Pope Benedict XVI’s leaked documents show fractured Vatican full of rivalries
VatiLeaks, as the scandal came to be known, dragged the fusty institution into the wild WikiLeaks era. It exposed the church bureaucracy’s entrenched opposition to Benedict’s fledgling effort to carve out a legacy as a reformer against the backdrop of a global child sex abuse scandal and the continued dwindling of his flock.
It showed how Benedict, a weak manager who may most be remembered for the way in which he left office, was no match for a culture that rejected even a modicum of transparency and preferred a damage-control campaign that diverted attention from the institution’s fundamental problems. Interviews in Rome with dozens of church officials, Vatican insiders and foreign government officials close to the church, many of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution, mapped out that hermetic universe.
“We can reveal the face of the church and how this face is, at times, disfigured,” Benedict said in his final homily on Ash Wednesday. “I am thinking in particular of the sins against the unity of the church, of the divisions in the body of the church.” He called for his ministry to overcome “individualism” and “rivalry,” saying they were only for those “who have distanced themselves from the faith.”
A radical transformation of the culture is unlikely. “We’re talking about people who have given their life to this institution, but at the same time the institution has become their life,” said one senior Vatican official. “Unlike parish priests, who have the personal rewards that come with everyday contact, their lot is not as human. It’s bureaucratic, but it becomes all-consuming.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
…and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.
gryphon202 on February 17, 2013 at 4:48 PM
So basically it’s like every other major organization in existence?
Hell, my family of six is this way (in between periodic spurts of relative harmony). It’s human nature.
Somehow I think the world will keep turning and the Church will keep fighting the good fight.
Atlas on February 17, 2013 at 4:49 PM
More of the media going out of their way to discredit Benedict XVI as “weak,” “failed,” “doomed,” and such. Clear sign he’s done something right.
Gingotts on February 17, 2013 at 4:51 PM
I’m shocked – an institution as old as the RCC and there are rivalries and intrigue. How ever has it lasted this long? /s
katiejane on February 17, 2013 at 5:00 PM
Exactly.
Capitalist Hog on February 17, 2013 at 5:29 PM
Aside from the rampant sexual-abuse, lies and cover-up. Oh yeah, moral authority.
Just like everybody else.
Capitalist Hog on February 17, 2013 at 5:33 PM
So I’m supposed to trust a thirdhand recounting of a secondhand transmission of documents, lacking critical context, and passing through the hands of parties hostile to the RCC? But all that aside, and operating on the assumption that this characterization is true, the Body of Christ is made up of sinners, which even includes those who hold authority with in the Church. Of course, in comparison to Popes the RCC has endured in the past, none of this even rises to the level of a mild scandal.
David Marcoe on February 17, 2013 at 5:37 PM
Hey, at least the Church has standards to measure it’s action against, unlike the fusty WaPo, which has shown itself to have practically none at all.
I wonder what a WaPoLeaks would find?
Dusty on February 17, 2013 at 5:43 PM
I would note that that was a scandal that occurred primarily in the United States, and with in certain Archdioceses. That it should be held against all 1.2 billion Catholics is ridiculous, especially when taken alongside similar scandals that have occurred at secular institutions.
And if you’re going to cite the doctrine of Papal infallibility, note that it doesn’t include every word and deed of a Pope, but only when acting in certain capacities, and (according to Catholic teaching) with the assistance of the Holy Spirit. What that means is that the Pope is a fallible human being, who gets some assistance from God. And note that I’m saying all this as a Protestant, who doesn’t agree with the doctrine. Popes themselves are not above criticism in the Catholic world. Dante, in his Divine Comedy, placed several Popes in hell.
David Marcoe on February 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM