America’s fiscal future hinges on public reaction to the sequester
It is perhaps more likely that the fate of the sequester cuts—for which most Republicans and Democrats have expressed disdain—may be tied to the upcoming fight over increasing the nation’s ability to continue borrowing, and perhaps a larger “grand bargain” to address the nation’s debt. A measure approved in January put off a debt-ceiling decision until May 19, and some Republicans have said they are willing to consider allowing the nation to default unless deeper budget cuts are enacted. The Treasury will be able to keep meeting the nation’s spending obligations through at least the end of July, analysts say.
Against this backdrop, both parties will be gauging the public reaction to the sequester cuts set to begin on Friday. Groups on all sides of the debate plan to highlight the effects of the cuts once they are officially in place, in an effort to sway public opinion. Obama and Democrats may be evaluating the reaction with an eye on whether a significant public outcry might work to their benefit as they press to replace some cuts with revenue from sources such as levying higher taxes on millionaires, reducing farm subsidies, and closing tax loopholes for oil and gas companies.
If the sequester is met with a shrug, Republicans could use a lack of significant public anger to press Obama and Democrats for still more concessions on the spending they see as a driver of the federal debt. Whichever way it goes, the sequester is set to start soon, and the public’s reaction to the cuts will likely set the stage for what lies ahead.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
State Media will be in full freakout mode even if there is little impact in reality. It’s going to be unbearable.
forest on February 26, 2013 at 10:10 AM
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57329146-503544/obama-pledges-to-veto-effort-to-undo-automatic-spending-cuts/
The link above is of President Obama talking about how he will VETO any effort to stop the Scare-quester. Of course this was November 2011
MoreLiberty on February 26, 2013 at 10:12 AM
Cats and dogs…living together!
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, don’t stop the flow of Obama dollas!
Pay yo damnn taxes!
trs on February 26, 2013 at 10:12 AM
The cuts will have a marginal impact but you can guarantee that all the network media will scour the country looking for each and every individual that died, got laid off, or missed a flight in a nightly segment called “how the republicans ruined the country with their sequester”
Bensonofben on February 26, 2013 at 10:28 AM
America’s fiscal future hinges on public reaction to the sequester
And here I thought it hinged on monitoring Kim K’s baby bump.
ToddPA on February 26, 2013 at 10:49 AM
Although it’s unlikely, it’s possible that we could finally get an “emperor has no clothes” moment.
My guess is that the only people put out are some useless bureaucrats in the DC area. And my response to them would be “Tough.”
BuckeyeSam on February 26, 2013 at 11:22 AM
Start Now. Blame Obama for choosing the Painful cuts first, and being too lazy to look for the waste, duplication and excessive growth in programs since he took office.
Fleuries on February 26, 2013 at 11:52 AM