Rand Paul’s interesting advantage
But I digress. Back to Rand Paul. He’s obviously moderating his image — successfully. He seems reasonable, calm and thoughtful. But he leaves room for the suspicion that there’s a more aggressive agenda behind the facade. But that agenda is less scary. Whereas the typical Republican often talks in a way that fuels (unwarranted) fears of theocracy and the Handmaid’s Tale, there’s something about the way Rand Paul talks that fuels the suspicion he’d actually be much more libertarian than he lets on. Of course, that suspicion is one reason why conservative hawks distrust him so much and leftwing doves give him so much of a pass. But when it comes to domestic policy, he gives the impression that if he actually got his hands on the levers of power he’d just leave us alone.
Because his rise fuels a narrative the media loves — civil war on the right — Paul’s libertarianism will be treated as charming and harmless for a while more. The fact that the left likes his foreign policy dovishness and the “neocons” don’t also makes him a useful foil for some liberals. But you can be sure that if he got real power and influence within the party or if he were the actual GOP nominee, his charming libertarianism would instantaneously terrify a lot of people. But for now, it all works for him.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I thought you said that the agenda was less scary.
Stoic Patriot on February 20, 2013 at 4:23 PM
Blue Buddha!!!
Bmore on February 20, 2013 at 4:26 PM
No… Aqua Buddha
dforston on February 20, 2013 at 4:30 PM
There’s nothing interesting about Rand Paul. *rolleyes*
BigGator5 on February 20, 2013 at 4:33 PM
I hope so. The current agenda isn’t working out, Jonah. Your team is, sadly, greatly responsible for the unraveling of our fragile republic.
Better him than the neoconservatives or the Moaning Joe crowd. Not too many of us want to live in the United States of Detroit.
Punchenko on February 20, 2013 at 4:41 PM
So sayeth the wingnut sorehead who’s never even been elected mayor.
Well that is just !@#$ fine with me, bucko!!! A lot of people NEED some terrifying.
MelonCollie on February 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM
Why are you scared of liberty?
FloatingRock on February 20, 2013 at 4:52 PM
Rand is awesome. Anyone on these boards that disagrees is a moby or social con.
ramesees on February 20, 2013 at 4:53 PM
Probably because the Rand Paul variety’s going to include a surge in drugged-out idiots and illegal immigrants.
Stoic Patriot on February 20, 2013 at 4:54 PM
.
First the build up, then the Pollyannaish, hair-on-fire, we are all going to die in the streets, headlines, and stories about how Paul will be the death of everything, even cockroaches if elected.
Like McCain was treated so long as he was attacking fellow Republicans.
Then he ran for President.
LincolntheHun on February 20, 2013 at 4:55 PM
@stoic
ah the old “potheads are libertarians” scare tactic. Please. I’d rather have potheads running around then all the alcoholics we have now
johnnyboy on February 20, 2013 at 4:58 PM
I’d rather have neither, but I’ll take the status quo over someone who wants to worsen the situation.
Stoic Patriot on February 20, 2013 at 5:05 PM
The status quo under Obama can only get worse. Neither he nor his followers are physically or mentally capable of fixing anything, and his handlers don’t want to.
MelonCollie on February 20, 2013 at 5:10 PM
True. And Obama’s doing absolutely nothing when it comes to drug enforcement. One way or another, though, he’ll be gone in 2016, which is when I hope to see a stark improvement end up in the Oval Office.
Stoic Patriot on February 20, 2013 at 5:16 PM
Snappy Response
BigGator5 on February 20, 2013 at 5:21 PM
I fail to see how.
theperfecteconomist on February 20, 2013 at 5:25 PM
There is the (unfortunately not-unfounded) belief that an actual libertarian in power might lead to legalized pot, as well as pulling out of our various useless overseas interventions before the fiscal cliff hits.
Obama made a promise for it but hey, you know him and promises. It took him this long to pull out of Afcrapistan when he could’ve done it the day he was elected to another wave of public approval.
MelonCollie on February 20, 2013 at 6:04 PM
Umm I like Rand Paul and I happen to consider myself a social con. Why do you consider these things mutually exclusive?
melle1228 on February 20, 2013 at 6:09 PM
I heard Ms Rubin on Bill Bennett’s show yesterday. She was quite condescending in her tepid approval of Sen. Paul. If he’s not her “cup of tea” that only makes me like him more.
Cindy Munford on February 20, 2013 at 6:24 PM