<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Onion was wrong but it shouldn&#8217;t have apologized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282477</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Sorry, but the joke wouldn’t have worked as well had they....

bluegill on February 26, 2013 at 9:14 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It worked well?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sorry, but the joke wouldn’t have worked as well had they&#8230;.</p>
<p>bluegill on February 26, 2013 at 9:14 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>It worked well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282476</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you want a list of people the Onion has offended over the past 10 years? There have been several just as bad as this. This is the only time they have ever apologized though.

WisCon on February 26, 2013 at 8:25 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Just the 9-year-olds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Do you want a list of people the Onion has offended over the past 10 years? There have been several just as bad as this. This is the only time they have ever apologized though.</p>
<p>WisCon on February 26, 2013 at 8:25 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Just the 9-year-olds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282475</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ace has a post today about liberals not laughing at Malkin&#039;s mockery of Michelle Obama. They can lodge the same complaint, that we are just being mean-spirited about Michelle&#039;s light-hearted antics. You think Letterman&#039;s joke didn&#039;t work. But you assert he was really just saying what he believed, so not a joke at all. So your distinctions all seem very subjective. Letterman&#039;s jokes were over the line because of what you think of his diseased mind...but the Onion joke because the joker is just a funny guy. It&#039;s a very weak argument you&#039;re making.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ace has a post today about liberals not laughing at Malkin&#8217;s mockery of Michelle Obama. They can lodge the same complaint, that we are just being mean-spirited about Michelle&#8217;s light-hearted antics. You think Letterman&#8217;s joke didn&#8217;t work. But you assert he was really just saying what he believed, so not a joke at all. So your distinctions all seem very subjective. Letterman&#8217;s jokes were over the line because of what you think of his diseased mind&#8230;but the Onion joke because the joker is just a funny guy. It&#8217;s a very weak argument you&#8217;re making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluegill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282469</link>
		<dc:creator>bluegill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Good point MikeknaJ, I don’t remember so many conservatives finding the Palin children jokes so worthy of defense.
Crispian on February 26, 2013 at 9:40 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For Letterman&#039;s joke to work, you have to agree with his assumption that the Palin daughter (yeah, he meant to refer to the older one) is a low class, hillbilly sl*t.

For the Onion&#039;s joke to work, you have to recognize the obvious fact that that young actress should never be called that word.

Letterman&#039;s joke was mean-spirited, the Onion&#039;s wasn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Good point MikeknaJ, I don’t remember so many conservatives finding the Palin children jokes so worthy of defense.<br />
Crispian on February 26, 2013 at 9:40 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>For Letterman&#8217;s joke to work, you have to agree with his assumption that the Palin daughter (yeah, he meant to refer to the older one) is a low class, hillbilly sl*t.</p>
<p>For the Onion&#8217;s joke to work, you have to recognize the obvious fact that that young actress should never be called that word.</p>
<p>Letterman&#8217;s joke was mean-spirited, the Onion&#8217;s wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282457</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point MikeknaJ, I don&#039;t remember so many conservatives finding the Palin children jokes so worthy of defense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point MikeknaJ, I don&#8217;t remember so many conservatives finding the Palin children jokes so worthy of defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeknaJ</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282441</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeknaJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Sorry, but the joke wouldn’t have worked as well had they not referred to the young actress. Yes, the effect was jolting, and it may have been using absurdity to highlight the indefensible, out-of-control nature of much of the bashing of female actresses by online critics. This was the furthest thing from a mean-spirited joke. It seems, instead, to be criticizing the mean-spiritedness. 75% of the comments on this site are incredibly mean-spirited, though.

The Onion has always been great and continues to be great.

bluegill on February 26, 2013 at 9:14 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You can make that point without the C-word.

Do you wan to explain to your daughter why someone called her a C***? &quot;It&#039;s okay honey! A &quot;c***&quot; means this. But don&#039;t let it bother you. After all, The Onion is a brilliant satirical publication and their point was quite exquisite!&quot;

I&#039;m tired of this idea that &quot;satire&quot; excuses everything. It&#039;s what Bill Maher hides behind when he doesn&#039;t want to take responsibility for the things he says. It&#039;s just comedy, people! Republicans have no sense of humor! My jokes about Trig Palin are so insightful!

