<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hot Air &#187; Benghazi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/tags/benghazi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com</link>
	<description>The world’s first, full-service conservative Internet broadcast network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 21:31:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oversight looking to interview thirteen more State Dept officials plus ARB report authors on Benghazi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=262170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, it's still on.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Screen-shot-2013-05-01-at-12.17.24-PM-e1367425126599.png" /></a></p><p>Oh, it's still on.</p>
<hr /><p>There&#8217;s been some concern[-trolling] that Republicans might be pushing their luck with the extent to which they are focusing on Scandalmania and especially the ongoing Benghazi debacle, but a CNN poll earlier this week confirmed that a healthy majority of 59 percent of Americans approve of the way Republicans have been handling the investigation, with [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/oversight-looking-to-interview-thirteen-more-state-dept-officials-plus-arb-report-authors-on-benghazi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeff Flake: Yes, it&#8217;s true, these Obama scandals have made it easier to pass amnesty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/jeff-flake-yes-its-true-these-obama-scandals-have-made-it-easier-to-pass-amnesty/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/jeff-flake-yes-its-true-these-obama-scandals-have-made-it-easier-to-pass-amnesty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Flake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scsndal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=262084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I'd have to say it probably helped."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/jeff-flake-yes-its-true-these-obama-scandals-have-made-it-easier-to-pass-amnesty/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/sg.jpg" /></a></p><p>"I'd have to say it probably helped."</p>
<hr /><p>He&#8217;s not saying this critically, mind you. He&#8217;s a member of the Gang of Eight. When Chuck Schumer refers to &#8220;our Republicans,&#8221; Flake&#8217;s one of the guys he means. He wants the bill to pass. Second look at letting O off the hook for IRS-gate before these tools drop an amnesty bomb on us while [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/jeff-flake-yes-its-true-these-obama-scandals-have-made-it-easier-to-pass-amnesty/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/23/jeff-flake-yes-its-true-these-obama-scandals-have-made-it-easier-to-pass-amnesty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rothenberg: Forecast for Senate seats changing because of White House scandals</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/22/rothenberg-forecast-for-senate-seats-changing-because-of-white-house-scandals/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/22/rothenberg-forecast-for-senate-seats-changing-because-of-white-house-scandals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rothenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=262004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Change.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/22/rothenberg-forecast-for-senate-seats-changing-because-of-white-house-scandals/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/o-grim.jpg" /></a></p><p>Change.</p>
<hr /><p>Interesting, simply because it cuts against so much conventional wisdom. Many, if not quite all, recent polls suggest that O&#8217;s approval rating is hanging tough despite the scandal bombardment, probably because economic optimism is acting as anti-gravity on his numbers. Charlie Cook went so far as to publish a concern-trollish piece today nudging the GOP [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/22/rothenberg-forecast-for-senate-seats-changing-because-of-white-house-scandals/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/22/rothenberg-forecast-for-senate-seats-changing-because-of-white-house-scandals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/quotes-of-the-day-1382/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/quotes-of-the-day-1382/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trust.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/quotes-of-the-day-1382/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/o-h.jpg" /></a></p><p>Trust.</p>
<hr /><p>Monday’s revelation amounts to the fifth iteration of the Obama administration’s account of events, after initially saying that the White House had first learned of the controversy from the press&#8230; Carney pushed back at reporters frustrated with the shifting narrative. “I said that I didn’t know (these details) until Friday, but I’m getting this information [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/quotes-of-the-day-1382/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/quotes-of-the-day-1382/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>356</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP: U.S. officials have identified five Benghazi suspects &#8212; but won&#8217;t seize them because there&#8217;s not enough evidence to prosecute yet</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/ap-u-s-officials-have-identified-five-benghazi-suspects-but-wont-seize-them-because-theres-not-enough-evidence-to-prosecute-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/ap-u-s-officials-have-identified-five-benghazi-suspects-but-wont-seize-them-because-theres-not-enough-evidence-to-prosecute-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/ap-u-s-officials-have-identified-five-benghazi-suspects-but-wont-seize-them-because-theres-not-enough-evidence-to-prosecute-yet/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/o-h1.jpg" /></a></p><p>What?</p>
