How the Hagel nomination looks in Tehran
The Islamic Republic greeted Obama’s election in 2008 with mixed emotions. On the one hand, the Iranian regime worried that Obama’s barrier-breaking achievement and inspiring life story might appeal to the average Iranian in a way unmatched by any previous U.S. president.
On the other, the Iranian regime continued to believe that its lifelong rivalry with the United States is the result of flatly irreconcilable differences: what it sees as Washington’s unshakable opposition to the Iranian revolution, unqualified and limitless support for Israel, and insistence on competing with Iran for influence over the Middle East.
If Obama’s election didn’t change Tehran’s view of U.S. policy, it’s hard to see how Hagel’s nomination could. After all, America’s war-weariness is no secret, and it’s hardly limited to Vietnam veterans such as Hagel. Iranian decision-makers can read The New York Times and watch CNN like anyone else, and they understand the reluctance, both among America’s people and elites, to go to war against Iran over its nuclear program.
Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Secksy?
tommy71 on February 7, 2013 at 4:00 PM
“Our brother Obama is helping us in soooo many ways, yeahhhhh” — Tehran
Schadenfreude on February 7, 2013 at 4:00 PM
The first word that comes to my mind is “capitulation”.
cthulhu on February 7, 2013 at 4:28 PM
First, it is fallacious to presume that the NYT and CNN reflect the positions/values of the American people. Second, why the distinction between American people and elites? Are American “people” by definition, non-elite?
ted c on February 7, 2013 at 4:30 PM