Comments on: Study: Fewer men leads to more babies in poor areas

By: 29Victor

29Victor — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 04:33:11 +0000

When there are less men they are “worth” more just like any other commodity. Therefore women are willing to put out easier to get them and put up with more catting around to keep them. Simple.

Also, less men = less breadwinners = more government checks from having kids as a source of income. When the government subsidizes something you get more of it.

By: arnold ziffel

arnold ziffel — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 03:00:00 +0000

Reproductive careers? What the cr*p is that? Or translation: Those womenz in poor areas are stupidz. Just great. tommy71 on February 13, 2013 at 8:53 PM

roflmao, I read that twice to make sure I comprende'd it.

By: MelonCollie

MelonCollie — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:31:25 +0000

No.

Welfare queens screwing like rabbits = more ghetto babies.

viking01 on February 13, 2013 at 9:13 PM

Dingdingding. We have fewer MEN, but just as many males, and we’re subsidizing Idiocracy-like behavior.

By: viking01

viking01 — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:13:44 +0000

No.

Welfare queens screwing like rabbits = more ghetto babies.

Even more screwball is how “welfare” bureaucracies typically refer to deadbeat dads as “absent parents. They’d certainly wouldn’t want to offend deadbeat dads for increasing potential Obama ~~voters~~ serfs.

By: WisCon

WisCon — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:12:31 +0000

Dads replaced by Uncle Sam.

By: SWalker

SWalker — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 02:09:43 +0000

We are doomed.

Golden Boy on February 13, 2013 at 8:46 PM

True, but keep in mind, being doomed takes a lot of hard work, it’s doesn’t just happen by chance. If you aren’t both careful and diligent, your doomage can easily slip away from you. America has worked both very hard and very diligently for this doomage.

By: tommy71

tommy71 — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:53:01 +0000

Reproductive careers? What the cr*p is that? Or translation: Those womenz in poor areas are stupidz. Just great.

By: Golden Boy

Golden Boy — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:46:35 +0000

“We found that poor women are more likely to rush to start their ‘reproductive careers’, while rich women are more likely to delay having children.”

Further proof the movie “Idiocracy” was a documentary.

We are doomed.

By: rogerb

rogerb — Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:44:29 +0000

Study co-author Abby Chipman said that in poorer neighbourhoods the increase in the birth rate was mainly among 15-to-24-year olds, while in more affluent areas it was among those aged 34 to 39. “If there are more women than men, studies have shown that women have lower expectations of men,” she said.

Lower expectations of the men?