<hr /><p>Via the Right Sphere. Am I reading this correctly? President Dronestrike, who&#8217;s been known to liquidate people from the air in places like Pakistan with no more evidence than that their movements show the &#8220;signature&#8221; of a terrorist, now won&#8217;t go in and grab five jihadis whom the feds have reason to believe murdered a [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/ap-u-s-officials-have-identified-five-benghazi-suspects-but-wont-seize-them-because-theres-not-enough-evidence-to-prosecute-yet/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/ap-u-s-officials-have-identified-five-benghazi-suspects-but-wont-seize-them-because-theres-not-enough-evidence-to-prosecute-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast and Furious/Benghazi investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson: Something fishy&#8217;s been going on with my computers since early 2011</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/sharyl-attkisson-something-fishys-been-going-on-with-my-computers-since-early-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/sharyl-attkisson-something-fishys-been-going-on-with-my-computers-since-early-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAST AND FURIOUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharyl Attkisson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["There's definitely been an intrusion into my computer system."]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/sharyl-attkisson-something-fishys-been-going-on-with-my-computers-since-early-2011/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/sa1.jpg" /></a></p><p>"There's definitely been an intrusion into my computer system."</p>
<hr /><p>Via the Chris Stigall Show and WPHT in Philadelphia. Two weeks ago, this wouldn&#8217;t have been worth posting; Attkisson herself, I suspect, wouldn&#8217;t have mentioned it publicly. Even if she&#8217;s right about something fishy going on, there are other plausible culprits besides the U.S. government when it comes to reporters&#8217; computers being infiltrated. Two weeks [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/sharyl-attkisson-something-fishys-been-going-on-with-my-computers-since-early-2011/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/21/sharyl-attkisson-something-fishys-been-going-on-with-my-computers-since-early-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>302</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State Department employee: The administration has made me the scapegoat for Benghazi</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maxwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scapegoat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The overall goal is to restore my honor.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/hc.jpg" /></a></p><p>“The overall goal is to restore my honor.”</p>
<hr /><p>For the second time today (or third?), the word &#8220;Kafkaesque&#8221; seems appropriate. Subpoena this man. “I had no involvement to any degree with decisions on security and the funding of security at our diplomatic mission in Benghazi,” [Raymond Maxwell] said&#8230; The State Department declined to comment on the reasons that Maxwell and the other officials [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/20/state-department-employee-the-administration-has-made-me-the-scapegoat-for-benghazi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About those &#8220;doctored&#8221; Benghazi e-mails&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/about-those-doctored-benghazi-e-mails/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/about-those-doctored-benghazi-e-mails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Pfeiffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The record]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/about-those-doctored-benghazi-e-mails/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/PfeifferABC.jpg" /></a></p><p>The record</p>
<hr /><p>I understand that the posts today have focused a lot on the political talk show circuit, and some of the material being covered has some cross-over elements to it, so I apologize for that. But this one really does deserve a hearing of its own, particularly given the new &#8220;gotcha&#8221; talking points being foisted on [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/about-those-doctored-benghazi-e-mails/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/about-those-doctored-benghazi-e-mails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>270</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House word of the day &#8211; Irrelevant</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/white-house-word-of-the-day-irrelevant/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/white-house-word-of-the-day-irrelevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jazz Shaw</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Pfeiffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wheels off]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/white-house-word-of-the-day-irrelevant/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/DanPfeifferSad.jpg" /></a></p><p>Wheels off</p>
<hr /><p>One of the repeating themes I kept hearing on the news for the past few days was how the White House was going to be really glad when this week was over because things really hadn&#8217;t been going very well. I assume Sunday is still part of the same week, because not only didn&#8217;t things [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/white-house-word-of-the-day-irrelevant/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/white-house-word-of-the-day-irrelevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-74/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-74/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talk shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax exempt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scandalmania.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-74/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/o-grim.jpg" /></a></p><p>Scandalmania.</p>
