In this present time, sustainable conservatism
Even as Washington settles into another battle over the budget, an increasing number of conservative writers (and a few elected officials) are becoming aware of the fact that anti-government platitudes are losing their electoral punch and of the need for conservatism to be about more than the budget. Now is probably not the space to give a laundry list of the names of pundits who have considered conservative reform, but it might be worthwhile to turn to a recent online debate between Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey and the Daily Caller’s Matt Lewis as revealing two major trends for the future of conservatism—and to look at what a synthesis of these approaches could mean.
Lewis has suggested the value of a return to a “compassionate conservatism,” one that would go beyond celebrating selfishness to think of our broader commitments to one another. This interest in rehabilitating compassionate conservatism can be seen more widely on certain parts of the right (Peter Wehner’s and Michael Gerson’s recent cover story in Commentary, for instance, seems informed by this impulse). Morrissey has proposed instead the value of a “practical conservatism,” which would focus on reforming rather than blowing up many of the institutions that have become central to American public life since the New Deal (such as Social Security). This theme also percolates throughout various sectors of the reformist wing of the right. Perhaps I might pose a synthesizing variant of these two: “sustainable conservatism.” The goal of such a conservatism would involve nurturing the public and private institutions and tendencies that help sustain a free republic. It seems as though maintaining a free republic demands, among other things, faith in government and the rule of law, a sense of civic participation, a belief in personal freedom, virtue on the part of its citizens (and especially its government officials), and some kind of wisdom or prudence. Sustainable conservatism would seek to foster these tendencies in order to renew the civic compact.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
No, no and NO.
astonerii on March 14, 2013 at 8:15 PM
Can’t we all just agree that our government in its present form is NOT SUSTAINABLE???
“Compasionate Conservatism” is more properly called “Conservative Capitulation.” The people pushing this are useful idiots who are serving the left.
landlines on March 14, 2013 at 8:42 PM
While watching news coverage before the Pope was chosen, Matthew Dowd said that he hoped the Cardinals would choose someone who could make the church more “relative in today’s world”. Now here we have a man who will be on this earth for maybe 80 years telling the Catholic church, which has been around since the time of Christ, that they are not “relative”. That’s rich.
I think the same thing when I hear all these pundits and politicians lament about what conservatism is or should be. Conservatism is what it is. It is a belief in the right of the individual. It is the belief that government should be small and that the power lies not in Washington, but with the people. Conservatism espouses self reliance and self determination. Liberty and freedom and charity are conservative principles. Conservatism is optimistic. Liberals put faith in an authoritative government and Conservatives put their faith in God. Conservatives want to conserve and preserve the constitution while liberals want to shred it and make it “more relevant.” Those who want to change conservatism are trying to redefine the term for their own purposes. It is what it is. Reagan espoused it unapologetically and won in two landslides. It really isn’t that hard. It just takes courage.
fight like a girl on March 14, 2013 at 9:17 PM
That’s the key and without a moral foundation, you’ll never have those two, all the knowledge in the world notwithstanding. A republic if we can keep it. That’s what conservatism is. I’ve been down the rabbit hole of compassionate conservatism, it’s just another modus for the government to enlarge itself – Bush 43 is testament to that crap.
AH_C on March 14, 2013 at 10:40 PM