2014 and the Democrats’ long-term gun-control strategy
By themselves, these bills wouldn’t have a huge impact on gun violence, but their passage would validate Obama’s insistence that “this time is different” and prove that the NRA can be beaten. Of course, the passage of the Brady Bill and assault weapons ban back in 1993 and 1994 supposedly proved this too; if you go back and read a newspaper from May ’94, when the ban cleared the House, you’ll find any number of writers declaring the political death of the NRA. But then Democrats were crushed in the ’94 midterms, a backlash from pro-gun voters was cited as a major reason why, and Democrats began their two-decade retreat.
Which is why November 2014 is setting up as a crucial moment in the renewed battle for gun control. There may well be enough momentum for Obama to push through some new laws this year. They won’t be sufficient, but doing so will make gun control a major issue in the ’14 midterms. If those who support the news laws pay a price at the polls, the issue will again recede. But if they survive – and, especially, if those who vote against any of the laws Obama is calling for are defeated – it should create new momentum for further, more far-reaching reforms.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Colbyjack on February 13, 2013 at 3:09 PM
Convincing to whom? The “usual suspects”, especially in the media, who are terribly misinformed and already supported his radical agenda. Repeating “deserves a vote” is not argument nor discussion and barely even rises to the level of slogan. That someone in the media would conflate Obama’s speech with arguing a case/position shows the inherent bias of the reporter.
deepdiver on February 13, 2013 at 3:12 PM
Well this news should see to it that EVEN more guns/ammo will be bought by anyone who wants to keep our 2nd?
bho/d are he!! bent on taking away any means what-so-ever to protect us from ‘king’ bho?
Better get with it people, get yours while you still can!
L
letget on February 13, 2013 at 3:17 PM
For what?
Preventing gun violence or removing our right to a gun?
Not a single law will ever be sufficient in preventing gun violence short of removing every gun from the planet and even then people will still be making wick and flintlock fired black power ones. The gun genie will never go back into the bottle no mater what laws are passed. Mainly because criminals don’t obey laws. It is why they are know as criminals. It is also a simple fact the escapes just about every liberal.
Dr. Frank Enstine on February 13, 2013 at 3:20 PM
Edited for truth.
CurtZHP on February 13, 2013 at 3:21 PM
NBPP would be the only ones packing?
CurtZHP on February 13, 2013 at 3:23 PM
Why doesn’t anyone want to get behind my proposal?
Galt2009 on February 13, 2013 at 3:31 PM
That right there is what will sink this. Gun owners are not sex offenders, and this riles people more than anything else.
I am expecting some sort of “expanded” background check, whatever that would mean, and some other window dressing bill to pass, given the black lash that people have been putting up about this I think most of the political class wants it to go away now…
Amnesty, that’s what they really want to be talking about. More votes there, “easier” sells too…
Gatsu on February 13, 2013 at 3:44 PM
“Gun control” is just another wedge issue being driven by Obama to permanently separate younger voters from conservatism. It’s also an extremely useful stalking horse for Obama to demonstrate to younger voters how the Constitution is “holding us back” from being a “better society.”
It is very dangerous, and has almost nothing to do with the next election. It has everything to do with the long-range project of convincing the next generation to abandon the Constitution.
Someone on a blog recently said that the Constitution really is only a piece of paper. It lives and has value ONLY because “we the people” decide to keep living by it and hold politicians accountable for violating it. But once a majority of voters decides that it is a mere inconvenience, or worse, an actual impediment to a “better society,” it ceases to exist. The people will demand “unconstitutional” legislation and Executive action, and there is nothing to stop them.
rockmom on February 13, 2013 at 3:44 PM
Agreed.
Gatsu on February 13, 2013 at 3:56 PM
Make no mistake – the Proppressives real target are the Limitations placed on the government by the Constitution.
BTW, does anyone really think we will be “Entitled” to the right of Free-speech by the Dear Liar with more and more of their national communist agenda based on LIES?
Galt2009 on February 13, 2013 at 3:56 PM
Maybe it’s time to legislate recourse for willful breach of oath of office:
How can we tolerate politicians taking the oath to support and defend the Constitution, proceeding then to willfully undermine/subvert it.
petefrt on February 13, 2013 at 4:22 PM