More immigration would be good for the economy
More broadly, of all the developed countries, the U.S. puts the lowest priority on potential economic benefits when reviewing prospective immigrants, according to Pia Orrenius, an economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. She estimates that of the 1.1 million green cards issued every year, 85% are to family members or for humanitarian purposes. Only 15% are for highly skilled immigrants based on employment, and half of those go to the workers’ spouses and children. Australia, Britain and Canada are outcompeting the U.S. for skilled people by using a point system based on immigrants’ education and ability to invest or start companies.
The parts of the U.S. system that are designed to boost the economy need updating. The H-1B visa program, established in 1990, creates 65,000 visas a year for highly skilled workers. But the demand for skilled technologists has grown so much since then that in some years this quota has been filled within hours. No wonder Steve Jobs was impatient.
Smarter immigration policy would give less-skilled immigrants a path to citizenship that could include language and civics requirements. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that legalizing the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. would boost revenues by $48 billion over 10 years while costing $23 billion in increased public services.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
every bit as good as more government spending…
tomg51 on February 4, 2013 at 11:29 AM
More immigration would be good for the
economyfood stamps. Which is our greatest growth industry now now.Oil Can on February 4, 2013 at 11:30 AM
An article arguing for the economic benefits of increased immigration and not even a single mention of the effect on wages and salary.
Why would the author avoid basic economic effects in an article lobbying for a change in US policy?
chimney sweep on February 4, 2013 at 11:31 AM
We allow more immigrants than the rest of the world combined, and have done so since 1965.
If immigration was the magic bullet for jobs, our unemployment rate would be 0.1%.
What we really need is an immigration moratorium, at least ten years. In addition, the H1B visa program needs to be eliminated, there are millions of under and unemployed American IT workers needing those jobs.
Amnesty would spell the end of the republic, and a defacto one party fascist state – and the economy would tank into 3rd world levels.
Rebar on February 4, 2013 at 11:32 AM
It would be great if Hispanics immigrated to Mexico. So let’s start encouraging that.
MelonCollie on February 4, 2013 at 11:32 AM
The IQ in the Hot Air comments section seems to have plunged considerably seeing how people can’t even be bothered to read the quoted excerpt before mouthing off.
Darth Executor on February 4, 2013 at 11:33 AM
How’s that working out for Europe? Pft…
jawkneemusic on February 4, 2013 at 11:34 AM
Ad hominem much, compadre?
chimney sweep on February 4, 2013 at 11:39 AM
Nothing is better for the economy than adding more uncertainty.
(And, yes, Spanky, I did read the article.)
apostic on February 4, 2013 at 11:39 AM
Uh, that points system really worked well in Britain. If you are a Mozlem you immediately get eleventy million points. If you are a Mozlem terrorist or sympathizer you get eleventy billion.
CorporatePiggy on February 4, 2013 at 11:39 AM
3rd world immigration means more welfare and according to democrats welfare spending stimulates the economy so maybe this guy is on to something. Pssst! Look at California.
Wigglesworth on February 4, 2013 at 11:39 AM
For the Mexican and Indian economies, fools.
Mexico should shape up and employ its own people.
Indians should go back home and take care of their leprocy ridden relatives, whom even the UN has forgotten. Instead they flourish in the US, take private flying lessons, and……..vote for Obama.
Fools, you pay for it all.
Schadenfreude on February 4, 2013 at 11:39 AM
Hmmm, I know that math is not my strong suit but importing people into a high unemployment situation seems counterproductive.
Cindy Munford on February 4, 2013 at 11:40 AM
No, your misuse of Latin in an attempt to sound smarter than you really are pretty much confirms it.
Darth Executor on February 4, 2013 at 11:41 AM
So 1.1 million is the number of immigrants granted legal status and welcomed by Americans to this country every year.
But according to the Tiny Minority of Open Borders Extremists, that’s just not enough. If you’re not comfortable with bringing in eleven to forty million more and right now!, you’re a reactionary exclusionist, shaming America before the world and keeping her from living up to her past greatness.
