Why Rand Paul is Marco Rubio’s biggest political threat
But even as Paul seeks to persuade the GOP establishment that his views on fiscal policy are increasingly within the mainstream of the GOP, he remains at odds with defense hawks, and pro-Israel advocates. American Enterprise scholar Frederick Kagan called Paul’s foreign policy speech at Heritage a “more artful” defense of Obama’s foreign policy than the president has ever made himself.
Paul’s hoping that his close relationship with Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell will pay dividends as he tries to broaden his appeal within the party. He’s given McConnell cover from a tea-party challenge to his right, while McConnell has praised his record and advised him on legislative strategy. It’s a win-win arrangement that gives Paul significant credibility with the establishment as he raises his profile.
“We’ve had, harkening back to the very early days of Rand Paul’s campaign, … a lot of people pushing back very hard until they figured it wasn’t beneficial for them to do that any more,” Adams said.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Well, sure beats choosing between Romney and Santorum.
crrr6 on February 12, 2013 at 7:50 PM
A fiscal conservative and a political realist when it comes to foreign affairs? Aquabuddha aside, Rand Paul is a return to Goldwater conservatism, and there’s nothing bad about that.
Hostile Gospel on February 12, 2013 at 7:54 PM
Bingo
Notorious GOP on February 12, 2013 at 8:03 PM
Marco Rubio’s destructive “progressive” positions are his biggest political threat.
Pork-Chop on February 12, 2013 at 8:15 PM
Cruz might be able to give Rubio a run for his money as well.
annoyinglittletwerp on February 12, 2013 at 8:30 PM
Rand Paul is not qualified to be CinC any more than Obama is, and shouldn’t be
http://cfif.org/v/freedom_line_blog/17142/rand-pauls-really-ignorant-paragraph/
Might as well be Michael Moore
jp on February 12, 2013 at 8:48 PM
Rand Paul is getting quite convincing.
Rubio has fizzled for me.
vityas on February 12, 2013 at 8:49 PM
We can’t tolerate an idiot that refers to Ronald Reagan and the GOP who defeated the Soviets as the “War Caucus” and goes on to repeat the Far-Left Lies about arming the Taliban and training bin laden. Doing so in front of a Heritage audience indicates he may be foolish enough to actually believe it and show himself to be a total fool.
jp on February 12, 2013 at 8:56 PM
jp on February 12, 2013 at 8:48 PM
LOL. Your drive-by pop-ins to destruct Ron Paul met with some nodding heads, but they also met with some resistance here. You honestly think your smears are going to sway folks against his son? Your sole purpose in posting here is to post negative comments about the Pauls. Who pays you?
Firefly_76 on February 12, 2013 at 8:58 PM
Try reading Rand’s speech, which Quinn Hillyer of Freedom Line blog took the task for the smears and lies of the Left Rand repeated showing just how ignorant and not ready for prime time he is.
jp on February 12, 2013 at 9:07 PM
jp on February 12, 2013 at 9:07 PM
Unfortunately for you, you’ve destroyed your credibility over the last few years, so you’ll need a new handle. No one is buying…
Firefly_76 on February 12, 2013 at 9:16 PM