<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hot Air &#187; Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/tags/canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 00:31:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Al Gore: &#8220;There&#8217;s no such thing as ethical oil&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/al-gore-theres-no-such-thing-as-ethical-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/al-gore-theres-no-such-thing-as-ethical-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 22:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=259421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does he make it so <i>easy</i>?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/al-gore-theres-no-such-thing-as-ethical-oil/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Screen-shot-2013-05-08-at-1.42.21-PM-e1368035069946.png" /></a></p><p>Why does he make it so <i>easy</i>?</p>
<hr /><p>Planet earth&#8217;s noble knight never seems to tire of surpassing himself in brazen displays of sanctimoniousness, but it feels like every time he opens his mouth he&#8217;s simply offering everyone another opportunity to take him still less seriously. Via The Hill: “There’s no such thing as ethical oil. There’s only dirty oil and dirtier oil,” [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/al-gore-theres-no-such-thing-as-ethical-oil/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/08/al-gore-theres-no-such-thing-as-ethical-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House to consider (and very probably pass) pro-Keystone pipeline bill this month</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/03/house-to-consider-and-very-probably-pass-pro-keystone-pipeline-bill-this-month/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/03/house-to-consider-and-very-probably-pass-pro-keystone-pipeline-bill-this-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 23:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=258739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adding fuel to the fire.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/03/house-to-consider-and-very-probably-pass-pro-keystone-pipeline-bill-this-month/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/U.S.-Capitol.jpg" /></a></p><p>Adding fuel to the fire.</p>
<hr /><p>Presumably hoping to light a fire underneath the Obama administration&#8217;s fully political dilly-dallying on the issue, the Senate went on record in support of the Keystone XL pipeline with a (frankly symbolic) 62-37 vote on an amendment in March &#8212; and now the House is getting ready to move on the (not just symbolic) Northern [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/03/house-to-consider-and-very-probably-pass-pro-keystone-pipeline-bill-this-month/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/03/house-to-consider-and-very-probably-pass-pro-keystone-pipeline-bill-this-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian minister: Obama rejecting Keystone would be a &#8220;serious reversal in our long-standing energy relationship&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/24/canadian-minister-obama-rejecting-keystone-would-be-a-serious-reveral-in-our-long-standing-energy-relationship/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/24/canadian-minister-obama-rejecting-keystone-would-be-a-serious-reveral-in-our-long-standing-energy-relationship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=257149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irregularities.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/24/canadian-minister-obama-rejecting-keystone-would-be-a-serious-reveral-in-our-long-standing-energy-relationship/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-01-at-6.18.14-PM-e1359760754146.png" /></a></p><p>Irregularities.</p>
<hr /><p>Environmentalists went into fits of delight when the EPA left some critical comments on the State Department&#8217;s draft environmental impact review of the Keystone XL pipeline on Monday (apparently, &#8220;the State Department is incapable of doing a proper analysis of the climate, wildlife, clean water, safety and other impacts of this disastrous and unneeded project&#8221; [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/24/canadian-minister-obama-rejecting-keystone-would-be-a-serious-reveral-in-our-long-standing-energy-relationship/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/24/canadian-minister-obama-rejecting-keystone-would-be-a-serious-reveral-in-our-long-standing-energy-relationship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oops: Nixing the Keystone pipeline is probably the more environmentally costly option</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/09/oops-nixing-the-keystone-pipeline-is-probably-the-more-environmentally-option/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/09/oops-nixing-the-keystone-pipeline-is-probably-the-more-environmentally-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[train]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=254025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geniuses.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/09/oops-nixing-the-keystone-pipeline-is-probably-the-more-environmentally-option/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Screen-shot-2013-04-09-at-5.43.03-PM-e1365543892561.png" /></a></p><p>Geniuses.</p>
