How will he pay for it? Fiscal realities put Obama agenda in question
This year there’s an air of unreality about the budget compared to, for instance, 2009 when the president’s Democratic allies controlled both the House and the Senate. Exactly four years ago, when Obama proposed to collect $646 billion in new revenues from auctioning off greenhouse gas emission allowances, there was a reasonable expectation that the proposal would become law and that the $646 billion would flow into the Treasury.
When Obama does deliver his budget proposal next month, the fiscal path forward will remain in an extraordinarily makeshift and unpredictable state.
Veteran budget analyst Stan Collender wrote this week that even former congressional Budget Committee staffers who have spent their careers assessing budgets find that “the current situation is as complex, hard to read, and even harder to predict than any they’ve ever seen.”…
Illustrating just how unreal the current fiscal situation is, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said in his farewell address last week at Georgetown University that if Congress passes another continuing resolution and it allows the spending cuts required by the Budget Control Act to take effect, then his department “will have to abruptly absorb in a period of about six months” $43 billion in spending cuts (known as the sequester). This will be on top of what Panetta thinks are inadequate spending levels in the continuing resolution — what he described as “a $35 billion shortfall in operating funds for our active forces.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Lots and lots of trillion dollar coins should do it?
L
letget on February 11, 2013 at 4:22 PM
Just print more money.
Schadenfreude on February 11, 2013 at 4:24 PM
The genuinely stupid and evil imbecile that eats dogs, blows cocaine, frequents bath houses, and is often covered inflies like he is beezlebub DOESNT DESIRE A PROSPEROUS OR SOLVENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Is there not one fking reporter or editor or news director that can pull their head out of his rectum and engage in a modicum of critical thinking and figure this blatantly obvious crap out?
tom daschle concerned on February 11, 2013 at 4:26 PM
Same way Obama’s been paying for it. Borrowing, printing, and gutting defense.
Doughboy on February 11, 2013 at 4:33 PM
Unicorn farts!
CurtZHP on February 11, 2013 at 4:33 PM
Now address the condition when interest rates go up. Apparently somebody thinks the 0.0% introductory rate on a credit card is a good deal ….ultra-low interest rates which mean an ultra-low cost of financing….
Fact: We’ve already dived off the fiscal cliff. All we’re seeing now is the two parties fighting in mid air, trying to use the other as a cushion for the sudden stop at the bottom.
BobMbx on February 11, 2013 at 4:36 PM
From his stash!
gregbert on February 11, 2013 at 4:39 PM
nobar on February 11, 2013 at 4:39 PM
Best news all day
Schadenfreude on February 11, 2013 at 4:40 PM
The progressive ideology, whether practiced by Republicans or Democrats, does not work over time.
That’s because it’s based on economic illiteracy.
Obama’s Utopia will not work…. lower and middle-income families to be hardest hit.
visions on February 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM
We’ll just ship the lower and middle classes off to the glue factory, then the 2%ers will have their utopia.
No food, clothes, or new cars, but utopia nonetheless.
BobMbx on February 11, 2013 at 4:50 PM
What difference does it make?
Good Lt on February 11, 2013 at 5:03 PM
So in other words, any given Tuesday in the Obama era.
Good Lt on February 11, 2013 at 5:05 PM
The same way we are going to pay for amnesty. Borrow and print!
Wigglesworth on February 11, 2013 at 5:14 PM
By bankrupting the country?
Ward Cleaver on February 11, 2013 at 5:17 PM
FTFY
Ward Cleaver on February 11, 2013 at 5:18 PM
Probably wouldn’t stand a chance once Karl Rove is done with him.
CurtZHP on February 11, 2013 at 5:27 PM
Taxing the rich.
Reducing military spending.
Reducing the nuclear stockpile.
Green energy.
Investing in infrastructure.
Have I left anything out?
RoadRunner on February 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM
Fools, there has never been any intention to pay for any of it. Slow to the trough alphabet fluffers.
Bmore on February 11, 2013 at 6:09 PM