<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: More voters care about &#8220;economic well-being&#8221; than debt and deficits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:28:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bgibbs1000</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-2297242</link>
		<dc:creator>bgibbs1000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=247343#comment-2297242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep and people care more about being warm than paying their heating bill.

No wonder we have the government we have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep and people care more about being warm than paying their heating bill.</p>
<p>No wonder we have the government we have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommyboy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-2297119</link>
		<dc:creator>tommyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=247343#comment-2297119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;and everyone ends up losing their precious government goodies(along with most of their life savings).
Doughboy on March 18, 2013 at 11:59 AM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;That could never happen here&quot; - signed, Cyprus depositors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>and everyone ends up losing their precious government goodies(along with most of their life savings).<br />
Doughboy on March 18, 2013 at 11:59 AM </p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;That could never happen here&#8221; &#8211; signed, Cyprus depositors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astonerii</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-2297084</link>
		<dc:creator>astonerii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=247343#comment-2297084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, people are unable to determine that the deficit and debt cause poor economy and jobs performance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, people are unable to determine that the deficit and debt cause poor economy and jobs performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rogue Tomato</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-2297062</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rogue Tomato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=247343#comment-2297062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because they&#039;re not thinking about how debt and deficits affect their economic well being.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they&#8217;re not thinking about how debt and deficits affect their economic well being.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoreLiberty</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-2297057</link>
		<dc:creator>MoreLiberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=247343#comment-2297057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe this, and it&#039;s sad.  They only have to look at Europe to see what is going to come.  The whole bank raid on those that save their money was a test, a test to see what the individual will do in response.  Here is what they are doing, they come out with a plan to tax 10% of savings for those accounts over 100K euros, and 6.75% for those under 100k euros.  Then when people complain that they are being robbed the establishment backs away just ever so slightly such as reducing it to 3% for those under 100K, and still 10% for those over 100K euros.  Then, instead of calling it what it really is, they call it a tax.  

People we all need to wake up.  Take your money out of banks, you&#039;re not making anything off of interest thanks to the Fed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this, and it&#8217;s sad.  They only have to look at Europe to see what is going to come.  The whole bank raid on those that save their money was a test, a test to see what the individual will do in response.  Here is what they are doing, they come out with a plan to tax 10% of savings for those accounts over 100K euros, and 6.75% for those under 100k euros.  Then when people complain that they are being robbed the establishment backs away just ever so slightly such as reducing it to 3% for those under 100K, and still 10% for those over 100K euros.  Then, instead of calling it what it really is, they call it a tax.  </p>
<p>People we all need to wake up.  Take your money out of banks, you&#8217;re not making anything off of interest thanks to the Fed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resist We Much</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-2297055</link>
		<dc:creator>Resist We Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=247343#comment-2297055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=24770.0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IMF&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;To restrain the U.S.’s future budget crisis, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MUST RAISE TAXES BY AT LEAST 35% AND CUT ENTITLEMENTS SUCH AS HEALTH CARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY BY 35%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, International Monetary Fund economists warned Monday in a new working paper.

While the projected ballooning of future costs of entitlements as the so-called baby boomer generation enters old age isn’t new, the IMF paper’s quantifying just how much the federal government will have trim its balance sheets sheds fresh light on the political hurdles ahead.

Raising taxes and cutting spending on health care, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are some of the most sensitive issues for voters.

The IMF paper, written by Nicoletta Batini, Giovanni Callegari and Julia Guerreiro, shows that &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;IF THE GOVERNMENT DOESN’T CUT ENTITLEMENTS, IT WILL HAVE TO RAISE TAXES BY 88% TO PAY FOR THEIR COSTS.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

Since the federal government has historically collected around 18% of gross domestic product in taxes, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;THE MANDATORY ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS MAY ABSORB ALL FEDERAL REVENUES AS EARLY AS 2026&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, when the cost of servicing the debt is included in the calculation, the economists say.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 The reactionary Left refuses to reform Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid even to save them and to give young Americans the same opportunities, shot at the American Dream, and living standards that their parents, grandparents and great-grandparents have had.

