In making a play for the House, Obama could lose the Senate
If Obama’s job-approval ratings remain below 50 percent in 2014, the chances increase that the Senate will be in play. Next year’s electorate could look more like 2010 than 2012 — the consequence of a boom-bust cycle, when the Democrats’ base turns out for Obama, but not for downballot Democrats. The president will be a valuable asset helping the party committees fundraise, but he won’t be welcome in most of the key Senate battlegrounds.
Midterms are rarely favorable to second-term presidents, and this one is unlikely to be an exception. Democrats can’t afford to lose more than five Senate seats (net), and the party is defending seven seats in states that Mitt Romney carried, six of them by double-digit margins. Mobilizing base support on behalf of the president’s pet issues, such as gun control and immigration, will do more harm than good in these conservative strongholds, where Obama is deeply unpopular…
But given Obama’s decidedly liberal positioning to start his second term, the prospect of a midterm GOP wave is very real. The Supreme Court is taking up the hot-button social issues of gay marriage and affirmative action, raising the likelihood of an aggravated conservative base in Republican strongholds. In Southern states, Democrats benefited from high African-American turnout in 2008, which is unlikely to be replicated for the 2014 midterms. And even the best-staffed campaign committee can’t alter forces out of their control. Just ask former DCCC Chairman Chris Van Hollen, who presided over major House gains in 2008 and historic losses two years later.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
and if the house goes dem and the senate goes gop, what goes around comes around…no votes on any bill passed by the house
if harry can get away with for a term why not the gop
cmsinaz on March 8, 2013 at 8:08 PM
Goin’ down in flames.
/Don’t try this stunt with America again.
Key West Reader on March 8, 2013 at 8:15 PM
I’m fairly sick of political outcomes being wrongly portrayed as a result of military tactics rather than public sentiment through wretched abuse of metaphor. Obama isn’t going to lose the Senate through “focusing” on the House any more than Dukakis lost because he got in the tank. Crap like that is just an excuse made by talking heads who, through conscious or unconscious bias, need a reason for why their guy lost.
You’ll notice Republicans only ever lose because of public rejection.
With all that said, any meme that puts an early kibosh on the Nancy Pelosi Guarantee for this cycle is not a bad meme.
HitNRun on March 8, 2013 at 8:23 PM
By 2014 if the economy remains the same, the Dems will have 7+ years with majority control…here’s hoping by then even the Libiots will give them majority blame..
hillsoftx on March 8, 2013 at 9:03 PM
Obama’s base traditionally does not vote in great numbers. It is his appearance on the ballot that has got them out to the polls. Obama will not be on the ballot in 2014. There better be some massive GOP GOTV effort in 2014.
Democrats will also experience some backlash from issues such as second amendment fights. Places like Colorado might see considerable blowback for the Democrats.
crosspatch on March 8, 2013 at 9:44 PM
Uh uh…I’m going to be full Allah-Eeyore till the mid-term votes are counted and the inevitable Democrat election-stealing attempts have been shaken out. We should have won the Senate in ’12 regardless of Obama on the ticket. Missouri, Indiana should have gone red and Reps pulled defeat from the jaws of victory and have shown no sign they’re gonna do better next go-round.
Rogue on March 8, 2013 at 9:54 PM