<hr /><p>Do you suppose the eco-trendy crowd really, carefully thought this one through before jumping on the self-righteously outraged bandwagon? I have some pretty severe doubts on the matter, but they&#8217;re in this thing, and they&#8217;re certainly not going to back down now that they&#8217;ve invested so much time, money, and media coverage to the issue [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/09/oops-nixing-the-keystone-pipeline-is-probably-the-more-environmentally-option/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/04/09/oops-nixing-the-keystone-pipeline-is-probably-the-more-environmentally-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Keystone XL pipeline gets the Senate&#8217;s endorsement</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/23/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-gets-the-senates-endorsement/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/23/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-gets-the-senates-endorsement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=251162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking their sweet time.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/23/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-gets-the-senates-endorsement/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-01-at-6.18.14-PM-e1359760754146.png" /></a></p><p>Taking their sweet time.</p>
<hr /><p>Just FYI, President Obama is officially the last man standing in the trumped-up battle over the Keystone XL pipeline&#8217;s construction; the state of Nebraska, the State Department, the House, and now even the Democrat-controlled Senate have all given the project very much on-the-record green lights. As fond as the president is of intoning on the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/23/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-gets-the-senates-endorsement/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/23/the-keystone-xl-pipeline-gets-the-senates-endorsement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Meh, the Keystone pipeline won&#8217;t really create jobs, you know</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/14/obama-meh-the-keystone-pipeline-wont-really-create-jobs-you-know/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/14/obama-meh-the-keystone-pipeline-wont-really-create-jobs-you-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=249545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walking away?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/14/obama-meh-the-keystone-pipeline-wont-really-create-jobs-you-know/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Screen-shot-2013-03-14-at-11.15.22-AM-e1363274183495.png" /></a></p><p>Walking away?</p>
<hr /><p>House Republicans&#8217; big meeting with President Obama on the Hill yesterday didn&#8217;t yield any sudden changes of heart on reaching some kind of big deficit bargain (shocking, considering how pure and straightforward I&#8217;m sure the president&#8217;s motives were, hem hem), but the president also kept his cards close to the vest on energy and how [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/14/obama-meh-the-keystone-pipeline-wont-really-create-jobs-you-know/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/14/obama-meh-the-keystone-pipeline-wont-really-create-jobs-you-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Yep, most Americans are still just fine with the Keystone pipeline</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/05/poll-yep-most-americans-are-still-just-fine-with-the-keystone-pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/05/poll-yep-most-americans-are-still-just-fine-with-the-keystone-pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=247820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike these guys.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/05/poll-yep-most-americans-are-still-just-fine-with-the-keystone-pipeline/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Screen-shot-2013-03-05-at-3.36.31-PM-e1362515913616.jpg" /></a></p><p>Unlike these guys.</p>
<hr /><p>Just in case the Obama administration had any doubt as to whether or not the general American public is supportive of the Keystone XL pipeline&#8217;s construction while they continue to bend over backwards catering to well-monied, radical environmentalist interests, a new Fox News poll confirms that, why yes &#8212; the overwhelming majority of Americans are [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/05/poll-yep-most-americans-are-still-just-fine-with-the-keystone-pipeline/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/05/poll-yep-most-americans-are-still-just-fine-with-the-keystone-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Dept report: Yeah, we can&#8217;t really think of a good reason not to build the Keystone pipeline</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/01/state-dept-report-yeah-we-cant-really-think-of-a-good-reason-not-to-build-the-keystone-pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/01/state-dept-report-yeah-we-cant-really-think-of-a-good-reason-not-to-build-the-keystone-pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 01:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=247328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friday afternoon news dump.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/01/state-dept-report-yeah-we-cant-really-think-of-a-good-reason-not-to-build-the-keystone-pipeline/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Screen-shot-2013-03-01-at-6.24.17-PM-e1362180319740.png" /></a></p><p>Friday afternoon news dump.</p>
