Did the Iraq war give birth to the Arab Spring?
The Arab Spring was going to happen with or without Saddam Hussein, but it would not have happened had it not been for the attacks of September 11. In fact, in many ways the Iraq War has prevented more from being done to aid the uprisings, hindering global resolve in attending to the killing fields of the full-blown civil war in Syria.
It is the ghost of Iraq that prevents the U.S. from leading attempts to topple the brutal Assad regime in Damascus. Regime change has consequences, as we learned in Iraq. There will be no new commitments to “nation build” again, or re-train police and security forces in a far off Arab land.
The sectarianism, tribalism, Jihadism, border skirmishes and threat of chemical weapons use in Syria reminds U.S. policymakers of the American and Arab blood and treasure sacrificed in Iraq. And to what avail?
The ongoing loss of life in Syria is a direct result of U.S. foreign policy blunders in Iraq. Syrians are the victims of America’s Iraq adventure. So as we ponder the last decade and current Arab uprisings, let us not gloat about the “success” of Iraq. Iraq is not a success. It is now an ally of Iran, home to a prime minister who persecutes his own political opposition, and unashamedly supports the Assad regime in Syria. Egyptians, Yemenis, Libyans, and Tunisians were not inspired by America in Iraq.








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Islam sucks.
Get used to it.
No matter what America does or does not do.
Islam still sucks.
profitsbeard on March 17, 2013 at 8:37 PM
No. Islamism and it’s useful idiots were the wellspring of the Arab Teased-Spring Winter
thebrokenrattle on March 17, 2013 at 8:43 PM
Does resisting terrorists give birth to more of them?
Do police give birth to more criminals?
petefrt on March 17, 2013 at 8:48 PM
Yes and no. Yes in that it left a vacuum for Islamism to fill. No in that it was the main cause.
nobar on March 17, 2013 at 8:51 PM
The replies on the CNN page show why progs are the most useless Americans ever produced.
They cannot even comprehend which this writer is stating.
He directly says Iraq is not responsible for the Arab Spring.
But the lunatics read a headline and go off.
It’s more proof for that recent Gallup study, which showed the online political sphere is off-the-charts disproportionately representative of the prog community.
They really are psychologically unhinged. I know we joke about it, but its apparent web communication for progs is more than confirmation bias, but some desperate attempt for validation by groupthink.
budfox on March 17, 2013 at 8:56 PM
Riiiiight. Boooosh did it! What a load of nonsense. Another way to think of it: carving out a democracy in Iraq was the region’s last hope. Otherwise, we nuke it from orbit.
John the Libertarian on March 17, 2013 at 9:20 PM
We should have gone in, destroyed the place while working to kill Saddam, then left. PERIOD!
Mission accomplished!
DannoJyd on March 18, 2013 at 4:22 AM
Old Left Mantra: The Arab Spring is like the American Founders!
New Left Mantra: The Arab Spring is Bush’s fault!
ajacksonian on March 18, 2013 at 7:17 AM