The never-ending story
Futility, or do they have an inside track on this?
Same argument, same results
Creating entire new doctrines of law
You’re trying to break the law
“You don’t need an AK-47 or an AR-15 to hunt deer.”
Making an example.
It’s like a “bazooka” or a “cannon”
Why quibble over facts?
“evolving technology does call for evolving regulation.”
Neither locked nor loaded
Permanent minority status approaching.
“Gun control now.”
We know Kim Jong-un is a big fan!
“…we are able to move more freely and do what we need to do, whether it is illegal or not.”