<hr /><p>Any hunches as to what&#8217;ll be front and center on this morning&#8217;s shows? Top Obama crony Dan Pfeiffer will appear on NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, and probably the Food Network if they&#8217;ll have him to spin the IRS scandal, Benghazi, the DOJ&#8217;s Associated Press probe, Sebelius&#8217;s shakedown of health-industry execs, and whatever new scandal [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-74/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/19/open-thread-sunday-morning-talking-heads-74/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>251</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/quotes-of-the-day-1378/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/quotes-of-the-day-1378/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damage control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trust.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/quotes-of-the-day-1378/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/o-h.jpg" /></a></p><p>Trust.</p>
<hr /><p>We are in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate. The reputation of the Obama White House has, among conservatives, gone from sketchy to sinister, and, among liberals, from unsatisfying to dangerous. No one likes what they&#8217;re seeing. The Justice Department assault on the Associated Press and the ugly politicization of the Internal [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/quotes-of-the-day-1378/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/quotes-of-the-day-1378/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>560</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Scandalmania making amnesty more likely?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/is-scandalmania-making-amnesty-more-likely/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/is-scandalmania-making-amnesty-more-likely/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 22:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amnesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipartisan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schumer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, probably.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/is-scandalmania-making-amnesty-more-likely/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/sr1.jpg" /></a></p><p>Yep, probably.</p>
<hr /><p>This point has been made many, many, many times elsewhere this week, but let me put out a little BOLO of my own just in case attention on our side of the aisle is starting to wander too far from immigration. There are two theories on how Scandalmania might affect O&#8217;s second-term agenda. Theory one: [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/is-scandalmania-making-amnesty-more-likely/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/is-scandalmania-making-amnesty-more-likely/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration sources explain Benghazi: &#8220;It&#8217;s actually closer to us being idiots&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharyl Attkisson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fallback defense.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/o-h.jpg" /></a></p><p>The fallback defense.</p>
<hr /><p>Sharyl Attkisson hinted last night on Twitter that she would have something &#8220;interesting&#8221; on Benghazi today.  The CBS reporter didn&#8217;t disappoint.  Although it&#8217;s not exactly a blockbuster revelation, the change in tone in White House trial balloons in its defense of the Benghazi debacle is stunning: Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/obama-administration-sources-explain-benghazi-its-actually-closer-to-us-being-idiots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>144</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carney: What are these &#8216;scandals&#8217; of which you speak?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/carney-what-are-these-scandals-of-which-you-speak/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/carney-what-are-these-scandals-of-which-you-speak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piers Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Maybe it’s just me, but I’ve kind of enjoyed it.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/carney-what-are-these-scandals-of-which-you-speak/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/carney-scandal.jpg" /></a></p><p>"Maybe it’s just me, but I’ve kind of enjoyed it.”</p>
<hr /><p>No, really, Jay Carney would like to know.  Even though he only showed his face in the briefing room twice this week, and even though the White House press corps used him as a punching bag, Barack Obama&#8217;s press secretary wants you to know he&#8217;s really enjoyed having to address this avalanche of scandals.  Wait [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/carney-what-are-these-scandals-of-which-you-speak/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/carney-what-are-these-scandals-of-which-you-speak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woodward: Don&#8217;t dismiss Benghazi as a scandal</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I have to go back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts to the conversations, and he personally went through them and said, 'Oh, let's not tell this, let's not show this.'"]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/woodward-benghazi.jpg" /></a></p><p>"I have to go back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts to the conversations, and he personally went through them and said, 'Oh, let's not tell this, let's not show this.'"</p>
<hr /><p>We heard from one half of the Watergate-exposing journalistic duo this week on the AP scandal, and now the other half weighs in on the supposedly waning Benghazi debate.  The White House released 100 pages of e-mails that went around the administration on 9/14 &#8212; but oddly not on 9/12 or 9/13 &#8212; less than [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/17/woodward-dont-dismiss-benghazi-as-a-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/quotes-of-the-day-1377/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/quotes-of-the-day-1377/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 02:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politics.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/quotes-of-the-day-1377/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/i-h.jpg" /></a></p><p>Politics.</p>
