Will robots replace doctors?
So how would all these innovations fit together? How would the health-care system be different—and how, from a patient’s standpoint, would it feel different—from the one we have today? Imagine you’re an adult with a chronic condition like high blood pressure. Today, your contact with the health-care system would be largely episodic: You’d have regular checkups, at which a doctor or maybe a nurse-practitioner would check your blood pressure and ask about recent behavior—diet, exercise, and whatnot. Maybe you’d give an accurate account, maybe you wouldn’t. If you started experiencing pain or had some other sign of trouble, you’d make an appointment and come in—but by then, the symptom might well have subsided, making it hard to figure out what was going on.
In the future as the innovators imagine it—“Health 2.0,” as some people have started calling it—you would be in constant contact with the health-care system, although you’d hardly be aware of it. The goal would be to keep you healthy—and any time you were in danger of becoming unhealthy, to ensure you received attention right away. You might wear a bracelet that monitors your blood pressure, or a pedometer that logs movement and exercise. You could opt for a monitoring system that makes sure you take your prescribed medication, at the prescribed intervals. All of these devices would transmit information back to your provider of basic medical care, dumping data directly into an electronic medical record.
And the provider wouldn’t be one doctor, but rather a team of professionals, available at all hours and heavily armed with technology to guide and assist them as they made decisions. If, say, your blood pressure suddenly spiked, data-processing tools would warn them that you might be in trouble, and some sort of clinician—a nurse, perhaps—would reach out to you immediately, to check on your condition and arrange treatment as necessary. You could reach the team just as easily, with something as simple as a text message or an e-mail. You’d be in touch with them more frequently, most likely, but for much shorter durations—and, for the most part, with less urgency.
Sometimes, of course, office or hospital visits would be necessary, but that experience would be different, too—starting with the hassle of dealing with insurance companies. Watson has a button for submitting treatment proposals to managed-care companies, for near-instant approval, reducing the time and hassle involved in gaining payment authorization.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Well, at least the robot won’t crack a stupid joke as he rams his finger up my butthole. Unless the robot is specifically programmed to do this, of course.
radjah shelduck on February 23, 2013 at 8:34 PM
This is just a dystopian sci-fi story, right? Because if it were real, it would be terrifying.
“You will take your prescribed medication, at the prescribed intervals. It is for your own good, and the good of the state!”
ZenDraken on February 23, 2013 at 9:05 PM
And their patients too. I for one welcome our robot overlords, #362,285.
rbj on February 23, 2013 at 9:07 PM
Replace? Not with the Unaffordable Care Act. Supplement is more like it.
platypus on February 23, 2013 at 9:58 PM
And all they’re waiting for is a little more Gun Control…
Browncoatone on February 23, 2013 at 10:04 PM
As with most things, it isn’t so much “replace” as it is “make more productive”. There is always going to be a doctor in the loop somehow.
Count to 10 on February 23, 2013 at 11:03 PM
Of course healthcare delivery will soon be automated. First, “just because they can”, and secondly, because they can’t afford not to. The development of “Physician Extenders” (think “Hamburger Helper”) is not a new effort. As Medical payments diminish (and as the potential for autonomous action disappears), the bright and well-educated will migrate to other professions, and the base of health-delivery will be swollen by poorly-trained immigrants with third-world medical degrees, willing to work for a pittance. (Look at the current composition of the National Health Service in Britain for confirmation.)
“Doctoring” is currently being distilled into nothing more than an expert system (“evidence-based medicine”), and once fully codified, there is no need (and no room) for human flexibility and judgement. In fact, those can produce results of diagnoses and treatments that would be (potentially expensive) outliers, whose purveyors would be discouraged and punished if necessary.
Medicine was thought of as “arts and sciences”, but this will eradicate the artistic component. Welcome to the brave new world, citizen. Of course, there will always be individualized healthcare for the elites, and for former congressional members and their families. Plus, someone has to maintain and update the logic for the expert systems. But that will all be through ivory-castle academics, insulated from the suffocating drabness that will be mass health care for you and I.
bofh on February 24, 2013 at 9:05 AM