White House now selling access to rich contributors in order to fund OFA
At least half of the group’s budget will come from a select group of donors who will each contribute or raise $500,000 or more, according to donors and strategists involved in the effort.
Unlike a presidential campaign, Organizing for Action has been set up as a tax-exempt “social welfare group.” That means it is not bound by federal contribution limits, laws that bar White House officials from soliciting contributions, or the stringent reporting requirements for campaigns. In their place, the new group will self-regulate…
“There are wins we can have on guns and immigration,” Jon Carson, the group’s new executive director, told prospective donors on a conference call on Wednesday, according to people who participated. “We have to change the conventional wisdom on those issues.”
But those contributions will also translate into access, according to donors courted by the president’s aides. Next month, Organizing for Action will hold a “founders summit” at a hotel near the White House, where donors paying $50,000 each will mingle with Mr. Obama’s former campaign manager, Jim Messina, and Mr. Carson, who previously led the White House Office of Public Engagement.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
And it’s worth every dime. There’s only room for 1% of the population in the Numenklatura, and it you’re not inside, your fortunes will be going downhill, if they aren’t already.
forest on February 23, 2013 at 12:48 PM
SSDD. What they accuse us of they do without guilt.
Jeff Weimer on February 23, 2013 at 12:48 PM
Maybe this is a front for Moochelle’s coronation as Pres in 16?
Dingbat63 on February 23, 2013 at 1:08 PM
Wouldn’t OFAY be a more appropriate name?
LegendHasIt on February 23, 2013 at 1:17 PM
$50,000 to mingle with Jim Messina? Ewwww!
Trafalgar on February 23, 2013 at 1:30 PM
O bama
F lukes
A merica
Schadenfreude on February 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM
How is this legal?
Meryl Yourish on February 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM
Serious question: what ‘access’ is being sold to donors when access is already guaranteed via the First Amendment’s Right to Petition (RTP) Clause? How does a donor’s better access to government not violate a non-donor’s RTP access, given the reality of limited government accessibility?
PersonFromPorlock on February 23, 2013 at 2:36 PM
Has he started renting out the Lincoln bedroom, a la Clinton?
RoadRunner on February 23, 2013 at 3:47 PM
a review of the comments to the article indicates that the libtards that treat the NY Times as gospel think that money in politics is only a republican thing. I commented that unions spent in excess of 4 billion dollars on political contributions between 200502011 and they didn’t publish it. I guess it didn’t fit with their propaganda.
Mr. Curly on February 23, 2013 at 7:46 PM