<hr /><p>Republicans must guard against the temptation to count on scandal to deliver election victories in 2014 and 2016. It is a lesson they should have learned in 1998.  Republicans expected to make large gains in Congress that year but ended up losing five House seats and standing pat in the Senate. The problem was not [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/quotes-of-the-day-1377/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/quotes-of-the-day-1377/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>622</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharyl Attkisson on Benghazi: &#8220;The media’s not always consistent in the vigor that they use to pursue a given topic&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/sharyl-attkisson-on-benghazi-the-medias-not-always-consistent-in-the-vigor-that-they-use-to-pursue-a-given-topic/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/sharyl-attkisson-on-benghazi-the-medias-not-always-consistent-in-the-vigor-that-they-use-to-pursue-a-given-topic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attkisson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=261009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I think some in the media were not as curious as I think naturally journalists ought to be.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/sharyl-attkisson-on-benghazi-the-medias-not-always-consistent-in-the-vigor-that-they-use-to-pursue-a-given-topic/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/sa1.jpg" /></a></p><p>"I think some in the media were not as curious as I think naturally journalists ought to be.”</p>
<hr /><p>Via the Brody File, here&#8217;s big-media&#8217;s most dogged Benghazi reporter confirming, as tactfully as she can, that she too thinks the press is in the tank. Lest you doubt her conclusion about a certain, shall we say, curious incuriosity among her colleagues, look around at the news today and see how many reporters you find [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/sharyl-attkisson-on-benghazi-the-medias-not-always-consistent-in-the-vigor-that-they-use-to-pursue-a-given-topic/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/sharyl-attkisson-on-benghazi-the-medias-not-always-consistent-in-the-vigor-that-they-use-to-pursue-a-given-topic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The amazing, shrinking Benghazi talking points</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 12:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["FBI says AQ (not AQIM) was involved and they are pursuing that theory.”]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Jay-Carney-e1368560404291.png" /></a></p><p>"FBI says AQ (not AQIM) was involved and they are pursuing that theory.”</p>
<hr /><p>The White House finally released the e-mail string that led to the creation of the talking points for the Benghazi terrorist attack that somehow completely missed the fact that it was a terrorist attack.  Did that succeed in having the Obama administration&#8217;s argument that it reflected the best intelligence at the time?  Not if you read [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/16/the-amazing-shrinking-benghazi-talking-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>162</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/quotes-of-the-day-1376/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/quotes-of-the-day-1376/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 02:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damage control.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/quotes-of-the-day-1376/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/o-grim.jpg" /></a></p><p>Damage control.</p>
<hr /><p>More than 50 major media organizations on Tuesday sent a letter to the Department of Justice protesting the seizure of two months of The Associated Press’ phone records and calling for the department to “mitigate the damage it has caused.” In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder and Deputy Attorney James M. Cole, the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/quotes-of-the-day-1376/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/quotes-of-the-day-1376/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>493</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Document dump: White House releases 100 pages of Benghazi e-mails</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Intelligence Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discovery.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/o-grim.jpg" /></a></p><p>Discovery.</p>
<hr /><p>Jake Tapper has all of them in PDF form. Click the link and let&#8217;s start crowdsourcing. This one&#8217;s the standout so far: &#8220;FBI says AQ (not AQIM) was involved and they are pursuing that theory.&#8221; AQIM is &#8220;Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb,&#8221; a.k.a. the group&#8217;s north African offshoot. The FBI evidently had reason to [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/document-dump-white-house-releases-100-pages-of-benghazi-e-mails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>197</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio: These are the kinds of scandals you see in the third world</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/rubio-these-are-the-kinds-of-scandals-you-see-in-the-third-world/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/rubio-these-are-the-kinds-of-scandals-you-see-in-the-third-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preach.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/rubio-these-are-the-kinds-of-scandals-you-see-in-the-third-world/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Screen-shot-2013-05-15-at-11.21.56-AM-e1368631434674.png" /></a></p><p>Preach.</p>
