Note to Obama: Spending on infrastructure won’t drive economic growth
When I was in college, prominent experts and journalists — Lester Thurow, Robert Reich, James Fallows, Kevin Phillips, et al. — were insisting Japan would be the next world economic superpower. In the late 1980s, Jacques Attali, the first head of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, claimed that “America has become Japan’s granary, like Poland was for Flanders in the 17th century.” Attali did allow for the possibility that the U.S.’s West Coast might do okay, but only because it was “in the gravitational pull of Japanese financial power and geographic proximity.”
Japan is now well into its third “lost decade.” Over the years, it has poured money into “stimulative” infrastructure projects that have yet to stimulate and protected industries that have steadily lost their competitive edge. Economic growth has averaged less than 1 percent since 2000, while government debt is now more than twice its GDP. If a highly educated work force, support for allegedly cutting-edge industries, and lavish spending on infrastructure was the recipe for economic growth (and if debt didn’t matter), Japan would be doing great.
Obama surely wants to see some real economic growth. Perhaps the problem is that he thinks investing in a much bigger cart to put before the horse will get him where he wants to go.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
If it were true we could pay people to dig holes and then fill them back in. The only problem is that most public union members would screw up even that.
Bishop on February 6, 2013 at 9:22 PM
Watch “Welcome to North Korea” to see how much prosperity you get by building nothing but infrastructure.
Socratease on February 6, 2013 at 9:36 PM
The question is, who the hay cares if every street is full of potholes, if I can’t afford the gas to put in my car to drive on them? Infrasturcture be damned, that’s just code for “government taking my money and spending it because they don’t think I’m smart enough to provide for myself”.
waterytart on February 6, 2013 at 9:37 PM
But, but, but… FDR!!!! WPA!!! The end of the Great Depression!!!!
ButterflyDragon on February 6, 2013 at 10:13 PM
When you look inside Obama’s idiotic rhetoric, all you find is bullshit. Just like with illegal immigrants/amnesty, just like with “jobs” and the economy…it’s all bullshit.
In this case O’Bozo had a trillion dollars to flush down the infrastructure toilet, if he thought that was going to be a big jobs/economy/building win/win/win for the country, but instead he and Pelosi handed it out to nitwit leftwing special interest groups.
Jaibones on February 6, 2013 at 11:51 PM
Duh.
The Rogue Tomato on February 7, 2013 at 12:24 AM
I really wonder what we could have done with a trillion dollars if we could have gotten a good deal for the money and cut out a lot of the governmental red tape?
2 or 3 ultra-modern ports on each coast?
Convert the entire power grid to nuclear power?
Functioning permanent Lunar Colony?
High-speed rail between Hooterville and Pixley?
trigon on February 7, 2013 at 12:34 AM
It will be different with Obama in charge.
Everything he does is successful & everything he touches turns to gold.
He’s our wise daddy.
And daddy knows everything.
Badger40 on February 7, 2013 at 7:53 AM