WaPo
Poll: Majority of voters back gay Boy Scouts
In the Quinnipiac poll, 55 percent of respondents said the scouts should drop the ban, while 33 percent said it should remain.
There is a significant gender gap in the results. Women back gay scouts by a 61 to 27 percent margin; among men it’s a narrower 49 to 39 percent margin.
Catholics are also far more likely than Protestants to support the inclusion of gay scouts.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2
Well said.
BTW THE HOT AIR LOGO BITMAP IS ONCE AGAON COVERING THE SUBIT BUTTON AND LOGIN link ON HEADLINE THREADS PLEASE FIX THIS.
I have asked about this a dozen times or more.
dogsoldier on February 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM
Nope. Just Marxist oligarchies attempting the same experiments that failed so spectacularly in Germany, Russia, China, etc.
Kataklysmic on February 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM
About as much as you fear gun owners, anti-abortion protestors, and people who won’t bow to the gayfia.
MelonCollie on February 6, 2013 at 2:48 PM
dogsoldier on February 6, 2013 at 2:44 PM
Thank you.
And, I’m with you. It’s a pain.
kingsjester on February 6, 2013 at 2:55 PM
While I do have differences with gun nuts, anti woman warriors and homophobes, I don’t run around terrified that they’re going to Take Amarica Away From Us.
The tea party had me a little worried, but then the turned out to be just another crew of noisy cranks.
urban elitist on February 6, 2013 at 2:56 PM
So you are afraid, or you wouldn’t be using moonbat slander terms. You’re afraid that we won’t bow to your idiotic whims and nonsensical ideas of ‘fairness’.
MelonCollie on February 6, 2013 at 2:58 PM
Yet I’m sure you’re fine with OWS thugs and G8 anarchists throwing bricks through windows and raping coeds.
Why are liberal such hypocrites and so f@cking stupid?
hawkdriver on February 6, 2013 at 3:01 PM
Barbaric superstitions about gay people are impossible to defend. Luckily, support of the dignity of people is compatible with conservative values.
thuja on February 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM
Show me poll averages on this issue and models. Independent polls not media push polls. I don’t buy media commissioned polls whether I like the results or not.
tommyboy on February 6, 2013 at 3:03 PM
I have the same issue. I’m using Firefox on a Linux system. What are you using?
thuja on February 6, 2013 at 3:04 PM
They’re like the most wretched enfant terrible you ever saw on a TV show – badly overdue for the attitude to be taken out of them by their elders and betters.
MelonCollie on February 6, 2013 at 3:04 PM
urban elitist on February 6, 2013 at 2:56 PM
Come on down to Mississippi, son. And, we will explain to you just how “terrified” we are of Liberals.
kingsjester on February 6, 2013 at 3:04 PM
FTFY.
As for superstitions – ask that to the photographer who was sued for refusing to take pictures of your fellow perverts’ “wedding”. Or the Canadian pastors who can’t even preach about gays in church.
MelonCollie on February 6, 2013 at 3:06 PM
And….?
If someone isn’t in favor of the BSA policy making gays ineligible to be Scout Leaders, they they don’t have to join or donate money to the BSA.
I’m not sure what a poll is supposed to mean, other than as a ham-handed way to try and pressure a private organization into adopting a policy.
JohnTant on February 6, 2013 at 3:07 PM
Any tech jobs? I’ve been a techie since Windows 3.1 was hot stuff. Hell, any good jobs, period?
I can’t move unless I have employment waiting is the thing; college drained my funds, thankfully I have no student loans.
MelonCollie on February 6, 2013 at 3:08 PM
Before the 2012 election, I believed as did many people here that the polls were biased. Clearly, Romney would win. Now, within reason I believe polls. There may be 5% of the population which answered pro-gay, but would in secret be anti-gay. However, as time goes by such people become pro-gay.
thuja on February 6, 2013 at 3:09 PM
Here is my question for you low information (the old moron voter) voter, who is all good with the Boy Scouts caving in on their principles and beliefs to open up the Boy Scouts to openly gays: Are you perfectly fine with a male who is attracted to other males, taking your 8 to 14 year old son, camping in the woods, with follow up question of, would you then also be perfectly fine with a male who is attracted to females to take your 8 to 14 year old daughter camping in the woods? The sane answer to both question, should be a HELL NO.