Sadly, too many on the Left are far more interested in &quot;getting theirs&quot;...and getting it now!  A recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2013/03/democrats-generational-theft.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;poll&lt;/a&gt; demonstrates this and does so in a devastating fashion:

&lt;blockquote&gt;“While a majority of Republicans (59%) thinks major cuts to entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare should be made now, even if it is tough on families, &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;A MAJORITY OF DEMOCRATS (52%) THINKS THOSE PROGRAMS SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE FUNDED AT THEIR CURRENT LEVELS, EVEN IF IT MEANS PASSING ON TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF DEBT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

Overall, 61% of voters say major spending cuts are necessary to reduce the deficit, while 33% think increasing taxes on high earners would be enough.  &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;HALF OF DEMOCRATS THINK TAXING THE RICH IS ALL THAT IS NEEDED.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;  By contrast, majorities of Republicans (77%) and independents (62%) think cutting spending is also necessary.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
It would appear that Democrats do not find generational theft to be immoral in the slightest bit.  How sad.

As Mark Levine states in his book, &lt;em&gt;Ameritopia&lt;/em&gt;, “The best that can be said is that all that stands between the individual and tyranny is a resolute and sober people.” Piling debt upon debt upon debt upon children and those yet born is anything but sober.  It is the action of an inebriated and immoral people...a people drunk on the fruits of the labours of others of which they have voted themselves because they are too lazy, contemptuous, hateful, vengeful, incapable, ignorant, and enfeebled to work for themselves.  They have been enchained by their &quot;betters&quot; and do not know it.  They and their betters seek temporary satiation in the present at the expense of future generations, who will be subjected to a lengthy pain and far fewer freedoms.  

