A temporary majority: The problems Democrats can’t solve
If the Democratic party cannot bring about improvement in the economic numbers, it will not retain control of political power. It is as simple as that. No enduring majority coalition has been able to hang on to power for very long amid such widespread disappointment over the economy. And the warning signs are already there for the Democrats, if they care to look: The historically small numbers of Democrats in the House of Representatives, governorships, and state legislatures, plus the fact President Obama won fewer votes in 2012 than he did in 2008, are all signals that public patience with the party has its limits.
What’s more, the Democratic coalition is bound to have trouble doing what is necessary to grow the economy. The party of the 1930s, ’40s, and ’50s was a party of farmers and industrial laborers who depended on private-sector economic growth, so the Democrats of that era focused their efforts accordingly. But today’s Democratic party has many powerful constituents within it who are isolated from the ebbs and flows of the private economy. Upscale social liberals in the Northeast and Pacific Coast are so well off that they are basically recession-proof. And, what’s more, the position of the farmer-industrial working class has been usurped by unionized government workers and far-left gray-collar labor unions like the SEIU, which are more interested in expanding government than the economy.
All of this raises the key question: Can the Democrats keep these groups happy and grow the economy? The evidence to date suggests the answer is no. Witness the Democratic opposition to opening up domestic energy production, which would have been a no-brainer 50 years ago. Witness the party’s stimulus bill of 2009, which focused more on political patronage than economic growth. Witness the party’s continued efforts to push for a cap and trade system, which would kneecap economic growth. And above all, witness Obamacare, a vast regulatory system that saddles businesses with even more burdens. The Democrats have proposed all of these things since 2009, when they were voted into office to jump-start the economy.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Please enough Biology=Destiny/Demography=Destiny…you keep a majority by working it every day, on a variety of issues that come and go thru time…IF you can work it well, you keep your majority, if you don’t; you can’t….
JFKY on February 10, 2013 at 9:38 PM
I would agree but look at California. Crap employment numbers, high taxes and a ridiculous cost of living yet the drones continue to hand those freedom killing Marxist power year after year.
jawkneemusic on February 10, 2013 at 9:47 PM
Suggests?
ROFL
Bishop on February 10, 2013 at 9:47 PM
Do you seriously think any union member or liberal academic is going to vote Republican? They support Obama despite the fact that he’s pretty much continuing the policies they hated Bush for. They are not thoughtful or reasonable, they vote blue because it’s their tribe and they’ll stand with it until the water surges over the gunwales and it’s too late.
Also, anyone who has any boating knowledge, if you could tell me if that metaphor was in any way accurate or appropriate, I’d really appreciate it.
Living4Him5534 on February 10, 2013 at 9:50 PM
52% harlots on the dole
Schadenfreude on February 10, 2013 at 9:57 PM
I think this used to be true, but no longer is. According the media this is all the Repubs fault, and the low info voters absorb that as truth. Then are the others who accept this as the new normal and just want to keep in power the guys who promise them more .gov relief, like in the FDR days.
The one bright spot’s the governors and statehouses, except for CA, which has doubled down on the stupid.
juliesa on February 10, 2013 at 10:03 PM
His time is running out. As Thatcher said, it works only for while.
thebrokenrattle on February 10, 2013 at 10:06 PM
In 2014, those babies born in 2009, before the birth dropoff, will turn 5. If their families are illegal aliens, there will be nobody left in the family to re-qualify it for TANF, and the family will leave the US.
The more we push on energy and drilling, and the more we harp on Democrat hypocrisy on war issues, the less those who bit their tongues on these hypocrisies to keep the eevil Repugs from winning will defend the regime.
As the spit-and-baling-wire meant to carry through the 2012 election begins to fall apart, the failures of the economy will be unspinnable.
Sekhmet on February 10, 2013 at 10:25 PM
@ LivingforHim: Excellent analogy.
1921 C DRUM on February 10, 2013 at 10:46 PM
Uh, what are all of these acronyms? Not at all sure what you are referring to here.
karenhasfreedom on February 10, 2013 at 11:31 PM
TANF
As for the dropoff in Hispanic births, check out http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/11/29/u-s-birth-rate-falls-to-a-record-low-decline-is-greatest-among-immigrants/
The dropoff in immigration itself in http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/2012/04/PHC-04-23-Mexican-Migration.pdf
Sekhmet on February 10, 2013 at 11:44 PM