The new RNC report proves that compassionate conservatism is back
And at its core, the report is a glimpse of the party Karl Rove and George W. Bush, assisted by figures like Fleischer and Gerson, sought to create starting in the late 1990s. This was the party in which George W. Bush was elected, but one whose message shifted dramatically on September 11, 2001. From there, Bush ran almost exclusively as a national security president, and by the time he began pitching elements of Social Security privatization in his second term, the move was a non-sequitur and came with none of the halo of compassion of the earlier Bush years. The Tea Party represented a wing of the party — which included some, but certainly not all, of Bush’s own aides — who saw the ostentatious push for “compassion” as a veneer over policies that ought, they thought, to triumph on the merits; and who believed that the contrast with President Barack Obama meant that the veneer was no longer needed. Romney’s private suggestion of a class war between 53% of makers and 47% of takers in the American economy represented a particularly pure version of that.
Now, the Republican National Committee is returning to Bush’s original vision. The question is which policies — and in particular, what vision for solving poverty — will accompany that push.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Because it worked so well the first time?
Oil Can on March 18, 2013 at 2:17 PM
The RNC report can be summed up as “We need to do more of what lost us the elections of 2006, 2008, and 2012. We just need to cleverly dress it up as a change in direction.”
These guys just want to try to have a “do-over” of all the failed policies of the Bush administration.
Doomberg on March 18, 2013 at 2:17 PM
heheh….Too funny. The Republicans are probably still wondering why I tell them to shut up and leave me alone when they call for donations.
THAT IS WHY! I AM SICK OF VOTING FOR DEMOCRAT LITE.
PierreLegrand on March 18, 2013 at 2:20 PM
It proves this.
Jennifer Rubin is an enemy to the land. She should have suffocated from eating too much Romney shit.
Schadenfreude on March 18, 2013 at 2:21 PM
This is a Race to destruction.
portlandon on March 18, 2013 at 2:30 PM
Well, apparently, amnesty is the first policy that must be embraced. How that solves poverty is anybody’s guess.
Bitter Clinger on March 18, 2013 at 2:32 PM
Fabulous. /s
totherightofthem on March 18, 2013 at 2:52 PM
Poverty needs to be defined before you can work to eliminate it.
astonerii on March 18, 2013 at 3:16 PM
The GOP should just worry about the middle class, the taxpayers, and small business. Forget about both the Democrat ruling and under classes that are only interested in more government goodies.
Punchenko on March 18, 2013 at 3:26 PM
Translation: Big Business wants cheap labor.
Punchenko on March 18, 2013 at 3:30 PM
Is this a Jeb dog whistle?
Seriously, compassionate conservatism is very much like big government progressivism with just a little whining over the cost thrown in.
Fallon on March 18, 2013 at 3:48 PM
ssdd
The same people who have been selling us this same crap for forty years are tell us that what we really need is more of their crap.
29Victor on March 18, 2013 at 3:50 PM
They gave us For in ’76 and we lost.
They fought against Reagan in ’80 but we went around them and won.
They gave us moderate Bush in ’88.
They gave us Bush again in ’92 and he lost to Clinton.
They gave us Dole against President Charisma in ’96 and we lost.
They gave us Bush II in 2000 and he won! Now I love this guy but he spent like a liberal.
They gave us McCain in ’08 and Romney in ’12.
The only time we’ve gotten conservatives in office who made the changes we need are when ignored these tools in 1980 Reagan, in 1994 when Gingrich took the House and in ’10 when the Tea Partiers that they hated so much took back the House and put some darn good Republicans into the Senate.
Yet they keep lecturing us on how best to present ourselves and attack anyone who disagrees with them (unless, of course, he’s a Democrat).
29Victor on March 18, 2013 at 3:58 PM
Hurray for the neo-whig party!
FloatingRock on March 18, 2013 at 3:59 PM