A little more than two centuries ago, people declared their independence and went to war over &quot;taxation without representation.&quot;   Those that seek to place burdens on the future, should remember this because I, somehow, doubt that they will find themselves living in a life of luxury financed by younger workers, as they believe.  In fact, if the selfishness, ADD, and self-absorption of today&#039;s younger generations are any indication, those death panels - the kind spoken of by George Bernard Shaw, not Sarah Palin - will be in place a lot sooner than anyone ever imagined.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2013/03/dont-tax-away-future-imf-to-contain.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Don&#039;t Tax Away The Future! IMF: To Contain Future Budget, US Must Raise Taxes By 35%, Cut Entitlements 35%; Without Cuts, Taxes Must Rise By 88%!&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the <a href="http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=24770.0" rel="nofollow">IMF</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>To restrain the U.S.’s future budget crisis, <strong><em>THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MUST RAISE TAXES BY AT LEAST 35% AND CUT ENTITLEMENTS SUCH AS HEALTH CARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY BY 35%</em></strong>, International Monetary Fund economists warned Monday in a new working paper.</p>
<p>While the projected ballooning of future costs of entitlements as the so-called baby boomer generation enters old age isn’t new, the IMF paper’s quantifying just how much the federal government will have trim its balance sheets sheds fresh light on the political hurdles ahead.</p>
<p>Raising taxes and cutting spending on health care, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are some of the most sensitive issues for voters.</p>
<p>The IMF paper, written by Nicoletta Batini, Giovanni Callegari and Julia Guerreiro, shows that <strong><em>IF THE GOVERNMENT DOESN’T CUT ENTITLEMENTS, IT WILL HAVE TO RAISE TAXES BY 88% TO PAY FOR THEIR COSTS.</em></strong></p>
<p>Since the federal government has historically collected around 18% of gross domestic product in taxes, <strong><em>THE MANDATORY ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS MAY ABSORB ALL FEDERAL REVENUES AS EARLY AS 2026</em></strong>, when the cost of servicing the debt is included in the calculation, the economists say.</p></blockquote>
<p> The reactionary Left refuses to reform Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid even to save them and to give young Americans the same opportunities, shot at the American Dream, and living standards that their parents, grandparents and great-grandparents have had.</p>
<p>Sadly, too many on the Left are far more interested in &#8220;getting theirs&#8221;&#8230;and getting it now!  A recent <a href="http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2013/03/democrats-generational-theft.html" rel="nofollow">poll</a> demonstrates this and does so in a devastating fashion:</p>
<blockquote><p>“While a majority of Republicans (59%) thinks major cuts to entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare should be made now, even if it is tough on families, <strong><em>A MAJORITY OF DEMOCRATS (52%) THINKS THOSE PROGRAMS SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE FUNDED AT THEIR CURRENT LEVELS, EVEN IF IT MEANS PASSING ON TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF DEBT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS.</em></strong></p>
<p>Overall, 61% of voters say major spending cuts are necessary to reduce the deficit, while 33% think increasing taxes on high earners would be enough.  <strong><em>HALF OF DEMOCRATS THINK TAXING THE RICH IS ALL THAT IS NEEDED.</em></strong>  By contrast, majorities of Republicans (77%) and independents (62%) think cutting spending is also necessary.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It would appear that Democrats do not find generational theft to be immoral in the slightest bit.  How sad.</p>
<p>As Mark Levine states in his book, <em>Ameritopia</em>, “The best that can be said is that all that stands between the individual and tyranny is a resolute and sober people.” Piling debt upon debt upon debt upon children and those yet born is anything but sober.  It is the action of an inebriated and immoral people&#8230;a people drunk on the fruits of the labours of others of which they have voted themselves because they are too lazy, contemptuous, hateful, vengeful, incapable, ignorant, and enfeebled to work for themselves.  They have been enchained by their &#8220;betters&#8221; and do not know it.  They and their betters seek temporary satiation in the present at the expense of future generations, who will be subjected to a lengthy pain and far fewer freedoms.  </p>
<p>A little more than two centuries ago, people declared their independence and went to war over &#8220;taxation without representation.&#8221;   Those that seek to place burdens on the future, should remember this because I, somehow, doubt that they will find themselves living in a life of luxury financed by younger workers, as they believe.  In fact, if the selfishness, ADD, and self-absorption of today&#8217;s younger generations are any indication, those death panels &#8211; the kind spoken of by George Bernard Shaw, not Sarah Palin &#8211; will be in place a lot sooner than anyone ever imagined.</p>
<p><a href="http://predicthistunpredictpast.blogspot.com/2013/03/dont-tax-away-future-imf-to-contain.html" rel="nofollow">Don&#8217;t Tax Away The Future! IMF: To Contain Future Budget, US Must Raise Taxes By 35%, Cut Entitlements 35%; Without Cuts, Taxes Must Rise By 88%!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebrokenrattle</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-2297050</link>
		<dc:creator>thebrokenrattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=247343#comment-2297050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well of course, you can&#039;t secure tomorrow if today is insecure and Obama has done little to help regular people feel more secure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well of course, you can&#8217;t secure tomorrow if today is insecure and Obama has done little to help regular people feel more secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doughboy</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-2297047</link>
		<dc:creator>Doughboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=247343#comment-2297047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Asked to choose one government program they would be willing to cut, only 14 percent of respondents named Social Security or Medicare. Just over three quarters – 76 percent – picked military spending or other, unspecified “welfare programs.”
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Like we needed a new poll to tell us what we already know? Voters love fiscal discipline....until you ask them to give something up. Then suddenly they revert to wanting cuts in military spending, foreign aid, or now &quot;unspecified welfare programs&quot;. I don&#039;t even know what the hell the latter means. We either tackle the big entitlements like Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and now Obamacare, or we sit back, watch the entire system collapse, and everyone ends up losing their precious government goodies(along with most of their life savings).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Asked to choose one government program they would be willing to cut, only 14 percent of respondents named Social Security or Medicare. Just over three quarters – 76 percent – picked military spending or other, unspecified “welfare programs.”
</p></blockquote>
<p>Like we needed a new poll to tell us what we already know? Voters love fiscal discipline&#8230;.until you ask them to give something up. Then suddenly they revert to wanting cuts in military spending, foreign aid, or now &#8220;unspecified welfare programs&#8221;. I don&#8217;t even know what the hell the latter means. We either tackle the big entitlements like Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and now Obamacare, or we sit back, watch the entire system collapse, and everyone ends up losing their precious government goodies(along with most of their life savings).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resist We Much</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/03/18/poll-more-voters-care-about-economic-well-being-than-debt-and-deficits/comment-page-1/#comment-2297039</link>
		<dc:creator>Resist We Much</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=247343#comment-2297039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Poll: More voters care about “economic well-being” than debt and deficits&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As if they are mutually exclusive.

Stupid Americans, look at Europe!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Poll: More voters care about “economic well-being” than debt and deficits</p></blockquote>
<p>As if they are mutually exclusive.</p>
<p>Stupid Americans, look at Europe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>