<hr /><p>TransCanada has only been waiting for the go-ahead for the 1,700-mile Keystone XL pipeline for, oh, four or so years now, and the State Department has now several times concluded that the pipeline poses no real reason for environmental alarm &#8212; despite the vociferous protestations of its eco-critics. After having released an environmental impact review [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/01/state-dept-report-yeah-we-cant-really-think-of-a-good-reason-not-to-build-the-keystone-pipeline/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/03/01/state-dept-report-yeah-we-cant-really-think-of-a-good-reason-not-to-build-the-keystone-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Krauthammer: The Keystone pipeline is the &#8220;most open and shut case I&#8217;ve ever seen&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/19/krauthammer-the-keystone-pipeline-is-the-most-open-and-shut-case-ive-ever-seen/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/19/krauthammer-the-keystone-pipeline-is-the-most-open-and-shut-case-ive-ever-seen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Krauthammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=245345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Truth.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/19/krauthammer-the-keystone-pipeline-is-the-most-open-and-shut-case-ive-ever-seen/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-19-at-11.58.09-AM-e1361293190484.png" /></a></p><p>Truth.</p>
<hr /><p>Like Ed noted after Sunday&#8217;s rather underwhelming anti-Keystone XL pipeline protest in DC, the project really is a no-brainer across all imaginable fronts &#8212; and the Obama administration&#8217;s continue stalling is getting politically incorrigible. It&#8217;s completely understandable that the president would want to wait to make such a controversial high-profile decision until after the election, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/19/krauthammer-the-keystone-pipeline-is-the-most-open-and-shut-case-ive-ever-seen/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/19/krauthammer-the-keystone-pipeline-is-the-most-open-and-shut-case-ive-ever-seen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would the Obama administration really reject the Keystone XL pipeline?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/11/would-the-obama-administration-really-reject-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/11/would-the-obama-administration-really-reject-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=244041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mum's the word.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/11/would-the-obama-administration-really-reject-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Screen-shot-2012-12-17-at-6.26.34-PM-e1355786822451.png" /></a></p><p>Mum's the word.</p>
<hr /><p>This entire time, I thought that there was hardly a real chance that the Obama administration would ultimately reject the Keystone XL pipeline when it really came down to it. Sure, they&#8217;ve been stalling out the wazoo &#8212; presumably hoping the PR furor over the proposal would die down a bit, and/or to think up [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/11/would-the-obama-administration-really-reject-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/11/would-the-obama-administration-really-reject-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Caroline Kennedy to be next US Ambassador to Canada?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/07/report-caroline-kennedy-to-be-next-us-ambassador-to-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/07/report-caroline-kennedy-to-be-next-us-ambassador-to-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 21:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambassador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caroline Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Granholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=243291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curious.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/07/report-caroline-kennedy-to-be-next-us-ambassador-to-canada/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/cachefly/images/2008-12/ck2.jpg" /></a></p><p>Curious.</p>
<hr /><p>Ambassadorships are the fairy dust of domestic goodwill for every President, and usually go to either big donors or prominent political supporters.  While some go to professional diplomats, a significant percentage usually go to cronies for loyalty, both present and future.  With that said, the latest trial balloon from State and the White House is [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/07/report-caroline-kennedy-to-be-next-us-ambassador-to-canada/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/07/report-caroline-kennedy-to-be-next-us-ambassador-to-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Dept: Er, we&#8217;re gonna&#8217; need to delay that Keystone pipeline another few months</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/state-dept-er-were-gonna-need-to-delay-that-keystone-pipeline-another-few-months/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/state-dept-er-were-gonna-need-to-delay-that-keystone-pipeline-another-few-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 00:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=242446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stall tactics.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/state-dept-er-were-gonna-need-to-delay-that-keystone-pipeline-another-few-months/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Screen-shot-2013-02-01-at-6.18.14-PM-e1359760754146.png" /></a></p><p>Stall tactics.</p>
<hr /><p>A couple weeks back, Nebraska Governor Heineman approved the portion of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would run through his state, obliterating the Obama administration&#8217;s last, best excuse for continuing to delay on what has become a politically explosive project. After what have already amounted to years of various reviews with positive results, the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/state-dept-er-were-gonna-need-to-delay-that-keystone-pipeline-another-few-months/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/02/01/state-dept-er-were-gonna-need-to-delay-that-keystone-pipeline-another-few-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bipartisan senators to Obama: Come on with the Keystone pipeline already</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/24/bipartisan-senators-to-obama-come-on-with-the-keystone-pipeline-already/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/24/bipartisan-senators-to-obama-come-on-with-the-keystone-pipeline-already/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=240765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What's the holdup, people?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/24/bipartisan-senators-to-obama-come-on-with-the-keystone-pipeline-already/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/keystone-pipeline.jpg" /></a></p><p>What's the holdup, people?</p>
