Why wasn’t there a Chinese Spring?
But, of course, the Chinese regime has not collapsed and does not seem to be in its death throes. This is puzzling in some respects, because the country experiences annual protests that reportedly topped 180,000 as recently as 2010. Clearly popular discontent is high and Chinese citizens participate in contentious politics in large numbers, but these remain mostly localized affairs targeted at local issues, such as corrupt, low-ranking officials who engage in land grabs. Aside from the June 4 incident of 1989, they have not transformed into protest movements coordinated on a national scale and positioned against the central government itself, as appeared rapidly in Tunis and Egypt’s Tahrir square.
So why have Chinese citizens trended towards localized protests rather than the national protest movements seen in the Arab spring? As discussed in an important body of research, one source of this difference is linked to the structure of the state itself. In China, unlike most autocracies – including Mubarak’s Egypt and Ben Ali’s Tunisia—the state is highly decentralized. Local governments are given a substantial level of autonomy over development policies as well as social management – decisions related to dealing with popular challengers through repression or alternatively, the extension of concessions.
Since local authorities make decisions over the carrots and sticks used to address the demands of citizens with a high degree of autonomy, these officials rather than the national leadership or the regime itself are the primary target of most protest actions. In fact, it is a common phenomenon in China that aggrieved locals will appeal to the Center for assistance against corrupt local officials, even making reference to local officials’ poor enforcement of central directives and policies.Thus, the struggles faced by everyday Chinese are often directed at particular local officials and local issues, limiting the desire of protestors to take the dangerous leap of coordinating their actions across local communities to challenge the regime itself.








Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Arabs are stupid tyrants and religious zombies following a Hell-inspired moongod with a pedophiliac madman as his prophet.
Communists are tyrants.
There’s why.
MelonCollie on February 23, 2013 at 3:35 PM
Experienced tyrants.
Count to 10 on February 23, 2013 at 3:38 PM
There was. Remember Tianamin Square? We helped there just as much as we helped the Iranian Spring.
RoadRunner on February 23, 2013 at 3:42 PM
Tiananmen Square
sharrukin on February 23, 2013 at 3:42 PM
I’d say the Chinese are for more adept at virtually everything, including tyranny.
trigon on February 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM
From what I gather, I don’t think their current brand of communism is anything as bad as what it was once. Plus they seem to act very differently than Westerners do.
IT seems they are on Communist Light & it’s been serving them well enough.
I guess if they like it, that’s their business.
Badger40 on February 23, 2013 at 3:48 PM
Because the Arabs have relatively easy access to guns and other weapons. The Chinese do not.
The Rogue Tomato on February 23, 2013 at 3:54 PM
Why in the hell would the Chinese people themselves want multi-party representative Democracy?
Americans, especially Americans on the Right, should know that any nation which adopts multi-party representative democracy will be hijacked against it’s own people.
China is more “democratic” as a spiritual expression of it’s Demos than any nation in the West.
ninjapirate on February 23, 2013 at 3:54 PM
Because Krugman, Obama and DarkCurrent love the winter over there, and in the US.
Schadenfreude on February 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM
Despite the conservative assertion that socialism in unworkable, the Soviet Union endured for over 70 years.
It takes courage to change – even, as many Chinese and Russians found out throughout the 20th Century, when the alternative to risking death is death.
HitNRun on February 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM
Exactly. Arab tyranny boils down to “bunch of bullies with guns (or swords in years gone by) led by a priests of said fruitcake religion and/or some mouth-breathing strongman.” They have no real analog to the KGB, just glorified schoolyard bullies whose ‘tattling’ is lethal.
The Chinese may not have a world-spanning religious system but they run a way tighter ship.
That’s not even the half of it! Arabs don’t even bother stealing anything from Westerners that isn’t a gun/bomb, materials for same, or for counterfeiting their money. They literally have no use or interest for something as simple as making knockoff video games. Only implements of death.
Even the ChiComs aren’t THAT one-track-minded, and they occasionally manage to come up with something on their own. And compare their economic rise to that of Terrorland. The latter had nothing and never would have had anything, but for their economic lottery win of “By Allah! That stinky black stuff is worth a fortune to the infidels!”
MelonCollie on February 23, 2013 at 3:56 PM
The American Right needs to get over their ChiCom(and Putin) hatred…
The ChiComs delude themselves by pretending their Communists… The United States(and the American Right)_ deule themselves by pretending they are not Communists.
unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2012/01/kiss-stalin-was-feeling-extremely-gay.html
ninjapirate on February 23, 2013 at 3:59 PM
The Chinese youth are nationalist, they actually love their country. They aren’t too keen on their government at times but don’t confuse a nationalist with a party lackey.
The Chinese population as a whole has seen an increase in disposable income and standard of living. You don’t riot under those conditions.
Oh, and it was thanks to capitalism. Think they call it a “socialist market economy under Chinese conditions.” Whatever, it is free-economic zones enacted under Deng Xiaoping.
Panther on February 23, 2013 at 4:02 PM
Last thing we need is the Salafists running China.
forest on February 23, 2013 at 4:40 PM
In some ways, the Chinese market is much more free. If you want to start a business, you just roll up the garage door and start selling stuff. As long as you grease a few palms now and then, you’ll be fine. It depends on where you are.
Here, your kids can’t even sell lemonade without a permit.
The Rogue Tomato on February 23, 2013 at 5:02 PM
This is another good point. I seem to recall reading that they have the fastest advancing standard of living in the world right now.
The Rogue Tomato on February 23, 2013 at 5:32 PM