…and abolish gays. Got it.

Mmm…Burritos on February 27, 2013 at 5:01 PM

Like theft, murder, rape, incest, jay walking and speeding, the goal is just to marginalize and minimize. Only the end of the world can abolish it.

What about people that smoke tobacco, drink alcohol and eat fried foods? It’s their personal choice to do so and we as a society pick up the tab for their resulting medical bills. Where’s your constitutional amendment banning those or will the Astonerii dictatorship only create laws mandating acceptable bedroom behavior among consenting adults? Are you aware that America has laws that prevent that kind rape from metastasizing.

Regardless, I nominate you for CPAC keynote speaker.

Mmm…Burritos on February 27, 2013 at 4:53 PM

If it were illegal right now in our current welfare state, I would work to keep them illegal. I am not looking to reduce what freedoms are already present, just limit those that I can and hope we eventually get a majority who wants to dismantle the welfare state.

Looking at the medicaid and medicare rolls, it seems that gay men are an extraordinarily huge burden on my labors (got statistical or just an opinion from the 1940s). That burden is 100% on their choice of activities.

What about people that smoke tobacco, drink alcohol and eat fried foods? It’s their personal choice to do so and we as a society pick up the tab for their resulting medical bills. Where’s your constitutional amendment banning those or will the Astonerii dictatorship only create laws mandating acceptable bedroom behavior among consenting adults? Are you aware that America has laws that prevent that kind rape from metastasizing.

Regardless, I nominate you for CPAC keynote speaker.

You win.

Mmm…Burritos on February 27, 2013 at 4:37 PM

Of course.
but you put up a good fight. I am sure you can pick any of a number of conciliatory prizes on your way out.

astonerii on February 27, 2013 at 4:41 PM

Hmmm, I actually changed my mind. You put up a progressive fight. It is only legitimate to split a paragraph the way you did, but the two sentences you used were in two different paragraphs, even separated by another paragraph.

It might have just been laziness on your part, but it does deduct points on style for you… You can only pick from the bottom row!

You win.

Mmm…Burritos on February 27, 2013 at 4:37 PM

Of course.
but you put up a good fight. I am sure you can pick any of a number of conciliatory prizes on your way out.

Fudge pounding another guy I consider as a bad activity…I have have plenty of information to make said judgement.

You win.

So, you are ok with gays as long as they do not have sex and they get back in the closet. Wow. How nice of you to give them that much leeway, instead of simply stoning them to death. Your tolerance is much appreciated.

Irritable Pundit on February 27, 2013 at 4:25 PM

No problem, if nothing else, I am a totally reasonable person when it comes to personal choice that results PERSONAL CONSEQUENCE. We do not impose personal consequence in this nation. You only have freedom when people are personally responsible. When they are not, then their failures are a burden on everyone else.

Looking at the medicaid and medicare rolls, it seems that gay men are an extraordinarily huge burden on my labors. That burden is 100% on their choice of activities.

Fudge pounding another guy I consider as a bad activity. Spreading AIDS and every other disease rampantly I consider a bad activity. Feel free to argue that I do not have the freedom to my opinion and the ability to speak them, GO AHEAD! I will not be shamed from exposing degenerate behavior as degenerate behavior.

Gays who chose to remain abstinent and otherwise out of public purview are just fine and dandy with me. Those who do not, deserve my scorn and ridicule.

astonerii on February 27, 2013 at 3:39 PM

So, you are ok with gays as long as they do not have sex and they get back in the closet. Wow. How nice of you to give them that much leeway, instead of simply stoning them to death. Your tolerance is much appreciated.

Actually, everybody in Oklahoma who is paying the least bit of attention knows that Lucas is the most librul of the entire house and senate delegation. However, it is lup to his constituents to either return him or retire him, not club for growth, dhimocrapts, or the numbnums that are to the right of the paulistas that don’t live in his district. That is the way we are down here. CFG – big mistake.

Old Country Boy on February 27, 2013 at 3:36 PM

I’m not in OK, but agree with you that the residents of his district should decide. That should be the way for all of the States.

There are many in Congress that don’t vote in the interest of our Country and the American People. I don’t have the time to search each one’s voting record and most don’t. We’ll see how Club for Growth proceeds with this. Nothing wrong with knowing their voting records. If we know any that have worse, we can suggest they add them:-)