<hr /><p>Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman signed off on TransCanada&#8217;s revised route through his state earlier this week, effectively clearing what the Obama administration has cited as a major hurdle to green-lighting the entire Keystone XL pipeline. Having already been through years of multiple State Department reviews, and with the southern portion of the project already under [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/24/bipartisan-senators-to-obama-come-on-with-the-keystone-pipeline-already/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/24/bipartisan-senators-to-obama-come-on-with-the-keystone-pipeline-already/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could true spending cuts stimulate the economy?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/18/could-true-spending-cuts-stimulate-the-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/18/could-true-spending-cuts-stimulate-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistribution of wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax hikes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=235234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Follow the money.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/18/could-true-spending-cuts-stimulate-the-economy/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/cash-handshake.jpg" /></a></p><p>Follow the money.</p>
<hr /><p>When conservatives insist that spending cuts &#8212; actual spending cuts, and not reductions in the rate of federal expansion &#8212; the common rebuttal is that reductions in federal outlays would touch off a massive recession.  But would that actually be true?  Nick Gillespie and Veronique de Rugy look at the experience of Canada in the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/18/could-true-spending-cuts-stimulate-the-economy/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/18/could-true-spending-cuts-stimulate-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: Canada cuts ties with Iran, closing embassy in Tehran</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/08/video-canada-cuts-ties-with-iran-closing-embassy-in-tehran/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/08/video-canada-cuts-ties-with-iran-closing-embassy-in-tehran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 19:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=217298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We feel that it's no longer safe to have representatives of the government of Canada in Tehran."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/08/video-canada-cuts-ties-with-iran-closing-embassy-in-tehran/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/baird.jpg" /></a></p><p>"We feel that it's no longer safe to have representatives of the government of Canada in Tehran."</p>
<hr /><p>Does Canada know something about Iran and Israel the rest of us don&#8217;t? More than a couple of Hot Air readers posed that question after Canada announced that they would cut all diplomatic ties with the Iranians and pull their embassy out of Tehran. In fact, all of their diplomatic personnel had already left by [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/08/video-canada-cuts-ties-with-iran-closing-embassy-in-tehran/">View the video &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/09/08/video-canada-cuts-ties-with-iran-closing-embassy-in-tehran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keystone XL moving forward&#8230; maybe</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/29/keystone-xl-moving-forward-maybe/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/29/keystone-xl-moving-forward-maybe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 21:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=209170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Questions and delays]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/29/keystone-xl-moving-forward-maybe/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/OilPipeline.jpg" /></a></p><p>Questions and delays</p>
<hr /><p>In case you missed it &#8211; and judging by the content of the news cycle lately, you may well have &#8211; there has been some progress in the long delayed Keystone XL pipeline project. The progress is in the form of the last permits being approved for at least one of the three major sections [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/29/keystone-xl-moving-forward-maybe/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/07/29/keystone-xl-moving-forward-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada, France, Germany, Australia to expel Syrian diplomats over Houla slaughter</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/canada-france-germany-australia-to-expel-syrian-diplomats-over-houla-slaughter/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/canada-france-germany-australia-to-expel-syrian-diplomats-over-houla-slaughter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 14:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bashar al-Assad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houla massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kofi Annan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=197993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entire families shot in their homes by Assad's forces.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/canada-france-germany-australia-to-expel-syrian-diplomats-over-houla-slaughter/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/houla-slaughter.jpg" /></a></p><p>Entire families shot in their homes by Assad's forces.</p>
