Can Cory Booker take criticism?
The good news for Booker is that just about everyone in the political world will soon forget all of this. And even though it looks like he just bullied an aging man into retirement, few if any rank-and-file voters are paying attention or care. Booker was by far the most popular Democratic politician in New Jersey when he announced his ’14 intentions two months ago, and he still is today. This is his race to lose.
The question, though, is what the last two months say about his preparation for the national stage. For more than a decade, Booker has excelled at attracting fawning, uncritical press coverage, but as a senator with higher ambitions, he’ll face a level of scrutiny he’s unaccustomed to. In his public pursuit of Lautenberg’s seat, Booker has made a series of baffling and self-damaging decisions and, as Maggie Haberman put it, shown “the unmistakable signs of glass jaw syndrome.” Faced with tough media coverage, he’s reacted very defensively, and there’s been some upheaval within his political organization too.
Again, Cory Booker is very likely to be New Jersey’s next senator. But to those who are watching closely, his debut as a candidate has been an unimpressive one – a needlessly unimpressive one.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
How is this guy not a Republican, if Christie is?
Fallon on February 15, 2013 at 8:32 PM
Criticism…?
From who?
Everybody knows that doubting the qualifications of a minority ‘rat is RACIST!
Even if they’re a SCOAMF.
CPT. Charles on February 15, 2013 at 8:54 PM
Not to leap out in Booker’s defense, but Kornacki and Haberman both acknowledge that Jersey politics aren’t for the faint of heart or stomach. So, are we really supposed to think that Booker made a bad decision by big-footing Lautenberg out of the race early? It looks like he did exactly what he needed to do to ensure he got the Democratic nomination. It worked.
Yet Kornacki writes this piece like readers should frown on how Booker ingloriously shoved a five-term, 90 year-old incumbent out of the race with ease… Its Jersey. There’s no crying in baseball.
Lawdawg86 on February 15, 2013 at 9:06 PM
I always thought Lautenberg to be sort of a place holder after the Torricelli fiasco, and would leave as soon as the “real” senator was elected. That was over a decade ago, though, and now he’s almost 90 years old.
Booker has done Jersey a favor.
kakypat on February 15, 2013 at 9:20 PM