Call Obama’s sequester bluff
Obama has zero interest in lowering tax rates. He just got through raising them at the fiscal cliff and has made perfectly clear ever since that he fully intends to keep raising taxes. His only interest in eliminating loopholes is to raise more cash for the Treasury — not to use them to lower rates.
That’s not tax reform. That’s a naked, old-fashioned tax increase.
Hence Republican message No. 3: The sequester is one thing, real tax reform quite another. The sequester is for cutting. The only question is whether it will be done automatically and indiscriminately — or whether the president will offer an alternative set of cuts.
Then we can take up real tax reform. Reprise the landmark Reagan-Tip O’Neill-Bill Bradley tax reform of 1986, a revenue-neutral spur to economic growth and efficiency, and a blow for fairness for those not powerful enough to manipulate the tax code.
The country needs tax reform. But first it needs to rein in out-of-control spending.










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
I actually agree with K here.
MoreLiberty on February 8, 2013 at 1:27 PM
Obama’s base
Schadenfreude on February 8, 2013 at 1:28 PM
Kraut is spot on.
filetandrelease on February 8, 2013 at 1:47 PM
what Chuck meant to say..
hillsoftx on February 8, 2013 at 1:52 PM
Reality: Republicans will cave in to the Obama, taxes will be raised.
Republicans will be blamed for all problems.
albill on February 8, 2013 at 2:21 PM
But specifically, they have offered alternatives, including a bill in the last House that detailed how to make the cuts without making the soldiers pay (Pannetta says they will take it out of military paychecks, idiot,) or hurting future defense cutting equipment for the future.
President Obama had a deadline of Sept. 14th to detail how he would make the cuts, he missed it.
President Obama told Mitt Romney there would be no need for lay off notices for defense contractors Before the Election, and gave them exemptions not to send them out…as required by law…he said there would not be any layoffs.
Fleuries on February 8, 2013 at 3:30 PM
1. The current crop of GOP leaders haven’t got the ability to drive a deal, or communicate with their public
2. This deal is already law
3. Whether or not the cuts happen, the GOP will get blasted by the MSM, so they might as well take advantage of the last deal they will ever get with Obama’s signature on it
4. If the current crop of GOP leaders brokers a different deal with Lobama, guaranteed it will anger the base. Not worth it.
The two parties are already working together to force amnesty
How fast does the GOP want to die?
If amnesty goes through, the GOP ain’t getting the base back. It won’t matter about sequester
If amnesty does not go through, the GOP has a chance in the next election cycle. Their biggest problem is the almost complete breakdown of trust with the base. Lib voters arent going to vote republicans into Congress. It still takes the base, Rove to the contrary. Listen to the Kraut
entagor on February 8, 2013 at 4:01 PM