How a chaotic hostage rescue foreshadows Afghanistan’s post-American future
On the morning of Jan. 10, 2012, five Taliban insurgents wearing stolen army and police uniforms stormed a government complex in Sharana, the capital of restive Paktika province in eastern Afghanistan. Their goal: to strike a meeting of the province’s top civilian, police, military and intelligence officials – essentially decapitating the provincial government of one of Afghanistan’s most important regions.
They failed — barely. Defeating just five insurgents barricaded in a stairwell required a chaotic seven-hour gun battle up and down three stories of a telecommunications building. Two civilian hostages and three policemen died in the tumult of the assault’s first few hours, as impatient Afghan leaders — whom the U.S.-led coalition deliberately allowed to take the lead — sent lightly armed cops on an almost suicidal frontal attack aimed at retaking the captured facility. Even that required the firepower of supporting U.S. Army troops and the intervention of a Polish commando unit, along with their Afghan trainees.
The obscure Sharana battle, reconstructed by Danger Room over the past year, offers a preview of what Afghanistan will look like after 2014, when all but a handful of U.S. and NATO troops leave. To temper expectations of how Afghan forces will perform when they’re in charge of the war, U.S. officials often use the term “Afghan good enough.” Tom Donilon, President Obama’s national security adviser, told The New York Times that the goal of “Afghan good enough” is an Afghanistan that “has a degree of stability.”









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
They will crumble and the Taliban will return with their pals AQ. Because we don’t have the balls to fight them properly.
dogsoldier on February 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM
Don`t freak out on me, I`m not a lib troll. But how would it be done properly? I`m thinking we`d have to go to war with Pakistan to really cripple them all.
ThePrez on February 4, 2013 at 5:52 PM
I won’t freak out on you and it’s a good question. We need to fight this war the way we fought World War II. Change the ROE so that our soldiers don’t have to check with a squad of lawyers before killing the enemy. For starters.
Where we know there are dense concentrations of Taliban, we need to bomb that area to rubble. There are no civilians there, only enemy combatants and their support infrastructure. It’s ugly business, but it’s the only path to victory over these savages.
dogsoldier on February 4, 2013 at 5:59 PM
Hopefully war with Pakistan won’t be necessary, but bear in mind that the taliban and AQ are regularly used by Pakistan and they helped Usama Bin Laden. They already are at war with US.
dogsoldier on February 4, 2013 at 6:03 PM
The role this”handful” of US troops will play in Afghanistan after the rest are pulled out will be called “target”.
Many there now are involved in a dress rehearsal for that role, with the aid of the Taliban and armed Afghans ostensibly on our side — some even wearing uniforms and carrying weapons we gave them.
I wonder if playing that role will be voluntary or if Dear Leader will volunteer them.
farsighted on February 4, 2013 at 7:32 PM