<hr /><p>Remember when the Obama administration demanded that Hosni Mubarak had to go &#8220;yesterday,&#8221; bombed Moammar Qaddafi, and then insisted that Syrian dictator Bashar Assad was a &#8220;reformer&#8221;?  The city of Houla became the latest recipient of Assad&#8217;s &#8220;reforms,&#8221; as 108 people got massacred by government forces and their allies: The U.N.&#8217;s human rights office on [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/canada-france-germany-australia-to-expel-syrian-diplomats-over-houla-slaughter/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/05/29/canada-france-germany-australia-to-expel-syrian-diplomats-over-houla-slaughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama threatens veto of highway bill over Keystone XL pipeline</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/18/obama-threatens-veto-of-highway-bill-over-keystone-xl-pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/18/obama-threatens-veto-of-highway-bill-over-keystone-xl-pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=190855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More power to the IRS?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/18/obama-threatens-veto-of-highway-bill-over-keystone-xl-pipeline/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/o-hand.jpg" /></a></p><p>More power to the IRS?</p>
<hr /><p>Time for another showdown over energy policy.  House Republicans included a provision in the new highway bill extension (five months) that would force the Obama administration to approve the complete construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.  The White House reacted about as well as one would imagine: The White House on Tuesday threatened to veto [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/18/obama-threatens-veto-of-highway-bill-over-keystone-xl-pipeline/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/18/obama-threatens-veto-of-highway-bill-over-keystone-xl-pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>305</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper: Thanks to Obama&#8217;s &#8220;no&#8221; on Keystone, the price of Canadian crude will go up for the U.S.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/03/harper-thanks-to-obamas-no-on-keystone-the-price-of-canadian-crude-will-go-up-for-the-u-s/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/03/harper-thanks-to-obamas-no-on-keystone-the-price-of-canadian-crude-will-go-up-for-the-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tina Korbe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=188347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just great.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/03/harper-thanks-to-obamas-no-on-keystone-the-price-of-canadian-crude-will-go-up-for-the-u-s/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Stephen-Harper.jpg" /></a></p><p>Just great.</p>
<hr /><p>The damage is done. Even if President Barack Obama decides to approve the Keystone XL pipeline at some point in the future, he already sent a message to Canada that our northern neighbor can&#8217;t rely on us as its only energy customer &#8212; and Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper heeded it. In an interview with [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/03/harper-thanks-to-obamas-no-on-keystone-the-price-of-canadian-crude-will-go-up-for-the-u-s/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/03/harper-thanks-to-obamas-no-on-keystone-the-price-of-canadian-crude-will-go-up-for-the-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad news, Canada. America loves you.</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/18/bad-news-canada-america-loves-you/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/18/bad-news-canada-america-loves-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 01:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=180759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We love you, eh?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/18/bad-news-canada-america-loves-you/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/CanadianMounties.jpg" /></a></p><p>We love you, eh?</p>
<hr /><p>Andrew Malcolm brings us some good news on the front of international peace and love, but some bad news for the Great White North. It turns out that of all the many nations in the world, aside from our own, Americans love Canada the best. A new Gallup Poll finds that it&#8217;s become Americans&#8217; most [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/18/bad-news-canada-america-loves-you/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/18/bad-news-canada-america-loves-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>137</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fantastic. China, Canada reach quick deals on oil, uranium</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/09/fantastic-china-canada-reach-quick-deals-on-oil-uranium/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/09/fantastic-china-canada-reach-quick-deals-on-oil-uranium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=179110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was fast]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/09/fantastic-china-canada-reach-quick-deals-on-oil-uranium/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/HarperCanadaChina.jpg" /></a></p><p>That was fast</p>
