How robots are eating the last of America’s—and the world’s—traditional manufacturing jobs
“There may not be a place for humans in the future, if we’re really successful,” Brooks told filmmaker Errol Morris back when he was just a roboticist at MIT. Since then, Brooks has given up his tenured academic job, founded and then stepped away from iRobot, maker of the Roomba automatic vacuum cleaner, and now is at Rethink Robotics.
Most industrial robots are large, expensive (costing $100,000 or more), and so hazardous to humans that they must be kept separate from people by plexiglass cages. They are also expensive to maintain and difficult to direct. Over its lifetime, the care and programming of an industrial robot can easily cost its owner two or three times its initial price tag.
But Baxter, as I discovered at that party at MIT, is ridiculously easy to program. Like information technology before it, robots won’t become ubiquitous until they’re easy to use, says Brooks, and that’s what’s so innovative about the products of Rethink Robotics. “In general, if you look at the factory floor, ease of use of equipment has not been a focus of attention,” says Brooks. “But it has been in the IT industry, and we’d not be where we are if laptops weren’t easy to use. An ordinary factory worker can train Baxter to do a task in just minutes.”
In factories, managers typically will not invest in any automation that requires more than two years to pay for itself, when compared to some other solution, like paying a human to do it. But thanks to some very clever engineering, Baxter only costs $22,000. In the US, a person working full time at minimum wage makes only $15,080 a year.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Yeah, it will be all fun and games until they learn to go on strike!
OldEnglish on February 20, 2013 at 6:58 PM
I’m married. I am a robot so I’ve nothing to fear.
Limerick on February 20, 2013 at 7:05 PM
And those ATM kiosks. Don’t forget those.
John the Libertarian on February 20, 2013 at 7:25 PM
The “last of the manufacturing jobs” are going to be engineering and maintenance jobs, because that is what is most productive.
Count to 10 on February 20, 2013 at 7:28 PM
No fear. The people who used to work there have a hundred other places to go find employment under the benevolent reign of King Obama the First.
MelonCollie on February 20, 2013 at 7:31 PM
Well, why not be proactive and buy your own baxter and have him do your job for you. He can increase your productivity and get you promoted! But seriously, if these kinds of things become cheap enough and capable enough, they can tend your house, cook your food, grow your garden, and create items for you to trade for other items.
Companies cannot simply churn out trillions of dollars worth of merchandise when there are are not enough people earning to buy that merchandise. Who is going to be the customer? Baxter?
astonerii on February 20, 2013 at 7:39 PM
But they still can’t make a good cup of cappuccino, so there’s always that.
Socratease on February 20, 2013 at 7:42 PM
LOL
“the last”?
There are still hundreds of millions of manufacturing jobs around the world.
Sure, most of them pay less than $5 a day, but they’re still there.
itsnotaboutme on February 20, 2013 at 7:45 PM
Once they perfect 3D printing, all manufacturing jobs will cease.
John the Libertarian on February 20, 2013 at 7:57 PM
Watching the how its made shows has shown me how incredibly labor-intensive making just about everything really is.
We will be fine. Until fully human-like machines that can perform any manual labor task is made, that is.
Neo on February 20, 2013 at 8:23 PM
Those pining for traditional manufacturing jobs are welcome to learn to be happy only with things not made efficiently and accurately with robots, or to pay for those things at what it would cost to have them made in the traditional way.
Yeah, I didn’t think so.
Do you suppose there was this much hand-wringing when water wheels went out?
TexasDan on February 20, 2013 at 9:02 PM
Waterwheels are a power source, genius, not purpose-built labor automation.
MelonCollie on February 20, 2013 at 10:42 PM
Much ado about nothing. Robots can be a big help in manufacturing, but they can’t continuously improve processes. This is why Toyota hasn’t replaced every last line worker with a robot.
I see robots on hand to assist front line workers with heir tasks and automate certain processes. Right now, only the very large corporations generally have robots. I know a lot of good mid-sized companies that can’t afford them. Heck, even John Deere just added their first robot painters at their Waterloo assembly plant. The whole shebang cost over 30 million.
I would love to see something like Baxter take off as I could use a few to supplement what I do. However, we’re just not there yet. And there is a manufacturing labor shortage by the way….
Free Indeed on February 20, 2013 at 10:44 PM
3D printing isn’t going to kill manufacturing either, but I am really excited about it.
Free Indeed on February 20, 2013 at 10:44 PM