The right way to cut Pentagon spending
So where should policy makers reduce spending?
• First, eliminate unnecessary overhead in the Pentagon, defense agencies and headquarters staffs. Since 2001, these have grown like weeds. Over the past decade, the number of DOD civilians increased by more than 100,000, to roughly 778,000 in 2010, while the number of contractors also ballooned. …
• Second, take steps to reduce the costs of military health care without sacrificing quality of care. The current trajectory of the Pentagon’s health-care spending is unsustainable. DOD’s medical costs have more than doubled since 2001, to more than 10% of the defense budget from roughly 6%, and they are growing faster than any other federal health-care program: 10.6% per year, compared with 9% for the Veterans Administration and 8.5% for Medicare. Overall, U.S. health-care costs are rising 6.3% per year. …
• Third, cut excess infrastructure. Since the last Base Realignment and Closure Commission in the late 1990s, Congress has prevented the Defense Department from closing bases it no longer needs or consolidating infrastructure to better support evolving missions. This inability to shed or realign facilities hangs like an albatross around the department’s neck, consuming billions of dollars that could otherwise go to readiness and modernization. Congress should grant DOD’s request for another Base Realignment and Closure Commission round this year.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Yeah cut tricare some more…
sounds great hey did you know our plan is the only one where 26 year old “children” can’t stay on it?
I have a better idea cut it 100% you’ll have balanced the budget!
Well no not really but I am DYING for you guys to finally get your way.
harlekwin15 on February 5, 2013 at 8:48 PM
btw this woman was passed over by Obama for Hagel, she knows infinitely more about defense issues
commodore on February 5, 2013 at 8:56 PM
Don’t forget to ask the troops – enlisted, and junior officers – where the waste is: they see a lot. And ask them directly, any survey the military conducts is going to get turned into the company song.
PersonFromPorlock on February 5, 2013 at 9:30 PM
and be sure to cut ONLY the military…there is no fraud waste or abuse on our glorious non defense discretionary spending side of the house….
harlekwin15 on February 5, 2013 at 9:39 PM
We need to cut spending by $1T just to balance one years budget, let alone paying off our debt. Eliminating “waste” is barely scratching the surface. The conservative approach to big defense cuts is to significantly cut our active Army and Marine ground forces. There is no risk of a military invasion by Canada, and like the Founders I fear a large standing army in the hands of these politicians. Also too much risk of more overseas adventures. We need to maintain a strong navy and air force to protect fortress America.
Of course we need to keep a some active armored and infantry regiments, Rangers and Airborne for rapid deployment, and multiple Marine expeditionary units on amphibious assult ships. And expand the reserves just in case. But big cuts in numbers and equipment.
fastphil101 on February 5, 2013 at 10:09 PM
I’m totally for her being Sec of Def. in the next R administration. It would be a good bipartisan pick.
Illinidiva on February 6, 2013 at 7:14 AM