A reply to Rand Paul about “the GOP of old”
Now we’re weary again. And there are many politicians all too willing to seek power and popularity by encouraging weariness rather than point out its perils. Foremost among those politicians is our current president. It’s hard to blame the American people for some degree of war weariness when their president downplays threats and is eager to shirk international responsibilities. The rot of war weariness begins at the top. One can’t, for example, be surprised at the ebbing support of the American public for the war in Afghanistan years after the president stopped trying to mobilize their support, stopped heralding the successes of the troops he’d sent there, and stopped explaining the importance of their mission.
That task of Republicans is to confront Obama on his irresponsibility, not compete with him. The task of a serious opposition party is to rally the nation to its responsibilities and long-term interests. The task of GOP political leaders is to educate the public about the dangers of the world and to inspire people to rise above their weariness. The task of American conservatives is not to let an understandable Obama-weariness turn into weariness in fighting the nation’s enemies or in supporting our troops in the field.
It fell to a freshman congressman, speaking at CPAC on the same day as Rand Paul, to tell some hard truths. “I know there is war weariness among the American people, just like there is war weariness among conservatives, and in this audience, no doubt,” said Tom Cotton from Yell County, Arkansas. “It’s no surprise, though, that the American people are war weary when their commander in chief is the weariest of them all.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
bill, talk about the ‘of old’ thing! You are as nasty to conservatives as rove?
I don’t even listen to either of you any longer. Sorry I did this time.
L
letget on March 16, 2013 at 4:31 PM
Congressman Tom Cotton should be forewarned: Kristol’s M.O. is to build you up to tear you down when the opponent is chosen. Who’s always then smarter, slicker, and more serious than you.
Marcus on March 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM
Yeah, because endless military adventurism is the responsible thing to do when we’re 17 trillion dollars in debt and we can’t even afford to refuel our aircraft carriers. /sarc
Walter Sobchak on March 16, 2013 at 4:44 PM
The State MUST grow, right Bill?
aryeung on March 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM
Weak
forest on March 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM
I didn’t expect Kristol to make the halfway-decent point that he did:
It’s true that if we pull out, Islamists will construe it as victory and it will embolden them and make them crazier, and 20 years later, if we have a disaster that dwarfs 9/11, our descendants will judge us for our perceived “weakness” in not dealing with the threat that killed many thousands when we had the chance, because a few politicians (who will likely be the “stale and moss-covered” establishment, at that point) begged and pleaded to “bring the troops home.”
I may agree with Rand Paul somewhat on the topic of what is often derided as “military adventurism,” but it’s still a lot to think about in terms of what far-reaching consequences there might be.
mintycrys on March 16, 2013 at 4:53 PM
The domestic enemies residing in this country are far more dangerous than the ragtag islamists. That’s what many seem to be forgetting.
Pitchforker on March 16, 2013 at 5:03 PM
And, of course, the enemies in this country are the ones funding the ragtag Islamists. Oh, isn’t that just swell.
If only Bill Kristol could find the motivation to point out Obama’s foreign policy of paying off some pretty dangerous Islamic regimes (ahem, Egypt). But, no. Rand Paul is the real danger here.
aryeung on March 16, 2013 at 5:06 PM
I’m not even sure what “win” is supposed to look like in Afghanistan.
S. Weasel on March 16, 2013 at 5:06 PM
Karzai not bad-mouthing the US? I don’t know either!
aryeung on March 16, 2013 at 5:07 PM
Ah, much better.
Punchenko on March 16, 2013 at 5:09 PM
The name of the next Star Wars movie should be:
Neocons Strike Back: Bobba Farts vs. Young Padawans
Ladysmith CulchaVulcha on March 16, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Kristol and his buddies have been really helpful the last two elections, we should listen to him.
rndmusrnm on March 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM
Do I think Rand Paul believes radical Islam is as dangerous as I do?
No.
Do I think chickenhawks like Bill Kristol and the rest of the GOP establishment have the slightest clue — not to mention the stomach — to do what needs to be done to defeat them?
No.
So I think I’ll go with the guy who thinks we should stop tossing a few thousand dead American soldiers at the problem every once in awhile — until we find a guy who is willing to take on the evil ideology itself.
Rational Thought on March 16, 2013 at 5:59 PM
To support his neocon position I don’t think Krystol should rely on his Vietnam analogy. We should have stayed in Vietnam? That’s got to be the minority 1% position. What, should we still be fighting the Vietnam War today? Insane. If you want us to stay in Afganistan, talk about Afganistan, not Vietnam. But he didn’t seem to talk about Afganistan.
anotherJoe on March 16, 2013 at 6:16 PM
What is that importance Bill? Afghanistan is a strategic backwater of no importance to the United States. 9-11 happened because we let Jihadist come to the United States and we have a inept INS. In fact we still let them in.
Here is a novel idea….limit, monitor and restrict the amount of Muslims allowed into the country just like we limited, monitored, and restricted communists, Nazis, loyalists and all sorts of other people with goof ball ideologies from getting into the country over the years.
William Eaton on March 16, 2013 at 7:15 PM
Billy please go join the democrat party. You belong there.
bgibbs1000 on March 16, 2013 at 7:23 PM