<hr /><p>Last month we discussed the rather alarming news that Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper was planning a trip to China to discuss possible natural resources deals with the economic superpower. It seemed no coincidence that the trip was announced close on the heels of Barack Obama&#8217;s decision to kick the can down the road on [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/09/fantastic-china-canada-reach-quick-deals-on-oil-uranium/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/09/fantastic-china-canada-reach-quick-deals-on-oil-uranium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>261</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: The best Super Bowl ad you&#8217;ll never see</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/03/video-the-best-super-bowl-ad-youll-never-see/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/03/video-the-best-super-bowl-ad-youll-never-see/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budweiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super Bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=178169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We have a kerfuffle."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/03/video-the-best-super-bowl-ad-youll-never-see/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/bud.jpg" /></a></p><p>"We have a kerfuffle."</p>
<hr /><p>Via Yahoo Sports, which notes that this is airing on Sunday exclusively in Canada because &#8220;Canadians are much more likely to buy beer based on something like this than a maudlin, tedious slice of Americana involving children and Clydesdales. And vice versa.&#8221; Really? The eight-millionth iteration of the Clydesdales trotting in slo-mo is more likely [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/03/video-the-best-super-bowl-ad-youll-never-see/">View the video &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/02/03/video-the-best-super-bowl-ad-youll-never-see/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super. Canadian Prime Minister meeting with China about selling their oil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/15/super-canadian-prime-minister-meeting-with-china-about-selling-their-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/15/super-canadian-prime-minister-meeting-with-china-about-selling-their-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=174851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really hate it when I'm right]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/15/super-canadian-prime-minister-meeting-with-china-about-selling-their-oil/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/OilPipeline.jpg" /></a></p><p>I really hate it when I'm right</p>
<hr /><p>I&#8217;ve lost count of how many times I&#8217;ve reported on the delicate balance between Canada and the United States when it comes to energy supplies and the politics of petroleum here at home. As recently as last month, Ed was sounding the warning bells, noting that Canada has plenty of buyers for their oil and, [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/15/super-canadian-prime-minister-meeting-with-china-about-selling-their-oil/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2012/01/15/super-canadian-prime-minister-meeting-with-china-about-selling-their-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>170</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harper to Obama: I&#8217;ve got plenty of buyers for our oil</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/21/harper-to-obama-ive-got-plenty-of-buyers-for-our-oil/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/21/harper-to-obama-ive-got-plenty-of-buyers-for-our-oil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL Pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=171039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Operators are standing by ... in Beijing.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/21/harper-to-obama-ive-got-plenty-of-buyers-for-our-oil/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/o-harper.jpg" /></a></p><p>Operators are standing by ... in Beijing.</p>
<hr /><p>Canada has patiently waited for Americans to help themselves improve our energy policy by installing a pipeline from Canada&#8217;s oil sands to our refineries in the Gulf of Mexico, but this week Prime Minister Stephen Harper signaled that their patience has limits.  Speaking to CTV, Harper reminded the US that they have a very thirsty [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/21/harper-to-obama-ive-got-plenty-of-buyers-for-our-oil/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/21/harper-to-obama-ive-got-plenty-of-buyers-for-our-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>169</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada pulls out of Kyoto treaty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/13/canada-pulls-out-of-kyoto-treaty/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/13/canada-pulls-out-of-kyoto-treaty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=169805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“It allows us to continue to create jobs and growth in Canada."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/13/canada-pulls-out-of-kyoto-treaty/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/stephen-harper.jpg" /></a></p><p>“It allows us to continue to create jobs and growth in Canada."</p>
<hr /><p>How big a deal is this, really?  Yes, Canada became the first country to formally withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol, dealing a body blow to the anthropogenic climate-change hysterics movement.  However, it&#8217;s not as if the rest of the countries that signed it have been successful in implementing it.  In fact, the US achieved a [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/13/canada-pulls-out-of-kyoto-treaty/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2011/12/13/canada-pulls-out-of-kyoto-treaty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>137</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>