Could Rand Paul really win?
He has a stronger organization than any other Republican
Paul starts with a built-in base of libertarians that comprises at least 10 percent of the GOP electorate, and his boosters have made tremendous inroads in state parties around the country.
They may be a minority, but they are a devoted one. Paul supporters will drive farther and work harder than any other 2016 contender’s core backers. They also tend to be younger and engaged on social media and the blogosphere in ways that people who support someone of the older generation like, say, Jeb Bush are not.
His challenge is to cultivate those loyal to his father while at the same time broadening his appeal beyond libertarians. Inside the so-called liberty movement, there’s some frustration with the younger Paul for endorsing Mitt Romney last year during the Texas Republican convention — which critics believe cost the elder Paul delegates. Some also worry about nepotism in a movement that prizes merit.
But the drone filibuster shored up most of the Paul loyalists, who had gone a bit wobbly lately.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Yes. Yes he could.
And now, the answer to your next question… 42!
JohnGalt23 on March 20, 2013 at 8:14 PM
You betcha.
petefrt on March 20, 2013 at 8:21 PM
I believe yes.
Saltysam on March 20, 2013 at 8:25 PM
Every word out of his mouth recently seems to reduce his chances.
His head filled up with helium from the positive reaction to his filibuster which accomplished nothing. Great filibuster, but it should have not ended until he had a concrete accomplishment from it.
astonerii on March 20, 2013 at 8:27 PM
Just a hunch, but I’m estimating the libertarian-conservative part of the GOP some multiple of 10%. Maybe 25-35%. Not hard core libertarians like Ron Paul, but practical libertarians like Rand Paul.
petefrt on March 20, 2013 at 8:29 PM
he basically combines Palin/Ronulan supporters, then add to that civil liberty and legalize pot types
commodore on March 20, 2013 at 8:29 PM
Yes he can win, but four years is a long time in politics.
midgeorgian on March 20, 2013 at 8:29 PM
No to amnesty-supporting Rand Paul.
I will NOT vote for illegal alien amnesty-pushing Rand Paul for the nomination.
Ted Cruz is who I want to run.
bluegill on March 20, 2013 at 8:30 PM
No, he doesn’t.
Rand Paul is for amnesty. Many people, myself included, supported Mitt during the primaries in part because of his position against illegal immigrant amnesty.
bluegill on March 20, 2013 at 8:32 PM
And when Ted Cruz endorses Rand Paul…?
JohnGalt23 on March 20, 2013 at 8:34 PM
I don’t give a rat’s behind who endorses whom. And it will be the amnesty-pushing Rand who will endorse Cruz.
bluegill on March 20, 2013 at 8:38 PM
Why compromise and vote for a pro-amnesty, Chuck Hagel-voting, anti-E Verify guy like Rand if there is a real option like Cruz? You might as well vote for Lindsay Graham.
Lets go, Cruz! Please run.
bluegill on March 20, 2013 at 8:41 PM
.
No
Mike OMalley on March 20, 2013 at 8:43 PM
Oh hell no.
rich801 on March 20, 2013 at 9:07 PM
Just a hunch, but I’m estimating the libertarian-conservative part of the GOP some multiple of 10%. Maybe 25-35%. Not hard core libertarians like Ron Paul, but practical libertarians like Rand Paul.
petefrt on March 20, 2013 at 8:29 PM
I tend to believe it’s larger than that, because libertarianism is a theoretical ideal that is approached but never reached. I vote GOP because they trend more to that ideal.
John the Libertarian on March 20, 2013 at 9:09 PM
What does Mitt have to do with this? He mentioned Palin, Ron Paul, civil libertarians and pot legalizers. Mitt is none of those things, so why did you even bring him up?
cptacek on March 20, 2013 at 9:22 PM
I thought Ronulan referred to Romney.
Regardless, it doesn’t change the fact that…
A vote for the amnesty-pushing Rand Paul is a vote for Lindsay Graham.
bluegill on March 20, 2013 at 9:31 PM
Yea a one issue voter…
Never mind that Mitt was for nationalized health care, gun control, and in general was a complete establishment hack…but he was for “self deportation”. See you supported him because he used one word…and ignored the “self” part.
William Eaton on March 20, 2013 at 9:51 PM
Absolutely, he can and hopefully will win.
Panther on March 20, 2013 at 10:26 PM
Rubio and Cruz competing in the same primary? Just imagine the melt down from the birther movement.
HarryBackside on March 20, 2013 at 10:29 PM