Beastdogs on February 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM
MelonCollie on February 6, 2013 at 3:08 PM
Check the job boards. I live right across Stateline Road from Memphis. We have a lot of warehouses in the area. I’m a Marketing VP over 3 companies doing press releases and such and using the Social Media to increase busines. The jobs are out there.
kingsjester on February 6, 2013 at 3:10 PM
I was reading about gay rights in Indian and noticed that the Christian churches including the Catholic Church want people to be imprisoned for being gay. People who want to perpetuate barbaric superstitions against gays should be given the same legal punishments that they want to inflict on gays.
thuja on February 6, 2013 at 3:15 PM
Unless they’re Christians or the unborn, right?
hawkdriver on February 6, 2013 at 3:16 PM
Good sir, please read the thread. As enlightened libs have already explained, only closeted gays like Sandusky are cause for concern. Why an out and proud scoutmaster taking your 8 year old son on a campout is no more cause for concern than Mother Theresa babysitting him. /
Kataklysmic on February 6, 2013 at 3:16 PM
WAPO conveniently excluded the word, “Liberal” or perhaps, “Leftwing” in their report as to who was polled, what these (what, 100 votes or something) represent.
Leftwing women, Liberals who are cafeteria-catholics…of course they want to see a private organization with non-Leftwing values remolded into the Humanist Boys.
Lourdes on February 6, 2013 at 3:17 PM
I have the same issue on FF Windows and IE8.
dogsoldier on February 6, 2013 at 3:17 PM
The possibility of a gay man sexually harassing a boy is much higher than a straight man harassing a girl… Gay man are much more driven by sexual lust and they have harder time controlling it… That is the reason many gay men go away for orgies, or are you too stupid to understand this?…
mnjg on February 6, 2013 at 3:18 PM
It happens on everything i’ve tried it on, Firefox in win7&8, IE in Win 7&8 and Firefox in Linux mint.
clearbluesky on February 6, 2013 at 3:19 PM
These Leftwingers (polled, reported by WAPO) should start their own *private* organization for the advancement of being Leftwing. Something about segregated-by-gender groups just doesn’t fit with a Leftwinger’s perspective, especially since as I understand most of them one’s gender is flexible depending on what the want may be.
The Left continues to harass private property to a point of destruction.
Lourdes on February 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM
Well it’s because they are too stupid to understand how stupid they are. They are to stupid to know what a hypocrite is as well as irony.
Dr. Frank Enstine on February 6, 2013 at 3:21 PM
JetBoy is in perpetual denial. Or he maintains a perpetually false front in his comments, denying reality while promoting evasive perspectives.
Lourdes on February 6, 2013 at 3:21 PM
Right you are.
What was that from Obama and his appeasing fans? Oh, right, “leave my children alone.” “Private issue…”
Except if the children are someone else’s, then, apparently, it’s a green light for rearranging their exposure to just about everything at any time by anyone for *whatever*.
Lourdes on February 6, 2013 at 3:24 PM
I think that’s the likely next phase of the “remaking of America” by the Left.
Because that is where this is headed and the Left knows it, including homosexual-activists. DOn’t fall for the “who, meeee?!?” feigned incredulity of those involved, it’s a charade.
Lourdes on February 6, 2013 at 3:27 PM
Folks it is up the Boy Scouts. They will decide in May. Stop through a collective hissy fit over it.
SC.Charlie on February 6, 2013 at 3:28 PM
As the mother of a Cub Scout and a Cub Buddy (next year he’ll be a tiger) the issue is not possible molestation. Being in the Antique and Design business, I’m surrounded by gay people and have them as close friends and yes, family members.
