dems-to-announce-sequester-replacement-plan-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffett rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[normal order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patty Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tax hikes and defense, ag subsidy cuts.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/video-senate-dems-to-announce-sequester-replacement-plan-today/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/cbs-dem-sequester.jpg" /></a></p><p>Tax hikes and defense, ag subsidy cuts.</p>
<hr /><p>So what will this new plan for deficit reduction look like?  Ten years of cuts get turned into ten months of tax hikes and cuts in equal measure. The tax hikes in the plan equal that gained by Barack Obama in the January standoff for the rest of this year.  The cuts fall mainly in [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/video-senate-dems-to-announce-sequester-replacement-plan-today/">View the video &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/14/video-senate-dems-to-announce-sequester-replacement-plan-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>103</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On second thought, Susan Collins to vote no on Hagel &#8212; but yes on cloture</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 23:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meh.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Meh.</p>
<hr /><p>Remember when Major Garrett said yesterday that he had it on good authority Collins was a yes on Hagel? That would have put Democrats at 57 votes, assuming their caucus holds together, which means the chance of a filibuster was hanging by a thread. Then I saw this tweet and got excited: WASHINGTON (AP) &#8212; [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/13/on-second-thought-susan-collins-to-vote-no-on-hagel-but-yes-on-cloture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endgame: Susan Collins to vote yes on Hagel? Update: Committee approves Hagel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/12/endgame-susan-collins-to-vote-yes-on-hagel/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/12/endgame-susan-collins-to-vote-yes-on-hagel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Collins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Confirmation.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/12/endgame-susan-collins-to-vote-yes-on-hagel/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch3.jpg" /></a></p><p>Confirmation.</p>
<hr /><p>Major news from Major &#8220;Shirty Business&#8221; Garrett: I am reliably informed Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, will soon announce backing Chuck Hage. WH and Hagel backers believe they have 60 votes. &mdash; Major Garrett(@MajorCBS) February 12, 2013 Remember, to date, not a single Senate Democrat has said he/she will oppose Hagel. That&#8217;s 55 votes in the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/12/endgame-susan-collins-to-vote-yes-on-hagel/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/12/endgame-susan-collins-to-vote-yes-on-hagel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50/50 odds that Hagel withdraws?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[withdraw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=243588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hope.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Hope.</p>
<hr /><p>I&#8217;m skeptical, but if a guy who&#8217;s been reporting on foreign affairs for 30 years (with a Pulitzer to his name) is willing to go out on a limb like this, he must have good reason. I don&#8217;t think that a Hagel exit would hurt President Obama much. SecDef nominees have blown up on the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/08/5050-odds-that-hagel-withdraws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another female veteran speaks on women in combat</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/another-female-veteran-speaks-on-women-in-combat/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/another-female-veteran-speaks-on-women-in-combat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 19:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in combat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other side of the COIN]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/another-female-veteran-speaks-on-women-in-combat/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WomenInCombat.jpg" /></a></p><p>The other side of the COIN</p>
<hr /><p>Previously, I offered some of my own admittedly last century feelings about sending American women into direct, front line combat roles. That sparked a fair bit of discussion, including the submission of a letter from a woman who has seen action in the war and who was surprisingly sympathetic with at least some of my [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/another-female-veteran-speaks-on-women-in-combat/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/another-female-veteran-speaks-on-women-in-combat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>140</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Dempsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lapierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch1.jpg" /></a></p><p>Nope.</p>
<hr /><p>If you watched the Hagel hearing, you know why damage control is desperately needed this morning. You also know why Chuck Hagel&#8217;s the last guy you want doing it. Panetta and Martin Dempsey will pinch-hit instead on NBC and CNN. I&#8217;m curious to see if Dempsey sticks strictly to defense policy questions or if he [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/03/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirmation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smart power.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Smart power.</p>
<hr /><p>Hagel’s goal Thursday was to consolidate [his Democratic support] by getting at least one Republican on the committee to come out for him. Democrats hold 14 of 26 seats on Senate Armed Services, and none of them have hinted that they oppose Hagel. It made sense for Hagel to be demure—more sense than it made, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/02/quotes-of-the-day-1279/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>583</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hapless, unqualified candidate likely to receive unanimous Democratic support for key cabinet post</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/hapless-unqualified-candidate-likely-to-receive-unanimous-democratic-support-for-key-cabinet-post/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/hapless-unqualified-candidate-likely-to-receive-unanimous-democratic-support-for-key-cabinet-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 22:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carl levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/hapless-unqualified-candidate-likely-to-receive-unanimous-democratic-support-for-key-cabinet-post/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Yep.</p>
<hr /><p>Carl Levin gazes upon the future of &#8220;smart power&#8221; and sees &#8230; Chuck Hagel. &#8220;I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s going to lose any Democratic votes, that we know of,&#8221; Sen. Carl Levin told reporters after the hearing. &#8220;I think there&#8217;s at least a few Republicans who&#8217;ve already said, publicly, that they support his nomination.&#8221; When pushed, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/hapless-unqualified-candidate-likely-to-receive-unanimous-democratic-support-for-key-cabinet-post/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/hapless-unqualified-candidate-likely-to-receive-unanimous-democratic-support-for-key-cabinet-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hagel: If confirmed, I&#8217;ll be sure to learn much more about the Defense department</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/hagel-if-confirmed-ill-be-sure-to-learn-much-more-about-the-defense-department/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/hagel-if-confirmed-ill-be-sure-to-learn-much-more-about-the-defense-department/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bust?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/hagel-if-confirmed-ill-be-sure-to-learn-much-more-about-the-defense-department/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/ch2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Bust?</p>
<hr /><p>Watch the clip below. He&#8217;s also been reassuring senators that he won&#8217;t have a policymaking role as SecDef, in case they&#8217;re leery of tasking an unqualified incompetent with so much responsibility. He&#8217;s basically daring Democrats to vote no, isn&#8217;t he? Question: Are there Democratic votes in play that weren&#8217;t before? A GOP Senate aide tells [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/hagel-if-confirmed-ill-be-sure-to-learn-much-more-about-the-defense-department/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/31/hagel-if-confirmed-ill-be-sure-to-learn-much-more-about-the-defense-department/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>144</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Jay Carney blames Republicans for the terrible economic report, of course</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/30/video-jay-carney-blames-republicans-for-the-terrible-economic-report-of-course/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/30/video-jay-carney-blames-republicans-for-the-terrible-economic-report-of-course/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Our economy is facing a major headwind ... and that’s Republicans in Congress.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/30/video-jay-carney-blames-republicans-for-the-terrible-economic-report-of-course/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/jc3.jpg" /></a></p><p>“Our economy is facing a major headwind ... and that’s Republicans in Congress.”</p>
<hr /><p>One of the virtues of the &#8220;let it burn&#8221; strategy, in which the GOP stands aside and lets Democrats lead America to a new golden age by passing the unsustainable liberal agenda in toto, is that it would spare us this, at least. Aren&#8217;t single-payer and open borders a price worth paying to watch Carney [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/30/video-jay-carney-blames-republicans-for-the-terrible-economic-report-of-course/">View the video &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/30/video-jay-carney-blames-republicans-for-the-terrible-economic-report-of-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>