Republicans should prepare for the collapse of ObamaCare
Smart conservative health policy analysts have proposed a way to cut the Gordian knot — Remove the tax deduction for health insurance purchases from employers and give it to individuals. This was actually candidate John McCain’s proposal in 2008, though, as Yuval Levin (editor of National Affairs and one of those smart analysts) noted ruefully, “Nobody told John McCain.” As Levin explains, if individuals were given a $5,000 tax credit (fully refundable for those below the poverty line) for the purchase of health insurance, insurance companies would compete to provide excellent coverage for $5,000.
If, in addition, individuals were permitted to shop across state lines for insurance, those states with fewer mandates would be able to offer cheaper plans and would accordingly get more business. Replacing traditional Medicare with premium support would encourage competition in that market, as well.
Writing in National Affairs, James Capretta and Robert Moffit summarized the ideal Republican approach this way: ” … The essential common element is a move toward consumer control. Individuals would become active, cost-conscious consumers looking for value in the health care marketplace. This shift would, in turn, create tremendous incentives for those delivering medical services to find better and less expensive ways of caring for patients and keeping them well.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
When ObamaCare collapses the GOP will try to replace it with 49 more RomneyCares.
steebo77 on March 22, 2013 at 9:08 PM
…and get ready for the push to single payer.
Mimzey on March 22, 2013 at 9:16 PM
One huge problem I have with amnesty is that I think ObamaCare will collapse… and if you pass amnesty, there’s absolutely no hope for the fix for ObamaCare to go rightward.
ObamaCare makes immigration reform more dangerous than it was even back in 2006.
ninjapirate on March 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM
McCain’s only strength was a hawkish foreign policy position. Economics? Not so much. h/c? nah.
he only had what he had been told were paths to fame…Campaign finance reform and immigration. Didn’t work out too well, for any of us
r keller on March 22, 2013 at 9:19 PM
Are you kidding? The GOP will suggest single payer, and tell us that we have to “get on board” because it’s “reality,” and more importantly to think of the votes we can win if we pre-empt the Democrats on the issue!
That’s if there’s still a GOP left by that point.
Doomberg on March 22, 2013 at 9:19 PM
right. And the left is preparing to say ‘Checkmate’, and planning their new office drapes for the next umpteen years.
r keller on March 22, 2013 at 9:23 PM
56.
davidk on March 22, 2013 at 9:28 PM
Yep, exactly. The
squishes“pragmatists” (many represent that type in the comments section here) will be saying “there’s no use fighting it. Time to join other advanced nations into the 21st century blahblahblah” just as with the social issues. It’s why there’s really no such thing as a solib/fiscon where the rubber meets the road.ddrintn on March 22, 2013 at 9:29 PM
Rational, market-based approaches to health care reform that do not provide any additional government power over people’s lives don’t serve Obama and the Democrats’ fundamental goal.
novaculus on March 22, 2013 at 9:31 PM
fixed for accuracy…
Rogue on March 22, 2013 at 9:41 PM
Yep. That’s why, since I can no longer be denied coverage for my you’re-still-alive? pre-existing conditions, I’m going to take full advantage of it by dropping coverage and stashing away what would’ve been insurance premiums in anticipation of being denied services in the future.
A large chunk of money will find those services somewhere.
rogerb on March 22, 2013 at 9:42 PM
Exactly! If they will throw out the socons at the expense of that chunk of votes then then they will have no problem ditching fiscal policies for votes either..
melle1228 on March 22, 2013 at 9:47 PM
Not for votes. For the sake of the health-care lobby, to which they are beholden, as much as Democrats.
rickv404 on March 22, 2013 at 10:13 PM
Does anyone think we will ever wake up from this long national nightmare where up is down and morons with the power to screw up our lives can’t remember from one year to the next what solutions have already been suggested?
txmomof6 on March 22, 2013 at 10:33 PM
I sure hope so…it has been a long dark period in America.
d1carter on March 22, 2013 at 11:04 PM
I like this approach, because it makes insurance portable and gives individuals more control over their own healthcare.
HOWEVER, there’s a major problem with it: 48% of Americans already pay no income tax. That means you’re taking employer-provided health care away from those who earn less and replacing it with nothing. There’s nothing to deduct from your taxes if you’re paying zero to begin with.
Unless you mean paying those people a “tax credit” for healthcare despite their not paying income taxes. At which point you’re just redistributing again, so how is it better?
Caiwyn on March 23, 2013 at 12:53 AM
Potentially after national bankruptcy, assuming we don’t get stuck with a Chavez-style dictatorship.
Doomberg on March 23, 2013 at 6:08 AM
Too late, we already got one of those.
bgibbs1000 on March 23, 2013 at 6:45 AM
It at least begins to bring proper market signals back to health care.
Odysseus on March 23, 2013 at 8:00 AM