<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lady SEALs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elfman</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2271022</link>
		<dc:creator>elfman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2271022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s a little late to be discussing military standards now.
 
Standards went out the window last year.

Hog Wild on February 11, 2013 at 10:46 PM &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m in the dark. Are you talking about gays in the military stuff or other changes to physical standards?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s a little late to be discussing military standards now.</p>
<p>Standards went out the window last year.</p>
<p>Hog Wild on February 11, 2013 at 10:46 PM </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m in the dark. Are you talking about gays in the military stuff or other changes to physical standards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Notorious G.O.P</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2271008</link>
		<dc:creator>The Notorious G.O.P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2271008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why not just get rid of our military all together? I mean our leaders are actively making us weaker with all this crap why beat around the bush and just end the military.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just get rid of our military all together? I mean our leaders are actively making us weaker with all this crap why beat around the bush and just end the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Browncoatone</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2271007</link>
		<dc:creator>Browncoatone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2271007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know boys. There are over 300,000,000 Americans. Even if there are 100 successful male applicants to every successful female applicant I have to think the sheer numbers will come in to play. Of course I also see lawsuits and degrading standards in the name of Political Correctness on the horizon so....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know boys. There are over 300,000,000 Americans. Even if there are 100 successful male applicants to every successful female applicant I have to think the sheer numbers will come in to play. Of course I also see lawsuits and degrading standards in the name of Political Correctness on the horizon so&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebar</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2271004</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2271004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No woman alive today can pass Ranger or SEAL training to the same standard as men.

The standard will be lowered, and our people will die.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No woman alive today can pass Ranger or SEAL training to the same standard as men.</p>
<p>The standard will be lowered, and our people will die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blink</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2270991</link>
		<dc:creator>blink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 04:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2270991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Gender-neutral occupational standards will need to be developed...

This does not mean that standards will necessarily be changed; it only means that occupational standards will be developed and/or tested in billets for which the only previous criterion was being male. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

What the heck does this mean?

Why do standards need to be developed or tested just because women are becoming candidates. It should be assumed that the existing standards existed for a reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gender-neutral occupational standards will need to be developed&#8230;</p>
<p>This does not mean that standards will necessarily be changed; it only means that occupational standards will be developed and/or tested in billets for which the only previous criterion was being male. </p></blockquote>
<p>What the heck does this mean?</p>
<p>Why do standards need to be developed or tested just because women are becoming candidates. It should be assumed that the existing standards existed for a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HitNRun</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2270955</link>
		<dc:creator>HitNRun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2270955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the men at the tip of the spear, already forced by requirement into missions against steep odds, will now fight with one hand behind their backs in the name of social progress.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
 and thats where the problems would start.

AndStatistics on February 11, 2013 at 10:26 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yep.

If the standards remained as they are, there would be no problem - or at least no more of a problem than there is with having women in combat at all, of which there are several. Perhaps one woman in the history of the SEAL corp would have ever passed BUDS, and even that is merely statistical conjecture. I&#039;ve certainly never met her.

But the media will start ginning up hype for the first woman SEAL, and the pressure will come, and they&#039;ll start passing.

And soldiers (well, technically sailors) will die. Because women cannot be as effective fighters as men. I&#039;m sorry, let me say that again: women cannot be as effective as fighters as men. One more time, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;for the Harvard faculty &lt;/a&gt;who are &quot;nauseated&quot; to hear these things: women cannot be as effective as fighters as men. At the level of performance where the best are put in situations where often even the best is not good enough, that&#039;s going to get people killed. And worse, imperil missions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the men at the tip of the spear, already forced by requirement into missions against steep odds, will now fight with one hand behind their backs in the name of social progress.</p>
<blockquote><p>
 and thats where the problems would start.</p>
<p>AndStatistics on February 11, 2013 at 10:26 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep.</p>
<p>If the standards remained as they are, there would be no problem &#8211; or at least no more of a problem than there is with having women in combat at all, of which there are several. Perhaps one woman in the history of the SEAL corp would have ever passed BUDS, and even that is merely statistical conjecture. I&#8217;ve certainly never met her.</p>
<p>But the media will start ginning up hype for the first woman SEAL, and the pressure will come, and they&#8217;ll start passing.</p>
<p>And soldiers (well, technically sailors) will die. Because women cannot be as effective fighters as men. I&#8217;m sorry, let me say that again: women cannot be as effective as fighters as men. One more time, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers" rel="nofollow">for the Harvard faculty </a>who are &#8220;nauseated&#8221; to hear these things: women cannot be as effective as fighters as men. At the level of performance where the best are put in situations where often even the best is not good enough, that&#8217;s going to get people killed. And worse, imperil missions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arnold ziffel</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2270951</link>
		<dc:creator>arnold ziffel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2270951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;When you get that high, you aren’t military anymore– you are a politician. And you usually reflect the administration you are under, and this one is especially parasitic..

melle1228 on February 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And the sad thing is at one time &lt;strike&gt;many&lt;/strike&gt;, some of these guys were of the &quot;kick ass and take names&quot; persuasion. Now they are too stupid to realize they are Obama&#039;s---or any administration&#039;s coffee boys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>When you get that high, you aren’t military anymore– you are a politician. And you usually reflect the administration you are under, and this one is especially parasitic..</p>
<p>melle1228 on February 11, 2013 at 9:59 PM</p></blockquote>
<p>And the sad thing is at one time <strike>many</strike>, some of these guys were of the &#8220;kick ass and take names&#8221; persuasion. Now they are too stupid to realize they are Obama&#8217;s&#8212;or any administration&#8217;s coffee boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hog Wild</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2270950</link>
		<dc:creator>Hog Wild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2270950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a little late to be discussing military standards now.

Standards went out the window last year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little late to be discussing military standards now.</p>
<p>Standards went out the window last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndStatistics</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2270936</link>
		<dc:creator>AndStatistics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2270936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*shrug* In theory, as long as they don&#039;t lower the standards, there shouldn&#039;t be any problems. However, due to the incontrovertible laws of human biology (we&#039;re, on average, smaller than men - it&#039;s just the way things are, and as fogw said only 2% of &lt;em&gt;male&lt;/em&gt; applicants pass) very, very few if any of the female applicants would pass. In this day and age, that low rate of passage probably means that the PCers will start demanding the standards be made &quot;fair&quot;, and &lt;em&gt;thats&lt;/em&gt; where the problems would start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*shrug* In theory, as long as they don&#8217;t lower the standards, there shouldn&#8217;t be any problems. However, due to the incontrovertible laws of human biology (we&#8217;re, on average, smaller than men &#8211; it&#8217;s just the way things are, and as fogw said only 2% of <em>male</em> applicants pass) very, very few if any of the female applicants would pass. In this day and age, that low rate of passage probably means that the PCers will start demanding the standards be made &#8220;fair&#8221;, and <em>thats</em> where the problems would start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oil Can</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/lady-seals/comment-page-1/#comment-2270934</link>
		<dc:creator>Oil Can</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242492#comment-2270934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the barbarians are charging over the hills of Rome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the barbarians are charging over the hills of Rome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>