<hr /><p>During an interview on Fox on Tuesday night, Sen. Rubio some poignant thoughts about the wildly nefarious nature of the several scandalizing stories currently bleeding out of the Obama administration: Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com I can tell you that what&#8217;s become clearly apparent is a culture throughout the federal government &#8212; not just [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/rubio-these-are-the-kinds-of-scandals-you-see-in-the-third-world/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/rubio-these-are-the-kinds-of-scandals-you-see-in-the-third-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>135</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s meme: Obama&#8217;s too passive and disinterested to have had a direct role in these scandals</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/todays-meme-obamas-too-passive-and-disinterested-to-have-had-a-direct-role-in-these-scandals/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/todays-meme-obamas-too-passive-and-disinterested-to-have-had-a-direct-role-in-these-scandals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 15:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disinterested]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Triage.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/todays-meme-obamas-too-passive-and-disinterested-to-have-had-a-direct-role-in-these-scandals/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/o-thumb.jpg" /></a></p><p>Triage.</p>
<hr /><p>I had the same thought as Matt Lewis when reading through the news this morning. There&#8217;s too much smoke now from the IRS, DOJ/AP, and Benghazi scandals to pretend there&#8217;s no fire. If you&#8217;re sympathetic to O, it&#8217;s time to shift messages from &#8220;what fire?&#8221; to &#8220;Obama should have done more to put out these [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/todays-meme-obamas-too-passive-and-disinterested-to-have-had-a-direct-role-in-these-scandals/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/todays-meme-obamas-too-passive-and-disinterested-to-have-had-a-direct-role-in-these-scandals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>226</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the White House selectively leak e-mail to distort Benghazi timeline story? Update: Axelrod: Release all the Libya e-mails</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed Morrissey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Axelrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Tapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Karl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Hayes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talking points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How ... meta.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Jay-Carney-e1368560404291.png" /></a></p><p>How ... meta.</p>
<hr /><p>In order to understand just how badly the White House may have fumbled this ball, let&#8217;s go back to last week.  Stephen Hayes at the Weekly Standard reported from Congressional sources on a White House-State Department e-mail string that made clear that the administration wanted the talking points on Benghazi massaged to protect sources and [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/15/did-the-white-house-selectively-leak-e-mail-to-distort-benghazi-timeline-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes of the day</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/quotes-of-the-day-1375/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/quotes-of-the-day-1375/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 02:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allahpundit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Triage.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/quotes-of-the-day-1375/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/wh.jpg" /></a></p><p>Triage.</p>
<hr /><p>“For fear of stating the obvious,” Kuhnhenn began, “the White House right now is confronting a confluence of issues: Benghazi talking points, IRS reviews of political groups, Justice Department’s review of journalists’ phone records, and in every instance either the president or you have placed the burden of responsibility someplace else… But it is the [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/quotes-of-the-day-1375/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/quotes-of-the-day-1375/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>317</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Boxer&#8217;s latest take on Benghazi: &#8220;Mirror, mirror, who cut the funding for diplomatic security&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/sen-boxers-latest-take-on-benghazi-mirror-mirror-who-cut-the-funding-for-diplomatic-security/</link>
		<comments>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/sen-boxers-latest-take-on-benghazi-mirror-mirror-who-cut-the-funding-for-diplomatic-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 01:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Johnsen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/?p=260587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wha...?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/sen-boxers-latest-take-on-benghazi-mirror-mirror-who-cut-the-funding-for-diplomatic-security/"><img src="http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Screen-shot-2013-05-14-at-8.43.40-PM-e1368580051241.png" /></a></p><p>Wha...?</p>
<hr /><p>On the Senate floor earlier today, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) took a moment to try her darndest to throw the still-unfolding Benghazi saga back in the oh-so-hyper-partisan Republicans&#8217; faces: Now, there&#8217;s a lot of talk going on about, &#8220;How could this happen?&#8221; and e-mails and all the rest. Let me focus on something very important: [...]</p>
<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/sen-boxers-latest-take-on-benghazi-mirror-mirror-who-cut-the-funding-for-diplomatic-security/">Read this post &raquo;</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hotair.com/archives/2013/05/14/sen-boxers-latest-take-on-benghazi-mirror-mirror-who-cut-the-funding-for-diplomatic-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>146</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>