Karl Rove’s war on conservatives: A career-ender or a career-saver?
Rove’s donors were no exception to this trend, meaning he needed to do something to unruffle their feathers. Fast. “This is all about the donors,” says another veteran strategist. And what better way to make a statement to donors than to formulate a brand-new strategy and splash it across the front page of the paper of record? Message: lessons learned. Course correction set. “This is a follow-the-shiny-ball strategy,” the strategist argues. “It’s smart to get donors focused on the future, focused on a new mission right away as opposed to waiting.”
As for the backlash among purists, some political watchers assume this too is all part of the larger plan. How better to reassure anxious donors that their distaste for Akin-like candidates is shared than to poke a stick in the eye of the party’s anti-establishment forces—and, for good measure, to do so in the newspaper that symbolizes all that hard-core conservatives despise? Rove isn’t an idiot, Republicans point out. He may have simply calculated that it was worth the short-term beating in order to show his donors some love, and thus live to fight another day.
Most establishment Republicans seem confident that this skirmish will peter out soon enough. “While the rhetoric may be heated right now, it will calm down,” insists Georgette Mosbacher, a finance co-chair of the Republican National Committee. The anti-establishment folks, of course, vehemently disagree. “The genie is out of the bottle,” says Deace. “This thing will run its course. One side will win, and one side will lose.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Of course it’s a shiny ball strategy. Part of the reason Rove is doing this is so people don’t stop and think about how badly he failed last election. Plus there are plenty of suckers who will rush to defend him as he is going after the hated and despised conservative base.
I think if he flames out like this again, though, he won’t be able to recover. He’s likely on thin ice as it is.
Doomberg on February 25, 2013 at 5:43 PM
One would hope it’s a career ender.
totherightofthem on February 25, 2013 at 5:47 PM
The Daily Beast is just trying to fan in-fighting flames. Typical.
MikeknaJ on February 25, 2013 at 5:49 PM
Perhaps reminding those donors that Sarah Steelman was the Conservative’s (and Tea Party) choice and Aikin was the Crossover Vote selection would be helpful.
And perhaps a Reminder that people are not looking for Purity but in fact they are looking for Loyalty.
That’s what made Chris Christie so popular – his tendency to speak truth to Media rather than Cow Tow at the first opportunity.
jaydee_007 on February 25, 2013 at 5:51 PM
Yes, he is.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair on February 25, 2013 at 5:52 PM
Karl Rove’s war on conservatives: A career
-ender or a career-saver?MetaThought on February 25, 2013 at 5:54 PM
Yep
crrr6 on February 25, 2013 at 5:55 PM
No, look at the John McCain.
Oil Can on February 25, 2013 at 5:56 PM
Karl Rove got lucky in the 2000 and 2004 elections, barely scraping by. Nothing but dumb luck.
The 2002 midterms were a fluke (post-9/11 GOP bump), and GOP success had little to nothing to do with Rove.
The 2006 and 2008 elections completely decimated the GOP, in large part due to NCLB, failure to push back about the Iraq War, Abramoff, Foley, etc. Rove’s fingerprints were all over the place.
2012 may have been Rove’s biggest failure of all.
Rove had next to nothing to do with GOP success in 2010.
His career IS over. He just doesn’t know it yet.
steebo77 on February 25, 2013 at 5:57 PM
Can’t deny it. He can bring in the big bucks, getting results is a different and irrelevant matter when the former is the goal.
lester on February 25, 2013 at 5:58 PM
We have had long too long the ‘we know better than you who you need and want’ to vote for! How about you slug slime r’s let us decide ‘who we want and need’?
rove you and those like you are what we NOW have in dc.
Guess what rove, WE got Cruz here in TX without your help! We MADE our decision WHO we wanted!
L
letget on February 25, 2013 at 6:10 PM
bestiality
Speakup on February 25, 2013 at 6:10 PM
He never really had a career – never did anything – can’t really say that something is “over” if it never started to begin with.
HondaV65 on February 25, 2013 at 6:19 PM
Stuff the GOPe and the uninformed voters that believe their propaganda.
If any republican is happy with the last election cycle they need to have their heads examined, and those who are not at all happy might want to consider FINALLY getting involved at the grass roots level.
“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors”. Plato
Thus when Americans remain too lethargic to get involved with groups like the TEA Party Patriots they end up with another lousy government that immediately increases their taxes so as to say Thank You!
Get involved or stop whining. You get what you’ve earned.
DannoJyd on February 25, 2013 at 6:24 PM
Most establishment Republicans seem confident that this skirmish will peter out soon enough. “While the rhetoric may be heated right now, it will calm down,” insists Georgette Mosbacher, a finance co-chair of the Republican National Committee.
Let’s see… Republicans decimated in 2006 and 2008. With massive Conservative TEA Party support the Republicans had a truly great election in 2010. Then the Republicans had the great idea of running a liberal Massachusetts Governor for President and four million Republicans didn’t show up and once again the Republicans were decimated.
One might think that the Republicans in addition to being useless were incapable of learning.
RJL on February 25, 2013 at 6:33 PM
You would think that Roves continual losses since 2004 would be enough of the career killer. I don’t think he’s the architect anymore.
Cindy Munford on February 25, 2013 at 6:54 PM
“
Guess we’ll find out which group is right come the next major election. Will the anti-establishment types fall for the “we need to unite to beat the Dems, support the guy who can win” song and dance we bought the last time
katiejane on February 25, 2013 at 7:08 PM
Don’t think this is going to work out the way the repubs hope. Never voting for another establishment gop lord.
Panther on February 25, 2013 at 7:39 PM
Hopefully, Porky Pig will remain the GOPe’s one and only front man. They are finished with him out front.
james23 on February 25, 2013 at 8:21 PM
Not this anti-establishment type. It’s pretty clear that voting Republican doesn’t beat the Dems if the elected Republicans aren’t really all that opposed to the elected Democrats anyway.
Aitch748 on February 25, 2013 at 8:56 PM