<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>HotAir</title><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/16/why-the-word-panties-is-so-awful/feed/</link><description>HotAir is the leading conservative blog for breaking news and commentary covering the Biden administration, politics, media, culture, and current elections.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 06:13:57 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Why the word "panties" is so awful</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Sure, when said within the confines of a lingerie store, by an older saleswoman with a tape measure around her neck and glasses slipping down her nose, it&amp;#8217;s fine: &amp;#8220;Did you see the black underwire has the matching panty?&amp;#8221; But taken out of this context, the word &amp;#8220;panty&amp;#8221; can be grimace-inducing—and there are a few possible reasons for that.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:35:20 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Allahpundit]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://hotair.com/headlines/2013/02/16/why-the-word-panties-is-so-awful-n100199</link></item></channel></rss>