Hey, who decided that U.S. megabanks are Too Big to Jail?
In an on-camera interview, which aired recently, Breuer stated plainly that some financial institutions are too large and too complex to be held accountable before the law. …
Attorney General Eric Holder expressed similar views in the context of discussing why more severe charges weren’t brought against Zurich-based UBS AG last year for manipulating the London interbank offered rate. And Neil Barofsky, a onetime senior prosecutor and former inspector general of the Troubled Asset Relief Program that administered the bank bailouts, provided a scathing assessment of Justice Department policy. …
Justice recently asked Treasury for its view on prosecuting a large financial institution. Yet David Cohen, Treasury’s undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, told the New York Times: “We did not believe we were in a position to offer any meaningful assessment. The decision of how the Justice Department exercises its prosecutorial discretion is solely theirs and Treasury had no role.” And it would seem that then Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner didn’t meet with Holder on this issue. …
The line of questioning from Brown and Grassley is compelling. Is there a written list of too-big-to-jail banks, or is that status conferred on the fly? Are there objective criteria that could be reviewed by the Government Accountability Office or another responsible government body? …
Judging from its record, the Justice Department will probably do everything in its power to avoid answering these questions directly.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
There’s a huge opening here for the GOP, so I expect them to do absolutely nothing.
Mark1971 on February 4, 2013 at 8:43 PM
The politicians that benefited from the megabank’s campaign donations, that’s who.
RoadRunner on February 4, 2013 at 9:02 PM
Uh…pretty much everyone in power regardless of party.
Banks pay well…
CorporatePiggy on February 4, 2013 at 9:52 PM
The banks and their cronies in Washington DC.
FloatingRock on February 4, 2013 at 10:01 PM
Well, lets take a review.
Take for example Bank of Oklahoma of Tulsa Oklahoma.
Guy who owns most of that stock, he big oil guy a 1%, one of the largest doners to the Democrat Party /B. Obama.
Same guy who made off with our tax money on the Solrenda solar pannel scam/fruad/kickback/illegal pay off operation.
Evil Money Cult Paying themselves off with our tax money.
APACHEWHOKNOWS on February 4, 2013 at 10:04 PM
TWO PARTY EVIL MONEY CULT
APACHEWHOKNOWS on February 4, 2013 at 10:06 PM
That tends to happen when you’re also on the take.
Dack Thrombosis on February 4, 2013 at 10:22 PM
A third party could run on this issue alone and sweep Congress and the Presidency.
Dack Thrombosis on February 4, 2013 at 10:23 PM
You might be right about this.
Mark1971 on February 4, 2013 at 10:35 PM