I’d like to know just how many immigrants John McCain has sponsored for citizenship to this country. How many is he willing to bring into his own home and provide for their needs till they can get oriented enough to find their way to the local Acorn office and register to vote Republican?
sartana on February 4, 2013 at 11:41 AM
While the entire RotW, who can fluke itself, preach to the US on how to be more “fair”. Go to Hades, all of you. Take care of your own.
The Amnesty and ‘global warming’ and all the idiotic projects are nothing other than a global redistribution of wealth, a reparation under different names.
Only fools don’t get it. Support it and be a part of the problem. If you do, may they deplete you of all you have produced.
Starve the Looters/moochers.
Schadenfreude on February 4, 2013 at 11:44 AM
Smarter immigration policy would give less-skilled immigrants a path to citizenship that could include language and civics requirements. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that legalizing the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. would boost revenues by $48 billion over 10 years while costing $23 billion in increased public services.
Obama spends the diff. in one day. This is not good math, either way.
Schadenfreude on February 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM
No, no misuse here. Your comment was a logical fallacy. Brief, yet still, no actual argument.
Please point out the evidence that we did not read the article.
My comment was that there was not a single mention of wages or salary. Is this incorrect? Does the author mention either?
chimney sweep on February 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM
The WSJ = Karl Rove = Establishment = Weekly Standard = Suck it up America = You are scroomed by the left/right.
Schadenfreude on February 4, 2013 at 11:52 AM
LOL. And we can take the CBO’s estimates to the bank, right? This is the same bunch of shills that told us Obamacare wouldn’t add to the deficit. The CBO’s estimates are always bull$h*t, because of the bogus assumptions they use (which always favor whatever conclusion the administration wants the CBO to draw), or “garbage in, garbage out” as the saying goes.
At least one. The McCains adopted a baby girl (now in her teens, IIRC) from an orphanage in Bangladesh.
AZCoyote on February 4, 2013 at 12:01 PM
Actually, I do agree that more immigration is good
…!
sartana on February 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM
If so then why can’t it be legal immigration?
gwelf on February 4, 2013 at 12:04 PM
AZCoyote, according to the new rules, it’s not enough. Unless he takes in at least two dozen more, to include no less than three eighty-year-old grandmothers than I’ll still have him down as hater.
sartana on February 4, 2013 at 12:07 PM
Okay.
AZCoyote on February 4, 2013 at 12:13 PM
Isn’t this the same CBO who said Obamacare would dramatically lower healthcare costs?
HotAirian on February 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM
Of no other country in the world is the same asked as of the US on immigration and etc.
To Hades with all the hyopcrites.
Schadenfreude on February 4, 2013 at 12:20 PM
This is true. Most, if not all, of new immigrants will start out on public subsidies, and we all know that welfare and unemployment compensation are the best economic stimulant known to mankind.
BobMbx on February 4, 2013 at 12:20 PM
Oh, was it the Indian immigrant vote that tipped it Obama’s way?
Or are you just a flaming xenophobe?
DarkCurrent on February 4, 2013 at 12:26 PM
Which fallacy is it that explains Ponzi Scheme, or do I get the right to put the name for his very old line of Bu!!sh!t from a society trapped by its own socialist collapse.
Dusty on February 4, 2013 at 12:27 PM
Here’s a strategy to consider:
Lets implement an Immigrant Draft, set up much like the MLB and NFL draft.
Each country on the planet will be forced to draft a specified number of immigrants each year, with the picking order determined by a standard set of factors (give me some time, and I’ll come with something).
At the end of the first year (after being drafted), the immigrant can be traded to any other country. Any applicant immigrant not chosen in the draft is eligible to re-apply up to 4 times. Any person not drafted after 5 attempts (lifetime), is considered non-eligible for immigration and becomes the responsibility of the home country.
This, of course, will spur competition by those seeking a free ride, and will have to make themselves competitive by education, acquiring skills, and many other attributes.
I think it would work.
BobMbx on February 4, 2013 at 12:32 PM