“What I did see at CPAC was the rise of the libertarian strand of Republicanism”
“First, here’s The New York Times headline on the CPAC conference: ‘GOP divisions fester at conservative retreat,’” Will said. “Festering an infected wound — it’s awful. I guarantee you, if there were a liberal conclave comparable to this, and there were vigorous debates going on there, The New York Times headline would be ‘Healthy diversity flourishes at the liberal conclave.’”
“Republicans have been arguing — social conservatives and libertarian free-market conservatives — since the 1950s, when the National Review was founded on the idea of the fusion of the two,” he continued. “It has worked before with Ronald Reagan. It can work again. What I did see at CPAC was the rise of the libertarian strand of Republicanism, which has an affected foreign policy that is a pullback from nation-building and other ambitions aboard that they never countenance from government at home, and a sense of ‘live and let live’ with subjects such as decriminalization of certain drugs and gay marriage.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Lets just put it on the table and say it.
“We’re tired of working hard so those that don’t can have an equal outcome”
The “Grasshopper and the Ant” analogy someone used the other day should be regarded as a prophecy in the welfare communities.
Winter is coming.
BobMbx on March 18, 2013 at 1:05 PM
What we all saw was the rise of freedom. Live and let live. It’s not the government’s damn business, no matter who is in charge.
beatcanvas on March 18, 2013 at 1:05 PM
“Legislating morality” (to use a very loaded phrase) is much more effective on the state and local level than the federal.
Jeddite on March 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM
What I saw at CPAC was a bunch of hipster cool kids giving out free t-shirts and signs in order to interrupt the audience at Rubio’s speech
blammm on March 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM
But look what azzhole Shapiro saw.
Schadenfreude on March 18, 2013 at 1:20 PM
The rise of the LIBERTARIAN – from the right and the left – it’s happening
jake-the-goose on March 18, 2013 at 1:26 PM
Maybe Libertarianism is the future of the Republican Party. God knows the true conservative believers are hoping (and in some cases actively working) for the Party to implode–there are few Republicans they don’t dislike, even Marco Rubio who they feel has betrayed them on immigration has been subject of derision of late.
You can’t build a national party around Ted Cruz and Queen Sarah, but the rightwingers are welcome to try.
With the Dems growing government in leaps and bounds, and overreaching Bloomberg-style into more and more aspects of daily life, the libertarians certainly aren’t going to gravitate to their side. The Republicans who realize a big-tent approach is not only advisable but necessary should try to stake out common ground with the “wacko birds.”
Meredith on March 18, 2013 at 1:36 PM
Good … it’s about time. I think many conservatives are finally seeing the light – that, if you want to cut government – if you REALLY want it out of your life then it means NOT USING it for your own agenda.
Not using it to enforce your own view of morality on others – because when you create a government that does that – eventually YOU end up on the outside with other enforcing THEIR WILL on you.
HondaV65 on March 18, 2013 at 1:46 PM
Exactly right – we need inspiring, charasmatic establishment types like John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, John Cornyn, and Reece’s “Hey lets move the convention timeframe” Pieces.
Don’t let them fool ya! Old and tired highly estrogenic White Men are a turn on to the American voter!!
Ted Cruse … Sarah … Rand … get the f*** outta the way!!
/S
HondaV65 on March 18, 2013 at 1:49 PM
I’m an independent with “republitarian” leanings. I actually support limited government in both foreign policy, taxes, regulation and in the personal lives of people. While I might agree with others decisions or choices it is not my right to tell them how to live. If there is a god, well I guess they go to hell if that’s what you believe. Unless they are hurting someone else, it’s non of my business.
I also believe in a strong military that defends the United States, the Bill of Rights and their citizens. A perfect example was when Cubans were occupying Grenada – and US medical students were held. We went in, got the students and left. We didn’t stay to rebuild the Island, train their military or build schools.
However, the choice to put US troops in Lebanon was a disaster. It didn’t concern Americans or our borders or freedoms. Luckily Reagan realized it and got us out, although his decision cost many Marines their lives.
MoreLiberty on March 18, 2013 at 1:50 PM
You don’t build it around a politician. You build it around the idea of liberty.
MoreLiberty on March 18, 2013 at 1:52 PM
I’ve read your comments through the elections. I’m curious what someone like you, someone I perceive to be more conservative, thinks about the actual future of the Republicans.
smoothsailing on March 18, 2013 at 1:53 PM
Don’t engage him. He throws spitballs, and just as effectively as any 3rd grader does. If you asked him to build you a house, he’d ridicule lumber.
beatcanvas on March 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM
As a libertarian, I’m far more tolerant of social cons than they are of me. Why is that? Does the Bible tell them so?
John the Libertarian on March 18, 2013 at 2:06 PM
Excellent read by Bryan Preston
Schadenfreude on March 18, 2013 at 2:09 PM
I’m sure people will say the same thing about me. Seems like a common theme to shun folks here now. A thread over the weekend was pretty much destroyed because of it. I’ll take my chances if its all the same.
smoothsailing on March 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM
John the Libertarian on March 18, 2013 at 2:06 PM
You’re one of the exceptions.
smoothsailing on March 18, 2013 at 2:16 PM
For most socons, it’s not enough to live their lives according to their own Christian standards – they have to make sure everyone else does, as well. As for those who refuse, they feel it’s their right as socons to use gov’t to sweep all the icky evidence deep under the rug – or shove it back into the closet, at the very least.
I hope we’re seeing a Republican Party lean more and more to the libertarian side. There is a deep strain of hypocrisy between limited government and social conservatism, and it’s time for resolution.
A lot of people are too young to remember, but there was a time when socons were happy to vote for big govt, progressive liberal Dems like Carter and LBJ. It was only after they went all-in for Roe v. Wade and Reagan called for its repeal that they switched sides.
DRayRaven on March 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM
Is the same government going to force me to accept a progressive concept of morality? Legislate it?
smoothsailing on March 18, 2013 at 2:24 PM