I agree with you that an “out” man is far less likely to abuse than someone living with conflict in the closet. However, when you put a person in a leadership position you are holding up and condoning the lifestyle they choose to lead. Since many packs and troops are sponsored by churches (ours is Baptist) it is wrong to make them accept a leader that lives a life that is not condoned in the Bible.
Now, if that is right or wrong is a discussion for another day.
mrsmwp on February 6, 2013 at 3:34 PM
You’re referring to yourself, then?
Liberals are first and foremost Leftwingers. They seem to love latching onto the Catholic church not out of fidelity with the Church but because it’s a route to exploit virtues, and here they go again with their effort to exploit the Boy Scouts.
Homosexual activists made a determined, intentional hack of the CHurch by way of Seminaries years ago, going about selecting candidates for admission based upon…IF they were homosexual and discouraging heterosexuals from the Priesthood.
It’s resulted in massive heartache, hideous sin in violation of human beings and it’s all been done in the name of “fairness” by homosexuals. Sin always adopts one of those Progressive, appealing names for itself.
Pope Benedict is finally working on this horrible, wretched problem. I think a big part of a solution would be to stop tolerating the idea of “homosexuality is just like heterosexuality” because it isn’t — the corruption of the mind and heart by a corrupt culture is a large part of it.
Lourdes on February 6, 2013 at 3:38 PM
Once and for all, for all the supporters of gays in the scouts-
ANSWER THIS QUESTION:
ARE YOU FOR OR AGAINST ANYONE BEING A SCOUT LEADER?
reddevil on February 6, 2013 at 3:44 PM
You on the Left remain in denial about the use and abuse of culture, “peer pressure” to force Leftwing “remaking of America” while promoting instead some artificial innocence about what your objectives actually are as also the methods used.
“‘Gay’” is a process that is introduced and reinforced culturally – “we’re only playing games, everyone else does it” and along those lines to gullible youth. Eventually the physical acts but the cultural-modification and indoctrination process remains constant. And make no mistake, it’s opposed to Christianity for reasons most Christians will readily recognize.
Lourdes on February 6, 2013 at 3:54 PM
I am for gays being allowed in the Boy Scouts. And, I am against some people being scout leaders. I am, also, for women teaching young boys in our public schools. But I don’t think they should be allowed to prey upon the young male students. And, what usually happens in these situations is that they get light sentences or no sentences at all.
SC.Charlie on February 6, 2013 at 3:57 PM
Funny, that didn’t work out so well in California, even with the publishing of voters ans supporters names. The sodomites lost.
How is your colon health?
Bulletchaser on February 6, 2013 at 4:00 PM
Not only opposed, the Left openly HATES Christianity. This is not about the boy scouts, this is about forcing out Christianity. Make no mistake, the left’s CHRISTIAN HATE sees a target in abolishing the First Amendment. They don’t like that we have something to believe in and want it gone.
reddevil on February 6, 2013 at 4:00 PM
You should really stop your hate of those that you don’t want in the Scouts.
reddevil on February 6, 2013 at 4:02 PM
Your attempt at trying to be funny is pathetic. I wouldn’t want a gay or straight child molester be a scout leader and neither would you. My father was a physician. When he examined women he made sure that a nurse was present whenever he examined a woman.
SC.Charlie on February 6, 2013 at 4:10 PM
Actually its not, but keep trying. Insults are the first sign of someone who can’t win the argument. Please stop your hate by the way.
reddevil on February 6, 2013 at 4:27 PM
Then your side has lost. This entire issue is up to the Boy Scouts of America. It is not up to the government. And, I have just my one opinion.
SC.Charlie on February 6, 2013 at 5:43 PM
Stop being hateful, you hatey haters!
/reddevil
Be quiet, child.
MelonCollie on February 6, 2013 at 6:16 PM
Comment pages: « Previous 1 2