A truly brilliant satirist can make their point without stooping to this kind of dreck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Sorry, but the joke wouldn’t have worked as well had they not referred to the young actress. Yes, the effect was jolting, and it may have been using absurdity to highlight the indefensible, out-of-control nature of much of the bashing of female actresses by online critics. This was the furthest thing from a mean-spirited joke. It seems, instead, to be criticizing the mean-spiritedness. 75% of the comments on this site are incredibly mean-spirited, though.</p>
<p>The Onion has always been great and continues to be great.</p>
<p>bluegill on February 26, 2013 at 9:14 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>You can make that point without the C-word.</p>
<p>Do you wan to explain to your daughter why someone called her a C***? &#8220;It&#8217;s okay honey! A &#8220;c***&#8221; means this. But don&#8217;t let it bother you. After all, The Onion is a brilliant satirical publication and their point was quite exquisite!&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tired of this idea that &#8220;satire&#8221; excuses everything. It&#8217;s what Bill Maher hides behind when he doesn&#8217;t want to take responsibility for the things he says. It&#8217;s just comedy, people! Republicans have no sense of humor! My jokes about Trig Palin are so insightful!</p>
<p>A truly brilliant satirist can make their point without stooping to this kind of dreck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluegill</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282430</link>
		<dc:creator>bluegill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 02:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Nope. The real mistake was thinking using a 9 year old CHILD was an appropriate subject for their “satire” attempt.
She’s a CHILD. What part of that is so hard to understand?
MikeknaJ on February 26, 2013 at 8:39 PM
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry, but the joke wouldn&#039;t have worked as well had they not referred to the young actress. Yes, the effect was jolting, and it may have been using absurdity to highlight the indefensible, out-of-control nature of much of the bashing of female actresses by online critics. This was the furthest thing from a mean-spirited joke. It seems, instead, to be criticizing the mean-spiritedness. 75% of the comments on this site are incredibly mean-spirited, though.

The Onion has always been great and continues to be great.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nope. The real mistake was thinking using a 9 year old CHILD was an appropriate subject for their “satire” attempt.<br />
She’s a CHILD. What part of that is so hard to understand?<br />
MikeknaJ on February 26, 2013 at 8:39 PM
</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry, but the joke wouldn&#8217;t have worked as well had they not referred to the young actress. Yes, the effect was jolting, and it may have been using absurdity to highlight the indefensible, out-of-control nature of much of the bashing of female actresses by online critics. This was the furthest thing from a mean-spirited joke. It seems, instead, to be criticizing the mean-spiritedness. 75% of the comments on this site are incredibly mean-spirited, though.</p>
<p>The Onion has always been great and continues to be great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clearbluesky</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282407</link>
		<dc:creator>clearbluesky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eh, they were right to apologize, but they way they apologized was wrong. They said no one should be the butt of that joke when they should have just said a child shouldn&#039;t be the butt of that joke, i doubt anyone would care if an adult was on the receiving end of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, they were right to apologize, but they way they apologized was wrong. They said no one should be the butt of that joke when they should have just said a child shouldn&#8217;t be the butt of that joke, i doubt anyone would care if an adult was on the receiving end of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rogerb</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282406</link>
		<dc:creator>rogerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Then there is The Onion’s now-infamous Twitter “joke” on Oscar night, in which a nameless writer called the nine-year-old actress &lt;strong&gt;Quvenzhané Wallis&lt;/strong&gt; the C word
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&#160;
Weird. That doesn&#039;t sound like an (R) name at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Then there is The Onion’s now-infamous Twitter “joke” on Oscar night, in which a nameless writer called the nine-year-old actress <strong>Quvenzhané Wallis</strong> the C word
</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
Weird. That doesn&#8217;t sound like an (R) name at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispian</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/26/the-onion-was-wrong-but-it-shouldnt-have-apologized/comment-page-1/#comment-2282403</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=244711#comment-2282403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real real mistake was thinking calling the child that name constituted satire.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real real mistake was thinking calling the child that name constituted satire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>