Do Republicans really want lower spending or not?
Republicans, especially Defense Department stalwarts, have spent 19 months doomsaying the reductions. The cuts have been described in apocalyptic terms over and over and over again. “Harsh.” “Brutal.” “Devastating.”…
So here sit Republicans, teeth clenched, gripping their desks, waiting for the “devastating” cuts to explode the economy and just hoping that Obama will get some of the blame for having invented the thing. They are assuming that $85 billion less spent by the government will cause devastation in an economy of some $16 trillion. What a bunch of Keynesians.
If the cuts are so bad, why not just stop them? Quit the puffery about offsets versus tax hikes and just kill the monster they helped make. The Senate would surely go along and the president would only too happily sign.
As it is, Republicans and Obama look like two firemen standing outside of a burning building arguing about whether to use water from the hydrant or the truck to put it out. “Wait until you see my press release blaming you!” screams one. “Oh yeah, well I’m going to hit you with the snarkiest Tweets ever!” screams the other.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
It’s all just silly theater by now.
Burn it all down.
SirGawain on February 22, 2013 at 1:28 PM
Nope.
Next.
Washington Nearsider on February 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM
Because it’s definitely us whining over the sequestration.
Oh, and Chris: you tie the ENGINE (trucks are more geared towards search and rescue) into the hydrant to put the fire out. The truck is nothing without water from the hydrant, and the hydrant needs the pump and nozzles on the engine. Might want to work on your metaphors.
Atlas on February 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM
I submit that most Republicans really do want spending cuts, but that almost none of them have the political will to make it happen and therefore won’t really do anything to make it happen. This lack of spine and constant bowing over for the Democrats is why the Tea Party movement started. TPers got exercised almost as much in response to the failure of Republicans as it did to the anti-Americanism of Democrats.
Warner Todd Huston on February 22, 2013 at 1:31 PM
Is this a trick question? Of course they don’t. That’s why they always cave during budget deals.
RoadRunner on February 22, 2013 at 1:31 PM
Republicans? Democrats? What’s the difference? I mean, is there any MEANINGFUL difference between Karl Rove and David Axlerod?
No, not really. Both work to elect big spenders with no regard to our Constitution.
wildcat72 on February 22, 2013 at 1:34 PM
..it’s all D. C. Kabuki, pal. Always has been.
The War Planner on February 22, 2013 at 1:35 PM
Republicans don’t; conservatives do. We have to cut something besides the military though.
Doomberg on February 22, 2013 at 1:36 PM
The real question is: Do
RepublicansAmericans really want lower spending or not?Results from last election: nope – full speed ahead to bankruptcy!
Rebar on February 22, 2013 at 1:37 PM
No.
A tiny fraction of them do, but as a group…no.
sharrukin on February 22, 2013 at 1:39 PM
Most republicans in congress are just closet democrats – they want big government.
albill on February 22, 2013 at 1:40 PM
Well, we know for sure that the GOP’s pre-selected 2016 nominee, Marco Rubio, doesn’t. Or does he have some sort of trick up his sleeve to cover welfare and obamacare costs for the 11 million plus illegals to whom he is desperate to grant obamAmnesty?
Is lower spending part of Rubio’s DREAM?
Pork-Chop on February 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM
Not the ones in Washington. They’ve been to too many cocktail parties.
CurtZHP on February 22, 2013 at 1:45 PM
No. Next question?
Shump on February 22, 2013 at 1:53 PM
No, they don’t. Why? Because many of them have gotten friends and relatives government jobs. They are just as bad as the Democrats.
How many millions of people have lost jobs in the past 5 years? Why the heck should government workers jobs be sacrosanct?
Rocks on February 22, 2013 at 2:07 PM
The Rs are just a different type of azzholes.
Both parties scroom the producers/taxpayers, royally.
‘Pitchfork’ most all in DC by sending them home.
First, look in the mirror. If you are a mooching harlot on the dole, suffocate in shame, unless you are incapable phisically/mentally to help yourself.
Otherwise you are part of the problem. In that case, go to Hell.
Schadenfreude on February 22, 2013 at 2:54 PM
physically
Schadenfreude on February 22, 2013 at 2:54 PM
Let’s just change the name of our country to Titanic.
Ward Cleaver on February 22, 2013 at 3:11 PM
I dunno, but this conservative wants $1,950,000,000,000 less spending every year, just as a start.
astonerii on February 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM
NOT
BoxHead1 on February 22, 2013 at 4:04 PM