Why Obama rejected Petraeus’s plan to aid the Syrian rebels
What happened here seems clear. Obama killed the idea of aiding Syrian rebels through a bureaucratic two-step. First, he refused to approve the level of aid his top advisers wanted. Second, he obtained a finding that the lower level of assistance he was willing to provide wouldn’t be sufficient.
This doesn’t mean Obama’s decision was incorrect. Among other drawbacks, supplying Syrian rebels with the kinds of weapons Petraeus asked for is risky because we cannot be confident they won’t fall into the hands of Islamist extremists. I’m not even sure we can be confident that the “moderate” factions to whom we would be supplying the weapons don’t include Islamist extremists.
Obama’s clear mistake, in my view, was his failure to identify reliably non-extremist forces to support early in the rebellion, before the radicals, aided by outside extremists in al Qaeda, became ascendant.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
“Moderate” Muslims; “extremist” Muslims; “religion of peace” Muslims all want the same thing.
davidk on February 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM
Leading from his behind.
The Obama Plan~ take all the credit, pass all the blame.
profitsbeard on February 10, 2013 at 6:59 PM
http://www.ldjackson.net/obama-approves-direct-funding-for-hamas/
davidk on February 10, 2013 at 7:29 PM
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/02/08/presidential-memorandum-presidential-determination-regarding-waiver-rest
davidk on February 10, 2013 at 7:32 PM