Comments on: Report: Dems don’t have 60 votes for Hagel yet

By: onlineanalyst

onlineanalyst — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:19:17 +0000

Reid the Pompous Liar uses his position to outright create his own reality in re to the Hagel nomination.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/340701/gop-filibuster-hagel-nomination-andrew-stiles

Panetta himself said that he would continue to serve until his replacement was sworn in.

Call out the liar Reid, who uses his position in the Senate well to hide.

By: DannoJyd

DannoJyd — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:15:44 +0000

“YET!” That is the keyword since it would seem that the Democrats are AGAIN trying to make it appear they are not goose stepping 0bama syncophants due to the next election cycle coming up, and thir remembering the HISTORIC TEAnami of 2010.

Yes, they think they still can fool the lethargic Americans into believing they actually do represent you.

Suckers!

By: changer1701

changer1701 — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:00:35 +0000

That buffoon shouldn’t have 20 votes, let alone close to 60.

By: Schadenfreude

Schadenfreude — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:48:47 +0000

Maxine Waters will be better.

By: crrr6

crrr6 — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:46:35 +0000

What is the argument again for his confirmation? Demonstrable stupidity and incompetence with a helping of antisemitism?

By: Mimzey

Mimzey — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:43:26 +0000

Yeah right.
Just more theater to build hope, so defeat has a greater effect.

Resistance if futile.
Assimilate.

By: letget

letget — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:41:38 +0000

Don’t cave r’s!
L

By: rcpjr

rcpjr — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:39:29 +0000

That’s nice, but I fully expect the GOP to fold like lawn chairs.

By: Lucano

Lucano — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:29:12 +0000

I’m sure they’ll find one republican to blackmail .
It’s the Chicago way .

By: BuckeyeSam

BuckeyeSam — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:26:11 +0000

Harriet Hagel?