Obama’s turn in Bush’s counterterror bind
By the time Mr. Bush left office, he had shaved off some of the more controversial edges of his counterterrorism program, both because of pressure from Congress and the courts and because he wanted to leave behind policies that would endure. He had closed the secret C.I.A. prisons, obtained Congressional approval for warrantless surveillance and military commissions, and worked to close the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
So while Mr. Obama banned harsh interrogation techniques, he preserved much of what he inherited, with some additional safeguards; expanded Mr. Bush’s drone campaign; and kept on veterans of the antiterrorism wars like Mr. Brennan. Some efforts at change were thwarted, like his vow to close the Guantánamo prison and to try Sept. 11 plotters in civilian court.
“These are the same issues we’ve been grappling with for years that are uncomfortable given our legal structures and the nature of the threat, but the Obama team is addressing these issues the same way we did,” said Juan Carlos Zarate, who was Mr. Bush’s deputy national security adviser for combating terrorism.
Peter D. Feaver, a Duke University professor and former Bush national security aide, said Mr. Obama “believed the cartoon version of the Bush critique so that Bush wasn’t just trying to make tough calls how to protect America in conditions of uncertainty, Bush actually was trying to grab power for nefarious purposes.”










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I said this again and again in 2008. Obama would get the daily briefings on national security and FREAK OUT and not change anything.
John the Libertarian on February 10, 2013 at 9:53 PM
Find the segments on Benghazi. Brennan is ointed with much no good.
Schadenfreude on February 10, 2013 at 9:56 PM
This… I can believe.
More to the point.
CPT. Charles on February 10, 2013 at 10:04 PM
Harder than it looks, eh Hoss?
thebrokenrattle on February 10, 2013 at 10:05 PM
Surely the NYT will hold his feet to the fire like they did to Bush, right? I’m sure they’ll start any day now.
supernova on February 10, 2013 at 10:50 PM
(sound of crickets)…you beat me to it:)
Clink on February 10, 2013 at 11:18 PM
Holding feet to the fire is an enhanced interrogation tactic. We don’t do that anymore.
Odysseus on February 11, 2013 at 7:09 AM