Why it’s unlikely Dems will beat the “six-year itch” and take back the House
There’s a phenomenon in American politics known as the “six-year” itch, which is the tendency of voters to reject a two-term president’s party in his sixth year in office. There are a number of explanations for this — scandal, disillusionment of the president’s base, hunger among the opposition. But for whatever the reasons, there has never been a case since the Civil War (i.e since the Democratic and Republican parties co-existed) in which a president regained control of the House for his party in the sixth term of his presidency. …
Liberal Kevin Drum at Mother Jones has argued that 2014 might break this trend. But I think it’s likely to hold, for several reasons. One, the redrawn Congressional maps are likely to protect Republicans at least until the second half of the decade. Two, the composition of the electorate in midterm elections is likely to be much more favorable to Republicans than the electorate Obama was able to galvanize during a presidential election year. Three, Obamacare’s major provisions will be implemented in 2014 and I’m betting against it going smoothly. This isn’t saying it can’t be done — seven such elections is a pretty small sample size and Republicans aren’t exactly popular right now. But it’s still unlikely.











Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
America wakes the **** up?
/
CW on February 9, 2013 at 4:22 PM
Because the GOP are their string puppets?
MelonCollie on February 9, 2013 at 4:23 PM
This is some proof that the overblown warnings and fears about the death knell of the GOP and the right are just that: OVERBLOWN.
Republicans dominate at the state level with 30 governorships and control of many more state legislatures than the dems.
CW on February 9, 2013 at 4:28 PM
If a GOP controlled House passes amnesty, I wouldn’t be so sure.
TxAnn56 on February 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM
It could happen if the GOP gives into amnesty… even if they’re hellbent on amnesty, they would be smart to wait till after the midterms.
ninjapirate on February 9, 2013 at 4:34 PM
They also need to wait until SCOTUS’s affirmative action ruling.
ninjapirate on February 9, 2013 at 4:34 PM
50% pay no income taxes. The GOP is already ineffective.
One. More. Amnesty. will render what little fight they put up moot.
MelonCollie on February 9, 2013 at 4:35 PM
Amazingly, this is true for every two-term (or more) president in the past century
2006 (Bush, D+31, R-30)
1998 (Clinton, D-5, R+5)
1986 (Reagan, D+5, R-5)
1974 (Nixon/Ford, D+49, R-48)
1958 (Eisenhower, D+49, R-48)
1946 (Roosevelt/Truman, D-54, R+55)
1938 (Roosevelt, D-72, R+81)
1918 (Wilson, D-22, R+25)
1906 (Roosevelt, D+32, R-28)
That’s the real wildcard. Although officially falling “back” into recession is another.
steebo77 on February 9, 2013 at 4:36 PM
I just read bho plans to put a pay raise for fed workers in his(if he ever does one) budget. I thought we didn’t have money for fuel for our aircraft carriers, but we can find money for pay raises?
L
letget on February 9, 2013 at 4:54 PM
This is why the social issues are so important. Social conservatives who are part of the 47% will still vote for conservative Republicans as long as they hold firm on the social issues. If the Republican candidates decide to adopt liberal social views, these conservatives who are part of the 47% will have no reason to vote for them.
Rose on February 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM
Overblown.
Don’t get me wrong ..there are issues but it is not as bad as some want to believe.
Say why didn’t you copy off all my post???
say want a pick me up???
http://subconch.com/2012/11/09/maps-post-2012-elections-president-by-county-and-state-us-house-senate-governors-state-legislatures/
Yeh a good amount of Red all over the place.
Also, note that in the liberal state of Washington ——
CW on February 9, 2013 at 5:06 PM
Why? Because the risk/benefits for cheating in House elections leans more toward risk than in presidential elections.
Republicans are legally prohibited from suing Democrats for cheating in presidential elections due to an insane agreement made years ago.
The Rogue Tomato on February 9, 2013 at 5:18 PM
They might take back the House but they’ll lose the senate.
Schadenfreude on February 9, 2013 at 5:39 PM
@Rose Bingo. And if the dems keep trying their gun control shtick, the pubs will eat them alive in ’14.
tommy71 on February 9, 2013 at 5:58 PM
Ok, what does he know, and when did he know it!
OldEnglish on February 9, 2013 at 6:06 PM
Before the election starts I am expecting half the Republicans up for re-election to declare they are now Democrats.
albill on February 9, 2013 at 6:06 PM
Obysmal predicts that Pelosi will have the gavel again after the 2014 elections.
Meanwhile, the brain-trus Maxine Waters weighs in on the very powerful data collection that the “very smart” Obysmal has put into place.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/02/06/Maxine-Waters-Reveals-Obamas-Secret-Data-Base-Filled-Voters-Private-Info-Dems-Secret-To-Crush-GOP
onlineanalyst on February 9, 2013 at 6:11 PM
It doesn’t really matter. The dems are getting everything they want. The Republican establishment lurched to the left after Obama’s reelection; more spending, egregious pork, tax increases, illegal alien amnesty. The Senate is even working on bipartisan gun control. I think the goal is to move so far to the left that conservatives will just throw up their hands and say “you win”. The dems took the opposite approach after GWB was reelected and it worked like a charm.
Wigglesworth on February 9, 2013 at 6:47 PM
If the 7 red state Dems up for re-election vote for amnesty, the Rs could take the Senate, which would be proof that the majority of the American people don’t want any form of amnesty (which is the legalization) or path to citizenship. I think those 7 prefer to keep their jobs, so it’s possible amnesty could die in the Senate. And if it dies in the Senate, I would hope it dies in the House. There’s a couple of ways this thing could go.
TxAnn56 on February 9, 2013 at 6:59 PM