<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balancing the federal budget in 10 years: More gimmick than good policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/balancing-the-federal-budget-in-10-years-more-gimmick-than-good-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/balancing-the-federal-budget-in-10-years-more-gimmick-than-good-policy/</link>
	<description>Headlines from the Hot Air authors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:09:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwelf</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/balancing-the-federal-budget-in-10-years-more-gimmick-than-good-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2270733</link>
		<dc:creator>gwelf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 22:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242485#comment-2270733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[20 years or more to balance the budget?

He didn&#039;t even mention what happens when interest rates return to historic norms and that 16+X Trillion in debt starts to cost more per year than most everything else in the budget.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20 years or more to balance the budget?</p>
<p>He didn&#8217;t even mention what happens when interest rates return to historic norms and that 16+X Trillion in debt starts to cost more per year than most everything else in the budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atlas</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/balancing-the-federal-budget-in-10-years-more-gimmick-than-good-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2270646</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242485#comment-2270646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it really worth arguing about doing one of the only jobs Congress is actually supposed to do? 

Apparently not...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it really worth arguing about doing one of the only jobs Congress is actually supposed to do? </p>
<p>Apparently not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HondaV65</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/balancing-the-federal-budget-in-10-years-more-gimmick-than-good-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2270637</link>
		<dc:creator>HondaV65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242485#comment-2270637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It should be balanced tomorrow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be balanced tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trs</title>
		<link>http://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2013/02/11/balancing-the-federal-budget-in-10-years-more-gimmick-than-good-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-2270638</link>
		<dc:creator>trs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hotair.com/headlines/?p=242485#comment-2270638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we can just increase revenue now we will be able to implement spending cuts further down the road...promise! /liberal

That sounds like a workable plan! /republican]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we can just increase revenue now we will be able to implement spending cuts further down the road&#8230;promise! /liberal</p>
<p>That sounds like a workable plan! /republican</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>